Multi-Spectroscopic and Theoretical Analysis on the Interaction between Human Serum Albumin and a Capsaicin Derivative-RPF101.

The interaction between the main carrier of endogenous and exogenous compounds in the human bloodstream (human serum albumin, HSA) and a potential anticancer compound (the capsaicin analogue RPF101) was investigated by spectroscopic techniques (circular dichroism, steady-state, time-resolved, and synchronous fluorescence), zeta potential, and computational method (molecular docking). Steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence experiments indicated an association in the ground state between HSA:RPF101. The interaction is moderate, spontaneous (ΔG° < 0), and entropically driven (ΔS° = 0.573 ± 0.069 kJ/molK). This association does not perturb significantly the potential surface of the protein, as well as the secondary structure of the albumin and the microenvironment around tyrosine and tryptophan residues. Competitive binding studies indicated Sudlow's site I as the main protein pocket and molecular docking results suggested hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions as the main binding forces.

1. Introduction

Capsaicin is a major component of red pepper, being reported as a potent anticancer compound [1]. However, due to its intrinsic pungent effect through transient receptors potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) [2], to date the therapeutic use of capsaicin is restricted to pain relief by topical application [3]. Using strategies of ligand-based drug design, Tavares et al. [4] and Damião et al. [5] developed a wide number of capsaicin derivatives aiming to enhance their anticancer profile [6,7]. Interestingly, among the active compounds, N-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-ylmethyl) benzenesulfonamide (RPF101, Figure 1) was revealed as a prominent cytotoxic compound, being active against five different breast and skin cancer cell lines, with no associated pungency in vivo [4]. RF101 can induce arrest of the cell cycle at the G2/M phase through a disruption of the microtubule network. Furthermore, it can cause cellular morphologic changes characteristic of apoptosis and a decrease of mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) [4].

Figure 1

(A) Human serum albumin (HSA) structure as cartoon representation and tryptophan-214 (Trp-214) residue as green stick. (B,C) Chemical structure of capsaicin and its analogue RPF101.

Serum albumin (SA) is the most abundant protein in mammalian blood plasma, being synthesized in the liver, where it is produced at a rate of approximately 0.7 mg/h for every gram of liver (i.e., 10–15 g daily) [8]. Due to its high concentration and to the presence of multiple binding pockets, SA is a major transporter of endogenous compounds, including fatty acids, hormones, and metal ions [9]. Human serum albumin (HSA) is the most abundant protein that is present in the human circulatory system (35–50 g/L), having an average half-life of 19 days. The three-dimensional structure of HSA has been elucidated by X-ray analysis and revealed a non-glycosylated heart shaped molecule (66.5 kDa), with dimensions of 80 Å × 80 Å × 80 Å × 30 Å (Figure 1) [10,11]. Human serum albumin structure is composed by three structurally similar domains I–III, each one consisting of two subdomains (A and B), stabilized by 17 disulfide bridges [12]. Human serum albumin is an acidic, very soluble protein that is extremely robust: it is stable in the pH range of 4–9, soluble in 40% ethanol, and can be heated at 60 °C for up to 10 h without deleterious effects. These properties as well as its preferential uptake in tumor and inflamed tissue, ready availability, biodegradability, and the lack of toxicity and immunogenicity make it an ideal candidate for drug delivery [13]. In addition, as most drugs have a poor pharmacokinetic profile and are generally non-specifically distributed in the human body, sometimes causing serious side effects, the development of drug delivery systems intended to specifically target a tumor site becomes a very important issue. When considering that RPF101 is a promising anticancer agent and that albumin is the major component in passive and active tumor targeting in the drug delivery process, the study of the interaction between HSA and RPF101 is of extreme relevancy [14,15].

