Literature DB >> 30142980

Differences in Zwitterionic Sulfobetaine and Carboxybetaine Dextran-Based Hydrogels.

Xiaofeng Chen1, Xia Qiu1, Minghong Hou1, Xiaotian Wu1, Yahao Dong1, Yansong Ma1, Lijun Yang2, Yuping Wei1,3.   

Abstract

Zwitterionic sulfobetaine (SB) and carboxybetaine (CB) have been extensively investigated for their noticeable antifouling properties. Both SB and CB have cationic and anionic groups in the molecule, but they differ in negatively charged groups. Molecular simulations have been conducted to investigate the different properties induced by structure changes. However, few studies have focused on the differences between SB and CB materials, especially zwitterionic polysaccharides. Two zwitterionic sulfobetaine and carboxybetaine dextran hydrogels were designed and used as models to compare their properties. Results showed that the equilibrium swelling ratios of the SB-DEX hydrogels were much higher than CB-DEX ones, and larger interior pores were observed in the SB-DEX hydrogels due to their higher hydrophilicity. The rheological storage modulus of the SB-DEX hydrogels was lower than that of CB-DEX ones as a result of higher water content of SB-DEX. These results were consistent with molecular modeling. Additionally, both CB-DEX and SB-DEX had remarkable biocompatibilities, and the in vitro release studies showed that the SB-DEX and CB-DEX hydrogels released DOX in a sustained manner under acidic condition (pH 5.0), indicating their promise as an effective drug-delivery system.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30142980     DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  1 in total

1.  Self-healing zwitterionic sulfobetaine nanocomposite hydrogels with good mechanical properties.

Authors:  Yinlei Lin; Zheng Zeng; Yuhao Li; Sheng Sun; Xiaoting Liu; Deliu He; Guangji Li
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.036

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.