Literature DB >> 30144488

Socio-economic variations in anticipated adverse reactions to testing HPV positive: Implications for the introduction of primary HPV-based cervical screening.

Mairead O'Connor1, Eamonn O'Leary2, Jo Waller3, Pamela Gallagher4, Cara M Martin5, John J O'Leary5, Linda Sharp6.   

Abstract

Some cervical cancer screening programmes are replacing cytology with human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing as the primary screening test. Concerns have been previously raised around the potential psychosocial impact of testing positive for HPV. We analysed socio-economic variations in anticipated adverse reactions to testing positive for HPV in women of screening age in the general population. A questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 5553 women aged 20-64 in 2010, selected through primary care in Ireland. This included questions on: socio-economics; HPV knowledge; and women's anticipated adverse psychosocial responses to testing HPV positive (shame, anxiety, stigma and worry). Multivariable linear regression was used to identify socio-economic factors significantly associated with each anticipated adverse reaction. The response rate was 62% (n = 3470). In multivariate analyses, having only attained primary level education were significantly associated with higher mean scores for all four adverse outcomes. Religion was significantly associated with all four adverse outcomes. Age was associated with anxiety and worry; younger women (<30 years) had the highest mean scores. Being married/cohabiting was significantly associated with significantly lower shame and worry scores. Not working was significantly associated with higher mean anxiety and worry scores. Our large population-based survey found significant socio-economic variations in anticipated adverse reactions to testing HPV positive. In order to minimise possible negative impacts on screening uptake and alleviate potential adverse psychological effects of HPV-based screening on women, screening programmes may need to develop specific messages around HPV infection and HPV screening that target certain subgroups of women.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer screening; Human papillomavirus; Primary HPV screening; Psychosocial impact

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30144488     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  3 in total

1.  Colposcopy non-attendance following an abnormal cervical cancer screening result: a prospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Linda A Liang; Sylke R Zeissig; Gunther Schauberger; Sophie Merzweiler; Kathrin Radde; Sabine Fischbeck; Hans Ikenberg; Maria Blettner; Stefanie J Klug
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Cancer stigma and cancer screening attendance: a population based survey in England.

Authors:  Charlotte Vrinten; Ailish Gallagher; Jo Waller; Laura A V Marlow
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  The European response to the WHO call to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Murat Gultekin; Philippe Morice; Pekka Nieminen; Maggie Cruickshank; Philip Poortmans; Daniel Kelly; Mario Poljak; Christine Bergeron; David Ritchie; Dietmar Schmidt; Maria Kyrgiou; Ann Van den Bruel; Laia Bruni; Partha Basu; Freddie Bray; Elisabete Weiderpass
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 7.396

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.