The present work reports a study of the interaction between HSA and the capsaicin derivative RPF101 using multi-spectroscopic techniques (circular dichroism, steady state, time-resolved, and synchronous fluorescence), zeta potential, and theoretical calculations (molecular docking). Each of the techniques that are employed in this work makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the binding process. The steady-state fluorescence technique indicates the characteristics of the photophysical process that is associated with the HSA:ligand interaction, as well as on the thermodynamic parameters involved in this interaction. On the other hand, time resolved fluorescence is one of the most sensitive spectroscopic techniques and it allows for confirming which main mechanism is operating in the fluorescence quenching process, whereas the structural perturbation that occurs in the microenvironment around the amino acid residues Tyr (tyrosine) and Trp (tryptophan) can be investigated using the synchronous fluorescence technique. Additional information on both the secondary structure and the albumin surface perturbation after ligand binding can be obtained while using the circular dichroism and zeta potential techniques. Finally, molecular modeling may suggest the major binding forces and amino acid residues involved in the interaction between HSA and RPF101. These results will offer a comprehension on the interaction mechanism between HSA—the main carrier of endogenous and exogenous molecules—and the natural product analogue RPF101, contributing to an understanding of distribution and transport involved in the behavior of the cytotoxic compound RPF101—one of the main steps in drug development [16].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Commercially available HSA, warfarin, ibuprofen, digitoxin, and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH = 7.4) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (São Paulo, SP, Brazil). Phosphate-buffered saline solution was obtained by dissolving one tablet in 200 mL of deionized water, yielding 1.00 × 10−2 M of phosphate buffer containing 2.70 × 10−3 M potassium chloride and 1.37 × 10−1 M sodium chloride—pH 7.4 at 298 K. Water used in all the experiments was millipore grade. Methanol (spectroscopic grade) was obtained from Vetec Quimica Fina Ltd. (Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil). The compound RPF101 was synthesized following the procedure that was described in the literature [4]. Briefly, triethylamine and dimethylformamide were added to a dichloromethane solution of piperonylamine. Then benzenesulfonyl chloride (5.0 mmol) was added dropwise under nitrogen atmosphere and stirred for 24 h at room temperature. The organic layer was thoroughly washed, dried over MgSO4, and the solvent was removed under high vacuum. The product RPF101 was obtained after recrystalization from hot hexane:dichloromethane, resulting in a white solid (80.2% yield) with a melting point (m.p.) = 77.1–77.6 °C [4].

2.2. Steady-State Fluorescence Measurements

Steady-state fluorescence was measured on a Jasco J-815 fluorimeter in a quartz cell (1 cm optical path), employing a thermostated cuvette holder Jasco PFD-425S15F (JascoEaston, MD, USA). All spectra were recorded with appropriate background corrections, with number of averaging of three scans for each recorded. In order to compensate the inner filter effect (see Figure S1 in the Supplementary Material), the steady-state fluorescence intensity values for the association HSA:RPF101 was corrected through the absorption of RPF101 at excitation and emission wavelengths, according to Equation (1) [17]:where, F and F are the corrected and observed steady-state fluorescence intensity values, respectively. A and A are the experimental absorbance value at the excitation (molar extinction coefficient at 280 nm−ε = 10,364 M−1 cm−1) and emission wavelength (molar extinction coefficient at 340 nm−ε = 808.75 M−1 cm−1), respectively.

The steady-state fluorescence spectra were measured in the 290–450 nm range, at 296, 303, and 310 K, with excitation wavelength at 280 nm. To a 3.0 mL solution containing an appropriate concentration of HSA (1.00 × 10−5 M), successive aliquots from a stock solution of RPF101 (1.00 × 10−3 M in methanol) were added, with final concentrations of 0.17; 0.33; 0.50; 0.66; 0.83; 0.99; 1.15; 1.32 × 10−5 M. The addition was done manually by using a micro syringe. To investigate a possible perturbation on the steady-state fluorescence and circular dichroism spectra for HSA by adding methanol (solvent used for RPF101), these spectra were recorded without and in the presence of 40 µL of this solvent. No significant effect was observed in both cases (see Figure S2 in the Supplementary Material).

2.3. Time-Resolved Fluorescence Measurements

Time-resolved fluorescence measurements were performed in a model FL920 CD Edinburgh Instruments fluorimeter (Edinburgh, UK) equipped with an electrically pumped laser (EPL) (λexc = 280 ± 10 nm; pulse of 850 ps with energy of 1.8 µW/pulse; monitoring emission at 340 nm). The time range was fixed for 80 ns, with channels 512 (time/ch = 0.09766 ns) and peak counts of 700 counts. Fluorescence decay was obtained for the free HSA solution (1.00 × 10−5 M in PBS) and for a HSA solution containing the maximum concentration of RPF101 used in the steady-state fluorescence studies (1.32 × 10−5 M) at room temperature (ca. 298 K). The instrument response function (IRF) was obtained through the suspension of titanium dioxide (TiO2) in a mix of glycerol and distilled water (proportion 1:5).

