Bruce D Trapp1, Megan Vignos2, Jessica Dudman3, Ansi Chang3, Elizabeth Fisher4, Susan M Staugaitis5, Harsha Battapady6, Sverre Mork7, Daniel Ontaneda8, Stephen E Jones9, Robert J Fox8, Jacqueline Chen3, Kunio Nakamura4, Richard A Rudick8. 1. Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic address: trappb@ccf.org. 2. Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA. 3. Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 5. Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Pathology, Pathology and Laboratory, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 6. Renovo Neural Inc, Cleveland, OH, USA. 7. Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Gade Lab for Pathology, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. 8. Medicine Institute, Mellen Center for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 9. Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Demyelination of cerebral white matter is thought to drive neuronal degeneration and permanent neurological disability in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Findings from brain MRI studies, however, support the possibility that demyelination and neuronal degeneration can occur independently. We aimed to establish whether post-mortem brains from patients with multiple sclerosis show pathological evidence of cortical neuronal loss that is independent of cerebral white-matter demyelination. METHODS: Brains and spinal cords were removed at autopsy from patients, who had died with multiple sclerosis, at the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, OH, USA. Visual examination of centimetre-thick slices of cerebral hemispheres was done to identify brains without areas of cerebral white-matter discoloration that were indicative of demyelinated lesions (referred to as myelocortical multiple sclerosis) and brains that had cerebral white-matter discolorations or demyelinated lesions (referred to as typical multiple sclerosis). These individuals with myelocortical multiple sclerosis were matched by age, sex, MRI protocol, multiple sclerosis disease subtype, disease duration, and Expanded Disability Status Scale, with individuals with typical multiple sclerosis. Demyelinated lesion area in tissue sections of cerebral white matter, spinal cord, and cerebral cortex from individuals classed as having myelocortical and typical multiple sclerosis were compared using myelin protein immunocytochemistry. Neuronal densities in cortical layers III, V, and VI from five cortical regions not directly connected to spinal cord (cingulate gyrus and inferior frontal cortex, superior temporal cortex, and superior insular cortex and inferior insular cortex) were also compared between the two groups and with aged-matched post-mortem brains from individuals without evidence of neurological disease. FINDINGS: Brains and spinal cords were collected from 100 deceased patients between May, 1998, and November, 2012, and this retrospective study was done between Sept 6, 2011, and Feb 2, 2018. 12 individuals were identified as having myelocortical multiple sclerosis and were compared with 12 individuals identified as having typical multiple sclerosis. Demyelinated lesions were detected in spinal cord and cerebral cortex, but not in cerebral white matter, of people with myelocortical multiple sclerosis. Cortical demyelinated lesion area was similar between myelocortical and typical multiple sclerosis (median 4·45% [IQR 2·54-10·81] in myelocortical vs 9·74% [1·35-19·50] in typical multiple sclerosis; p=0·5512). Spinal cord demyelinated area was significantly greater in typical than in myelocortical multiple sclerosis (median 3·81% [IQR 1·72-7·42] in myelocortical vs 13·81% [6·51-29·01] in typical multiple sclerosis; p=0·0083). Despite the lack of cerebral white-matter demyelination in myelocortical multiple sclerosis, mean cortical neuronal densities were significantly decreased compared with control brains (349·8 neurons per mm2 [SD 51·9] in myelocortical multiple sclerosis vs 419·0 [43·6] in controls in layer III [p=0·0104]; 355·6 [46·5] vs 454·2 [48·3] in layer V [p=0·0006]; 366·6 [50·9] vs 458·3 [48·4] in layer VI [p=0·0049]). By contrast, mean cortical neuronal densities were decreased in typical multiple sclerosis brains compared with those from controls in layer V (392·5 [59·0] vs 454·2 [48·3]; p=0·0182) but not layers III and VI. INTERPRETATION: We propose that myelocortical multiple sclerosis is a subtype of multiple sclerosis that is characterised by demyelination of spinal cord and cerebral cortex but not of cerebral white matter. Cortical neuronal loss is not accompanied by cerebral white-matter demyelination and can be an independent pathological event in myelocortical multiple sclerosis. Compared with control brains, cortical neuronal loss was greater in myelocortical multiple sclerosis cortex than in typical multiple sclerosis cortex. The molecular mechanisms of primary neuronal degeneration and axonal pathology in myelocortical multiple sclerosis should be investigated in future studies. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health and National Multiple Sclerosis Society.
