Lahiru Udayanga1,2, Nayana Gunathilaka3, Mohamed Cassim Mohamed Iqbal4, Kosala Lakmal5, Upali S Amarasinghe6, Wimaladharma Abeyewickreme7. 1. Molecular Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka. 2. Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture & Plantation Management, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Makadura, Sri Lanka. 3. Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka. n.gunathilaka@kln.ac.lk. 4. National Institute of Fundamental Studies, Kandy, Sri Lanka. 5. Regional Director of Health Services Office-Western Province, Colombo, Sri Lanka. 6. Department of Zoology and Environment Management, Faculty of Science, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. 7. Department of Paraclinical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Sir John Kotelawala Defense University, Ratmalana, Sri Lanka.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Comprehensive understanding of risk factors related to socio-economic and demographic status and knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of local communities play a key role in the design and implementation of community-based vector management programmes, along with the identification of gaps in existing control activities. METHODS: A total of 10 Medical Officers of Health (MOH) areas recording high dengue incidence over the last five years were selected from Colombo (n = 5) and Kandy (n = 5) Districts, Sri Lanka. From each MOH area, 200 houses reporting past dengue incidence were selected randomly as test group (n = 1000 for each district) based on the dengue case records available at relevant MOH offices. Information on socio-economic and demographic status and knowledge, attitudes and practices were gathered using an interviewer administered questionnaire. The control group contained 200 households from each MOH area that had not reported any dengue case and the same questionnaire was used for the assessment (n = 1000 for each district). Statistical comparisons between the test and control groups were carried out using the Chi-square test of independence, cluster analysis, analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) and multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) analysis. RESULTS: Significant differences among the test and control groups in terms of basic demographic and socio-economic factors, living standards, knowledge, attitude and practices, were recognized (P < 0.05 at 95% level of confidence). The test group indicated similar risk factors, while the control group also shared more or less similar characteristics as depicted by the findings of cluster analysis and ANOSIM. Findings of the present study highlight the importance of further improvement in community education, motivation and communication gaps, proper coordination and integration of control programmes with relevant entities. Key infrastructural risk factors such as urbanization and waste collection, should be further improved, while vector controlling entities should focus more on the actual conditions represented by the public on knowledge, attitudes and personal protective practices. CONCLUSIONS: The design of flexible and community friendly intervention programmes to ensure the efficacy and sustainability of controlling dengue vectors through community based integrated vector management strategies, is recommended.
BACKGROUND: Comprehensive understanding of risk factors related to socio-economic and demographic status and knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of local communities play a key role in the design and implementation of community-based vector management programmes, along with the identification of gaps in existing control activities. METHODS: A total of 10 Medical Officers of Health (MOH) areas recording high dengue incidence over the last five years were selected from Colombo (n = 5) and Kandy (n = 5) Districts, Sri Lanka. From each MOH area, 200 houses reporting past dengue incidence were selected randomly as test group (n = 1000 for each district) based on the dengue case records available at relevant MOH offices. Information on socio-economic and demographic status and knowledge, attitudes and practices were gathered using an interviewer administered questionnaire. The control group contained 200 households from each MOH area that had not reported any dengue case and the same questionnaire was used for the assessment (n = 1000 for each district). Statistical comparisons between the test and control groups were carried out using the Chi-square test of independence, cluster analysis, analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) and multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) analysis. RESULTS: Significant differences among the test and control groups in terms of basic demographic and socio-economic factors, living standards, knowledge, attitude and practices, were recognized (P < 0.05 at 95% level of confidence). The test group indicated similar risk factors, while the control group also shared more or less similar characteristics as depicted by the findings of cluster analysis and ANOSIM. Findings of the present study highlight the importance of further improvement in community education, motivation and communication gaps, proper coordination and integration of control programmes with relevant entities. Key infrastructural risk factors such as urbanization and waste collection, should be further improved, while vector controlling entities should focus more on the actual conditions represented by the public on knowledge, attitudes and personal protective practices. CONCLUSIONS: The design of flexible and community friendly intervention programmes to ensure the efficacy and sustainability of controlling dengue vectors through community based integrated vector management strategies, is recommended.
Entities:
Keywords:
Dengue; Knowledge attitudes and practices; Risk factors; Socio-economic; Sri Lanka
Authors: M U G Kraemer; T A Perkins; D A T Cummings; R Zakar; S I Hay; D L Smith; R C Reiner Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Steven T Stoddard; Amy C Morrison; Gonzalo M Vazquez-Prokopec; Valerie Paz Soldan; Tadeusz J Kochel; Uriel Kitron; John P Elder; Thomas W Scott Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2009-07-21
Authors: Lahiru Udayanga; Subashinie Aryaprema; Nayana Gunathilaka; M C M Iqbal; Thilan Fernando; W Abeyewickreme Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: N M L Radhika; Nayana Gunathilaka; Lahiru Udayanga; Anuradhani Kasturiratne; Wimaladharma Abeyewickreme Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Grace M Power; Aisling M Vaughan; Luxi Qiao; Nuria Sanchez Clemente; Julia M Pescarini; Enny S Paixão; Ludmila Lobkowicz; Amber I Raja; André Portela Souza; Mauricio Lima Barreto; Elizabeth B Brickley Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2022-04
Authors: Md Siddikur Rahman; Tipaya Ekalaksananan; Sumaira Zafar; Petchaboon Poolphol; Oleg Shipin; Ubydul Haque; Richard Paul; Joacim Rocklöv; Chamsai Pientong; Hans J Overgaard Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 3.390