2.4. Synchronous Fluorescence Measurements

Synchronous fluorescence (SF) spectra were performed in a model Xe900 Edinburgh Instruments fluorimeter (Edinburgh, UK). Synchronous fluorescence spectrum for HSA (1.00 × 10−5 M) was recorded with increasing concentration of RPF101 in the same concentration range that was used in the steady-state fluorescence studies. The spectra were recorded in the 245–320 nm range by setting constant wavelength interval, Δλ = 60 nm and Δλ = 15 nm for tryptophan and tyrosine residues, respectively, at room temperature (ca. 298 K).

2.5. Zeta Potential Measurements

The surface charge of HSA in the absence and presence of RPF101 was characterized in terms of zeta potential (ZP), using a NanoBrookZetaPALS (Brookhaven Instruments, New York, NY, USA). All measurements were performed with 10 runs at room temperature (ca. 298 K) and the results were reported in terms of ZP ± SD, where SD is the standard deviation. The ZP was measured for HSA solution (1.00 × 10−5 M in PBS solution) without and in the presence of the maximum ligand concentration being used in the steady-state fluorescence experiments (1.32 × 10−5 M) at room temperature (ca. 298 K).

2.6. Circular Dichroism Measurements

Circular dichroism (CD) spectra were measured on a Jasco J-815 spectrometer (Easton, MD, USA), in a 1 cm quartz cell, employing a Jasco PFD-425S15F thermostated cuvette holder. All the spectra were recorded with appropriate background corrections. CD spectra were measured in the 200–260 nm range, at 310 K, using a 1.0 cm path length quartz cuvette, with a 1.0 nm step resolution, and a response time of 1.0 s. The spectra were collected and averaged over three scans. All spectra were baseline corrected by a control sample (3.0 mL of buffer + 40 µL of methanol). Firstly, the spectrum of a free HSA solution (1.00 × 10−6 M in PBS solution) was recorded and then the spectrum resulting from the addition of the amount of RPF101 to obtain the maximum concentration used in the steady-state fluorescence experiments (1.32 × 10−5 M) to the HSA solution was also recorded.

2.7. Drug Displacement Experiment

Competitive binding studies were carried out with three probes widely employed for the characterization of binding sites in HSA, i.e., warfarin, ibuprofen, and digitoxin for site I, II, and III, respectively [18]. HSA and site probes were used at a fixed concentration (1.00 × 10−5 M—proportion 1:1) and the fluorescence quenching titration with RPF101 was performed, as described previously in the steady-state fluorescence quenching method at 310 K.

2.8. Molecular Docking Studies

The crystallographic structure of HSA was obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with access code 1N5U [19]. This structure has a resolution of 1.90 Å. The RPF101 structure was built and energy-minimized with the density functional theory (DFT), method Becke-3-Lee Yang Parr (B3LYP) with the standard 6-31G* basis set available in the Spartan’14 program (Wavefunction, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA). Molecular docking was performed with the GOLD 5.2 program (CCDC) [20]. The scoring function used was ‘ChemPLP’, which is the default function of the GOLD 5.2 program [21]. Hydrogen atoms were added to HSA according to the data inferred by GOLD 5.2 program on the ionization and tautomeric states. Docking interaction cavity in the protein was established with a 10 Å radius from the Trp-214 residue. The number of genetic operations (crossover, migration, mutation) in each docking run that was used in the search procedure was set to 100,000. The figure of the best docking pose for each sample was generated by the PyMOL Delano Scientific LLC program. Further details can be found in previous publications [17,22].

