Shunsuke Kawakami1,2, Niklaus P Lang3,4, Takahisa Iida1,2, Mauro Ferri5,6, Karol A Apaza Alccayhuaman2, Daniele Botticelli2. 1. Department of Oral Implantology, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Japan. 2. ARDEC Academy, Rimini, Italy. 3. University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 4. Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 5. ARDEC Foundation, Cartagena de Indias, Bolívar, Colombia. 6. Rafael Núñez University Corporation, Bolívar, Colombia.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate dimensional variations of augmented sinus volumes after sinus floor elevation using a lateral approach placing the antrostomy close to the sinus floor or more cranially to it. METHODS:Twenty-four healthy volunteers in need of sinus floor elevation were included in the study. The lateral approach was adopted placing the antrostomy randomly either close to the level of the sinus floor (group A) or approximately 3-4 mm cranially (group B). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was done before surgery (T0) and after 1 week (T1) and 9 months (T2), and analyses on dimensional variations were performed. RESULTS: CBCT of 10 patients per group were analyzed. At T1, the sinus floor was found to be elevated by 9.8 ± 2.1 mm in group A and 10.9 ± 1.9 mm in group B. At T2, shrinkage of 2.0 ± 1.7 mm in group A and 1.4 ± 2.5 mm in group B was observed. The area was reduced approximately 18-24% between T1 and T2. The sinus mucosa width increased by 4.3-5 mm between T0 and T1, and regained the original dimensions at T2. CONCLUSIONS: The more cranial the antrostomy, the greater the augmentation height after 9 months.
RCT Entities:
AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate dimensional variations of augmented sinus volumes after sinus floor elevation using a lateral approach placing the antrostomy close to the sinus floor or more cranially to it. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers in need of sinus floor elevation were included in the study. The lateral approach was adopted placing the antrostomy randomly either close to the level of the sinus floor (group A) or approximately 3-4 mm cranially (group B). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was done before surgery (T0) and after 1 week (T1) and 9 months (T2), and analyses on dimensional variations were performed. RESULTS: CBCT of 10 patients per group were analyzed. At T1, the sinus floor was found to be elevated by 9.8 ± 2.1 mm in group A and 10.9 ± 1.9 mm in group B. At T2, shrinkage of 2.0 ± 1.7 mm in group A and 1.4 ± 2.5 mm in group B was observed. The area was reduced approximately 18-24% between T1 and T2. The sinus mucosa width increased by 4.3-5 mm between T0 and T1, and regained the original dimensions at T2. CONCLUSIONS: The more cranial the antrostomy, the greater the augmentation height after 9 months.