Literature DB >> 30144118

Wild mice in and around the city of Utrecht, the Netherlands, are carriers of Clostridium difficile but not ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, Salmonella spp. or MRSA.

S A Burt1, K Meijer1, P Burggraaff1, W S Kamerich1, C Harmanus2.   

Abstract

Mice in buildings are a hygiene hazard because they harbour several zoonoses and animal diseases. The aim of this study was to gather information on specific bacteria in house mice caught in the urban environment. Mice caught in snap traps during pest control activities were collected in and around the city of Utrecht, the Netherlands, during May-June 2014, October-November 2015 and September-November 2016. The gut contents were analysed for ESBL/AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae, Salmonella spp., and Clostridium difficile and the buccal cavities were swabbed for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). In total, 109 house mice (Mus musculus) and 22 wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) were examined. One mouse was found positive for Enterobacter spp. Salmonella spp. and MRSA were not found. Of n = 80 mice, 35·0% carried C. difficile (ribotypes in descending order of frequency: 014/020, 258, 002, 005, 013, 056, 081 and two unknown ribotypes). In conclusion, mouse droppings are a hazard for transmission of C. difficile to humans and their environment. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study shows that mice in buildings can carry Clostridium difficile ribotypes that are associated with clinical disease in humans. Whether the mice are the source or whether they picked up these bacteria from the human environment has not been investigated. Either way, mouse droppings in the indoor environment are a hazard for transmission of C. difficile to humans.
© 2018 The Authors. Letters in Applied Microbiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Apodemus sylvaticuszzm321990; zzm321990Clostridioides difficilezzm321990; zzm321990Clostridium difficilezzm321990; zzm321990Mus musculuszzm321990; house mouse; wood mouse

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30144118     DOI: 10.1111/lam.13066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0266-8254            Impact factor:   2.858


  4 in total

1.  Clostridioides difficile and multi-drug-resistant staphylococci in free-living rodents and marsupials in parks of Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Authors:  Jordana Almeida Santana; Salene Angelini Colombo; Brendhal Almeida Silva; Amanda Nádia Diniz; Lara Ribeiro de Almeida; Carlos Augusto Oliveira Junior; Francisco Carlos Faria Lobato; Giliane de Souza Trindade; Adriano Pereira Paglia; Rodrigo Otávio Silveira Silva
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.476

Review 2.  Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals.

Authors:  J Scott Weese
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.279

3.  Clostridium difficile in wild rodents and insectivores in the Netherlands.

Authors:  I M Krijger; B G Meerburg; C Harmanus; S A Burt
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 2.858

4.  Airborne Rodent Allergen Levels in Dutch Households: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sara A Burt; Lidia I Parramon Dolcet; Inge M Wouters
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.