3. Results

3.1. Steady-State and Time-Resolved Fluorescence Quenching

According to the literature, of the twenty naturally occurring amino acids that make all proteins, three of them contain aromatic ring side chains, and therefore are intrinsically able to display fluorescence emission: Trp, Tyr, and phenylalanine (Phe). Upon 280 nm excitation, the fluorescence from albumin is originated mainly from the dominant source of absorption and emission—the indole group of tryptophan residues (ε = 5600 M−1 cm−1)—compared with phenylalanine (ε = 200 M−1 cm−1) or tyrosine (ε = 1400 M−1 cm−1) [23]. Human serum albumin has a single tryptophan residue (Trp-214) that is located in a hydrophobic cavity inside the subdomain IIA, known as Sudlow’s site I. The intrinsic fluorescence emitted by Trp-214 is very sensitive to the environment around this amino acid residue. Tryptophan fluorescence has been employed frequently in the study of HSA interaction with different biological molecules, i.e., fatty acids and commercial and potential drugs [12,19]. Previous studies have shown that a solution of HSA in PBS (pH = 7.4) has a strong fluorescence emission at 340 nm when excited at 280 nm [24]. Successive addition of RPF101 to the HSA solution led to the effective fluorescence quenching of Trp-214, while both emission maximum and peak shape remained largely unchanged (Figure 2). This result indicates that the ligand can quench the internal fluorescence of the albumin and the absence of significant blue or red shift in the maximum of fluorescence is indicative that RPF101 does not change the environment in the vicinity of the fluorophores [21].

Figure 2

Steady-state fluorescence emission spectra for free human serum album (HSA) and its fluorescence quenching by addition of successive aliquots of RPF101 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution at 310 K. [HSA] = 1.00 × 10−5 M and [RPF101] = 0.17; 0.33; 0.50; 0.66; 0.83; 0.99; 1.15; 1.32 × 10−5 M. Inset: Stern-Volmer plots for the fluorescence quenching of HSA by RPF101 at 296, 303 and 310 K.

A variety of molecular interactions can result in two different quenching mechanisms of a fluorescent species, i.e., dynamic or static. These interactions include ground-state complex formation, collisional quenching, excited state reactions, molecular rearrangement and energy transfer. Dynamic and static quenching can be distinguished by their different dependence on temperature and viscosity, or preferably by lifetime measurements [25]. In general, Stern-Volmer analysis (Equation (2) and inset in the Figure 2), as well as the known relationship between k and K (Equation (3)), is useful in the estimation of the accessibility of the quencher molecule to the tryptophan residue in proteins as well as in the understanding of the mechanism that is involved in the quenching process [26]: where, F0 and F are the fluorescence intensities of HSA without and in the presence of RPF101, respectively. K and k are the Stern-Volmer quenching constant and bimolecular quenching rate constant, respectively. [Q] is the RPF101 concentration and τ is the fluorescence lifetime of HSA without the presence of RPF101—the measured mean value for the fluorescence lifetime of HSA was (5.78 ± 0.15) × 10−9 s; see time-resolved fluorescence studies.

Table 1 shows the K and k values for HSA:RPF101. Since the obtained K values decrease with the increase of temperature and the bimolecular quenching rate constant values (k ≈ 1012 M−1 s−1) are three orders of magnitude larger than the diffusion rate constant (k ≈ 7.40 × 109 M−1 s−1, at 298 K, according to Smoluchowski-Stokes-Einstein theory) [27], the probable mechanism of fluorescence quenching is static, implying a ground-state association between the fluorophore (albumin) and the quencher (RPF101) [28]. In order to further confirm which type of fluorescence quenching mechanism is involved on the HSA:RPF101 interaction, time-resolved fluorescence measurements were performed for HSA without and in the presence of RPF101. Figure 3 depicts the fluorescence lifetime decay profiles for the native HSA and HSA associated with RPF101.

Table 1

Stern-Volmer quenching constant (K), bimolecular quenching rate constant (k), modified Stern-Volmer binding constant (K) and thermodynamic parameters (ΔH°, ΔS°, and ΔG°) for HSA:RPF101 at 296, 303, and 310 K a.

T (K)	KSV (M−1)	kq (M−1 s−1)	Ka (M−1)	ΔH° (kJ/mol)	ΔS° (kJ/molK)	ΔG° (kJ/mol)
296	(1.47 ± 0.04) × 104	2.54 × 1012	(3.70 ± 0.26) × 103			−20.6
303	(1.45 ± 0.02) × 104	2.50 × 1012	(1.08 ± 0.26) × 104	149 ± 20	0.573 ± 0.069	−24.6
310	(1.33 ± 0.02) × 104	2.30 × 1012	(5.79 ± 0.26) × 104			−28.6

a: r2 for K and k: 0.9988–0.9945; r2 for K: 0.9976–0.9842; r2 for ΔH°, ΔS° and ΔG°: 0.9618.

Figure 3

Time-resolved fluorescence decays and residuals for HSA without and in the presence of RPF101 in PBS solution, at room temperature. [HSA] = 1.00 × 10−5 M and [RPF101] = 1.32 × 10−5 M.