BACKGROUND:Demyelination of cerebral white matter is thought to drive neuronal degeneration and permanent neurological disability in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Findings from brain MRI studies, however, support the possibility that demyelination and neuronal degeneration can occur independently. We aimed to establish whether post-mortem brains from patients with multiple sclerosis show pathological evidence of cortical neuronal loss that is independent of cerebral white-matter demyelination. METHODS: Brains and spinal cords were removed at autopsy from patients, who had died with multiple sclerosis, at the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, OH, USA. Visual examination of centimetre-thick slices of cerebral hemispheres was done to identify brains without areas of cerebral white-matter discoloration that were indicative of demyelinated lesions (referred to as myelocortical multiple sclerosis) and brains that had cerebral white-matter discolorations or demyelinated lesions (referred to as typical multiple sclerosis). These individuals with myelocortical multiple sclerosis were matched by age, sex, MRI protocol, multiple sclerosis disease subtype, disease duration, and Expanded Disability Status Scale, with individuals with typical multiple sclerosis. Demyelinated lesion area in tissue sections of cerebral white matter, spinal cord, and cerebral cortex from individuals classed as having myelocortical and typical multiple sclerosis were compared using myelin protein immunocytochemistry. Neuronal densities in cortical layers III, V, and VI from five cortical regions not directly connected to spinal cord (cingulate gyrus and inferior frontal cortex, superior temporal cortex, and superior insular cortex and inferior insular cortex) were also compared between the two groups and with aged-matched post-mortem brains from individuals without evidence of neurological disease. FINDINGS: Brains and spinal cords were collected from 100 deceased patients between May, 1998, and November, 2012, and this retrospective study was done between Sept 6, 2011, and Feb 2, 2018. 12 individuals were identified as having myelocortical multiple sclerosis and were compared with 12 individuals identified as having typical multiple sclerosis. Demyelinated lesions were detected in spinal cord and cerebral cortex, but not in cerebral white matter, of people with myelocortical multiple sclerosis. Cortical demyelinated lesion area was similar between myelocortical and typical multiple sclerosis (median 4·45% [IQR 2·54-10·81] in myelocortical vs 9·74% [1·35-19·50] in typical multiple sclerosis; p=0·5512). Spinal cord demyelinated area was significantly greater in typical than in myelocortical multiple sclerosis (median 3·81% [IQR 1·72-7·42] in myelocortical vs 13·81% [6·51-29·01] in typical multiple sclerosis; p=0·0083). Despite the lack of cerebral white-matterdemyelination in myelocortical multiple sclerosis, mean cortical neuronal densities were significantly decreased compared with control brains (349·8 neurons per mm2 [SD 51·9] in myelocortical multiple sclerosis vs 419·0 [43·6] in controls in layer III [p=0·0104]; 355·6 [46·5] vs 454·2 [48·3] in layer V [p=0·0006]; 366·6 [50·9] vs 458·3 [48·4] in layer VI [p=0·0049]). By contrast, mean cortical neuronal densities were decreased in typical multiple sclerosis brains compared with those from controls in layer V (392·5 [59·0] vs 454·2 [48·3]; p=0·0182) but not layers III and VI. INTERPRETATION: We propose that myelocortical multiple sclerosis is a subtype of multiple sclerosis that is characterised by demyelination of spinal cord and cerebral cortex but not of cerebral white matter. Cortical neuronal loss is not accompanied by cerebral white-matter demyelination and can be an independent pathological event in myelocortical multiple sclerosis. Compared with control brains, cortical neuronal loss was greater in myelocortical multiple sclerosis cortex than in typical multiple sclerosis cortex. The molecular mechanisms of primary neuronal degeneration and axonal pathology in myelocortical multiple sclerosis should be investigated in future studies. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health and National Multiple Sclerosis Society.
Authors: Roberta Magliozzi; Owain W Howell; Cheryl Reeves; Federico Roncaroli; Richard Nicholas; Barbara Serafini; Francesca Aloisi; Richard Reynolds Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Ives Levesque; John G Sled; Sridar Narayanan; A Carlos Santos; Steven D Brass; Simon J Francis; Douglas L Arnold; G Bruce Pike Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Elizabeth Fisher; Ansi Chang; Robert J Fox; Jean A Tkach; Therese Svarovsky; Kunio Nakamura; Richard A Rudick; Bruce D Trapp Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: N De Stefano; P M Matthews; M Filippi; F Agosta; M De Luca; M L Bartolozzi; L Guidi; A Ghezzi; E Montanari; A Cifelli; A Federico; S M Smith Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-04-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Catherine M Dalton; Declan T Chard; Gerard R Davies; Katherine A Miszkiel; Dan R Altmann; Kryshani Fernando; Gordon T Plant; Alan J Thompson; David H Miller Journal: Brain Date: 2004-03-03 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Dejan Jakimovski; Murali Ramanathan; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Niels Bergsland; Deepa P Ramasamay; Ellen Carl; Michael G Dwyer; Robert Zivadinov Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Farzaneh A Sorond; Shawn Whitehead; Ken Arai; Douglas Arnold; S Thomas Carmichael; Charles De Carli; Marco Duering; Myriam Fornage; Rafael E Flores-Obando; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Edith Hamel; David C Hess; Massafumi Ihara; Majken K Jensen; Hugh S Markus; Axel Montagne; Gary Rosenberg; Andy Y Shih; Eric E Smith; Alex Thiel; Kai Hei Tse; Donna Wilcock; Frank Barone Journal: Geroscience Date: 2019-12-06 Impact factor: 7.713