Literature DB >> 30144729

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with or without midurethral sling insertion: Is a two- step approach justified? A prospective study.

Corina Christmann-Schmid1, Esther Bruehlmann2, Isabell Koerting2, Joerg Krebs3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Most data support the fact that women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with concomitant symptomatic or occult stress urinary incontinence (SUI) benefit from concurrent POP and anti-incontinence procedure. However some data support a delayed or 2-step approach. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (SCP) alone with a delayed approach for SUI to prove the justification of a 2-step approach. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study from 2014 to 2016 including women with symptomatic POP ≥ stage 2 prolapse and concomitant SUI or occult SUI. Laparoscopic SCP for apical or multi-compartment POP with or without concomitant MUS insertion was performed. Primary outcome measures were asymptomatic regarding SUI after prolapse surgery alone, persisting SUI with or without subsequent anti-incontinence surgery.
RESULTS: A SCP alone was performed on 62 women. Stress urinary incontinence was seen in 31% with SCP alone and a third of those women needed an additional midurethral sling for persisting SUI. Women who chose a combined surgery for POP and incontinence with SCP and a suburethral sling the postoperative success rate regarding SUI was 100% with two women needing a sling release.
CONCLUSION: We showed that women with POP with concomitant stress urinary incontinence undergoing sacrocolpopexy benefitted from a two-step approach as only 11% needed an additional incontinence procedure. This study highlights the importance of pre-operative counselling. It should be tailored to the individual woman.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Combined prolapse and anti-incontinence procedure; Laparoscopic; Pelvic organ prolapse; Sacrocolpopexy; Stress urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30144729     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  3 in total

1.  Long-term Urinary Outcomes After Transvaginal Uterovaginal Prolapse Repair With and Without Concomitant Midurethral Slings.

Authors:  Lauren Giugale; Amaanti Sridhar; Kimberly L Ferrante; Yuko M Komesu; Isuzu Meyer; Ariana L Smith; Deborah Myers; Anthony G Visco; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Donna Mazloomdoost; Marie Gantz; Halina M Zyczynski
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.091

2.  Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension (LLS) for the Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A New Gold Standard?

Authors:  Patrick Dällenbach
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  Outcomes of robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension (RALLS) with mesh for anterior and apical prolapse.

Authors:  Patrick Dällenbach; Milena Alec; Michel Boulvain; Stas Shabanov
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-04-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.