The fluorescence decays of HSA upon 280 nm excitation, at pH 7.4, were well-fitted assuming two exponentials having lifetimes of 1.52 ± 0.11 ns (22.0%) and 5.78 ± 0.15 ns (78.0%) (χ2 = 1.102). The experimental fluorescence lifetimes are in good agreement with the literature [29,30,31]. No significant changes in the HSA fluorescence lifetimes were observed in the presence of RPF101, when values of 1.58 ± 0.14 ns and 5.72 ± 0.13 ns (χ2 = 1.135) were obtained. Thus, the ratio between the fluorescence lifetimes of HSA in the absence and presence of RPF101 are close to unity, suggesting that the fluorescence quenching occurs through a static mechanism [32]. These results are in agreement with those that were obtained above by the Stern-Volmer analysis (Table 1).

There are two basic mechanisms for electronic energy transfer: electron exchange (Dexter) and dipole interaction (Förster). The efficiency of the former falls off exponentially with the distance between fluorophore and quencher, so it only operates at very short distances, essentially by contact; for the Förster mechanism, efficiency decreases with 1/r6, so it is still operational at ~10 Å [33]. Thus, Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a non-radiative process: through-space coupling between the oscillating electronic dipole of the excited energy donor (Trp fluorophore in HSA) and that of the ground-state acceptor (quencher-RPF101) results in the de-excitation of the former and electronic excitation of the latter: transference of a “virtual”, rather than “real” photon. As a result, the donor fluorophore returns to its ground state, without emission of fluorescence, while the acceptor quencher is promoted to its excited state [21]. Therefore, the quenching of the fluorophore by FRET can occurs if there is an overlap between the fluorophore emission and quencher absorption spectra. In Figure S3 in the Supplementary Material, such overlap between the fluorescence emission spectrum of HSA and the absorption spectrum of RPF101 can be clearly seen, indicating the possible occurrence of an energy transfer process between the fluorophore in protein and the ground state of RPF101 [. But, the absence of any change in the fluorescence lifetime of HSA after the addition of RPF101 indicates that FRET is not operating in the present case [23].

From the pharmacological point of view, if the drugs are metabolized and excreted from the body too fast because of low protein binding, they will not be able to provide their therapeutic effects. On the other hand, if drugs bind too strongly to protein and are metabolized and excreted too slowly, the in vivo half-life of these drugs can increase excessively, and this may lead to undesired side effects and/or toxicity [35]. To obtain information about the association between HSA and RPF101, the modified Stern-Volmer binding constant (K) was calculated while employing the Figure 4 and Equation (4):where, F0 and F are the fluorescence intensities of HSA without and in the presence of RPF101 at 340 nm, respectively. [Q] is the RPF101 concentration and f is the fraction of the initial fluorescence that is accessible to quenchers (f ≈ 1.00). The K values for the association HSA:RPF101 are in the range of 103–104 M−1, showing a moderate interaction between the potential drug RPF101 and HSA [36,37] (Table 1), suggesting that RPF101 can be stored and carried by the protein in the human bloodstream [38,39]. The increase of K values with the increase of temperature indicates that the protein structure can better accommodate the ligand at 310 K (human body temperature) than at 296 K, which is probably due to binding pocket being more accessible by the quenchers at 310 K.

Figure 4

Modified Stern-Volmer plots for the association HSA:RPF101 in PBS solution at 296, 303 and 310 K. Inset: Van’t Hoff plot for HSA:RPF101 at three different temperatures. [HSA] = 1.00 × 10−5 M and [RPF101] = 0.17; 0.33; 0.50; 0.66; 0.83; 0.99; 1.15; 1.32 × 10−5 M.

In general, the main interaction forces between endogenous and exogenous molecules with proteins can include hydrophobic interaction, hydrogen bond, van der Waals, and electrostatic forces. These intermolecular interactions can be related to the thermodynamic parameters ΔG°, ΔH° and ΔS° [40], which can be obtained applying the van’t Hoff analysis (Equation (5) and inset in the Figure 4) and the Gibbs free energy analysis (Equation (6)) [39]. where, ΔH°, ΔS°, ΔG° are the enthalpy, entropy, and Gibbs free energy change, respectively. R is the gas constant (R = 8.314 × 10−3 kJ/mol K), T is the temperature (296, 303 and 310 K), and K the modified Stern-Volmer binding constant. Negative values for ΔG° are in further accord with the spontaneity of the binding process between HSA and RPF101. The unfavorable positive ΔH° can be compensated by the positive ΔS°, which indicate a hydrophobic interaction [41] and suggest that the binding process is entropically driven [42].

