| Literature DB >> 30143659 |
Joaquín Figueroa1,2, José Rogan1,2, Juan Alejandro Valdivia1,2, Miguel Kiwi1,2, Guillermo Romero3, Felipe Torres4,5.
Abstract
Strong correlation effects emerge from light-matter interactions in coupled resonator arrays, such as the Mott-insulator to superfluid phase transition of atom-photon excitations. We demonstrate that the quenched dynamics of a finite-sized complex array of coupled resonators induces a first-order like phase transition. The latter is accompanied by domain nucleation that can be used to manipulate the photonic transport properties of the simulated superfluid phase; this in turn leads to an empirical scaling law. This universal behavior emerges from the light-matter interaction and the topology of the array. The validity of our results over a wide range of complex architectures might lead to a promising device for use in scaled quantum simulations.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30143659 PMCID: PMC6109166 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30789-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Schematic representation of the Jaynes-Cummings-Hubbard lattice in a complex array where each node consists of a single resonator strongly coupled to a two-level system. (b) Phase transition from Mott-insulator to superfluid in light-matter CRAs systems as a function of the detuning parameter.
Figure 2Quantum phase transition of a dimer array. Detuning dependence of the order parameter with two TLS coupled through photon hopping, adiabatic dynamics (blue circles) and quench dynamics (red squares). Continuous lines have been added as guide to the eye.
Figure 3(a) Standard deviation of the superfluid phase as a function of the connectivity. Adiabatic dynamics (blue circles) and quench dynamics (red squares). A set of CRAs with four and five interconnecting resonators, as shown in (b) are considered. Continuous lines have been added as a guide to the eye.
Figure 4Numerical simulation of the quench dynamics. The full set of four node arrays, with (a,b) three; (c,d) four; (e) five; and (f) six connections. Connectivity per site (a) (1, 2, 2, 1), (b) (1, 1, 1, 3), (c) (2, 2, 2, 2), (d) (1, 3, 2, 2), (e) (2, 3, 3, 2), and (f) (3, 3, 3, 3). As the connectivity is increased locally the superfluid phase is achieved with a lower detuning strength. For each array and from left to right we have considered parameters log(Δ/g) = (0.5, 0.7, 0.75, 0.8), and g = 10−2ω, J = 10−3ω, where ω is the resonator frequency.