3.2. Synchronous Fluorescence Spectroscopy

In the synchronous fluorescence (SF) spectra, the sensitivity that is associated with fluorescence is maintained, while several advantages are available: spectral simplification, spectral bandwidth reduction, and avoidance of different perturbing effects [18]. By scanning the excitation and emission monochromators simultaneously, while maintaining a constant wavelength interval (Δλ) between them, characteristic information about the molecular environment in the vicinity of a chromophore can be obtained [43]. The SF spectra of HSA for tyrosine (Δλ = 15 nm) and tryptophan residues (Δλ = 60 nm) in the presence of various concentrations of RPF101 are shown in Figure 5. This figure clearly shows that in both cases there is no significant Stokes’ shift at the maximum fluorescence emission after successive additions of RPF101 to the HSA solution, suggesting that there is no significant change on the HSA structure upon ligand binding that can perturb the microenvironment around the Tyr and Trp residues [21,44].

Figure 5

Synchronous fluorescence spectra for HSA without and in the presence of RPF101 at Δλ = 15 nm (A) and Δλ = 60 nm (B) in PBS solution. [HSA] = 1.00 × 10−5 M and [RPF101] = 0.17; 0.33; 0.50; 0.66; 0.83; 0.99; 1.15; 1.32 × 10−5 M.

3.3. Zeta Potential Studies

Changes in the zeta potential (ZP, ζ) for a protein can mainly imply in conformational changes and/or unfolding/denaturation processes on the protein structure. Therefore, the ZP of a protein can be used as an indicator of the protein stability upon ligand binding [45]. The experimental ZP for free HSA was negative (ζ ≈ −7.50 ± 2.76 mV, conductance ≈ 30,232 µS, and electric field ≈ 13.60 V/cm) at pH = 7.4 in PBS buffer solution. On the other hand, upon the addition of RPF101 (1.32 × 10−5 M), the ZP was ζ ≈ −9.50 ± 1.90 mV, conductance ≈ 28,865 µS, and electric field ≈ 14.30 V/cm. It is worth to note that the ZP value for HSA before and after addition of RPF101 is the same inside the experimental error of the measurements, indicating that there is no significant structural change on the protein surface upon ligand addition [46].

3.4. Change on the Protein Secondary Structure Induced by RPF101 Binding

Circular dichroism (CD) spectra of HSA exhibited negative bands at 208 and 222 nm, corresponding to π-π* and n-π* transitions, respectively, which are characteristic of the α-helix structure units of the protein [47]. Upon the addition of RPF101 (1.32 × 10−5 M) to the albumin solution, a small decrease in the intensity of the absorptions at 208 and 222 nm was observed (Figure 6), indicating a very weak change on the secondary structure of HSA [48].

Figure 6

Circular dichroism spectra for HSA without and in the presence of RPF101 in PBS buffer solution (pH = 7.4) at 310 K. [HSA] = 1.00 × 10−6 M and [RPF101] = 1.32 × 10−5 M.

Circular dichroism results can be expressed in terms of significant molar residual ellipticity (MRE) in degcm2/dmol, calculated according to Equation (7):where, θ is the observed ellipticity (mdeg); n is the number of amino acid residues (585 to HSA) [49]; l is the length of the optical cuvette (1 cm); and C is the molar concentration of HSA (1.00 × 10−6 M). The loss of helical structure due to ligand binding can also be quantitatively calculated as contents of free and combined HSA from MRE values at 208 and 222 nm, while applying Equations (8) and (9), respectively: where, MRE208 and MRE222 are the significant molar residual ellipticities (degcm2/dmol) at 208 and 222 nm, respectively. The α-helix content of the secondary structure of HSA in the absence of RPF101 has its maximum at about 57.5% and 53.9% at 208 and 222 nm, respectively, while in the presence of RPF101, the α-helix content decreased at about 55.3% and 52.1% at 208 and 222 nm, respectively. Thus, it may be concluded from the CD results that the binding HSA:RPF101 can occur with a very weak change on the secondary structure of the protein [36,50].

3.5. Competitive Binding Studies

In general, the main regions of small molecules binding sites on HSA are located in the hydrophobic cavities in subdomains IIA and IIIA, which are also referred as Sudlow’s site I and site II, respectively, according to the terminology that was proposed by Sudlow and coworkers [51]. Furthermore, the hydrophilic cavity located in subdomain IB, which can be referred as site III, is also considered as a possible protein pocket for small molecules [18]. In order to identify the main protein cavity for the association HSA:RPF101, competitive binding studies were performed at 310 K using different site probes, like warfarin, ibuprofen, and digitoxin for sites I, II, and III, respectively [36].

The K values determined by Equation (4) and Figure 7 for HSA:RPF101 in the presence of 1.00 × 10−5 M warfarin, ibuprofen, or digitoxin at 310 K are shown in Table 2. From the results that are shown in this table, it can be seen that the HSA:RPF101 binding in the presence of warfarin was reduced by 71.8% when compared to HSA:RPF101, without any site marker. On the other hand, in the presence of digitoxin and ibuprofen, the decrease in K value was much smaller−21.5% and 11.9%, respectively. This is a clear indication that RPF101 competes with warfarin for the subdomain IIA, where the Trp-214 residue can be found [18,21,36].

Figure 7

Modified Stern-Volmer plot for the interaction HSA:RPF101 in the presence of each site marker: warfarin, ibuprofen and digitoxin (1.00 × 10−5 M). [HSA] = [warfarin] = [ibuprofen] = [digitoxin] = 1.00 × 10−6 M and [RPF101] = 0.17; 0.33; 0.50; 0.66; 0.83; 0.99; 1.15; 1.32 × 10−5 M.

Table 2

K value for the interaction HSA:RPF101 without and in the presence of warfarin, ibuprofen, or digitoxin at 310 K a.

Sample	Ka (M−1)	Ka (M−1)	Ka (M−1)	Ka (M−1)
	Without Site Marker	Presence Warfarin	Presence Ibuprofen	Presence Digitoxin
RPF101	(5.79 ± 0.26) × 104	(1.63 ± 0.26) × 104	(5.10 ± 0.26) × 104	(4.55 ± 0.26) × 104

a: r2 for K: 0.9960–0.9987.

3.6. Molecular Docking Studies for the Interaction HSA:RPF101

The spectroscopic results that are described above indicated that the main binding site for RPF101 in the HSA structure is Sudlow’s site I, in subdomain IIA, where Trp-214 residue can be found. Thus, this protein pocket was chosen for performing computational experiments that aimed to provide a more detailed (atomistic view) of the binding interaction.

The molecular docking results suggested that hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions are the main forces for the association HSA:RPF101 (Figure 8). Both oxygen atoms of the methylenedioxolyl moiety of RPF101 are acceptors of hydrogen bonding for arginine-221 (Arg-221) and lysine-443 (Lys-443) residues, within a distance of 2.08 Å and 3.65 Å, respectively. The hydrogen atom of the sulfonamide linker of RPF101 is a possible donor for hydrogen bonding with the aspartic acid-450 (Asp-450) residue within a distance of 2.10 Å, whereas the sulfone can interact with the hydroxyl group of the serine-453 (Ser-453) side chain via hydrogen bonding within a distance of 1.82 Å.

Figure 8

The best score pose for the interaction HSA:RPF101 in Sudlow’s site I, as obtained by molecular docking (ChemPLP function). RPF101 structure, selected hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acid residues are represented in beige, yellow and brown, respectively. Green color is the HSA structure (PDB:1N5U). Elements colors: hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur are represented in white, red, blue, and goldenrod, respectively. Arginine: Arg; aspartic acid: Asp; lysine: Lys; tryptophan: Trp; serine: Ser; leucine: Leu; valine: Val.

Finally, molecular docking results also suggested hydrophobic interactions via π-stacking between the Trp-214 residue and the phenyl ring of RPF101 attached to the sulfonamide linker, within a distance of 3.50 Å. This very same aromatic ring can interact with the amino acid residues valine-343 (Val-343) and leucine-480 (Leu-480) within distances of 2.78 Å and 1.60 Å, respectively. Overall, the molecular docking results are in good agreement with the experimental data discussed above.

4. Discussion

In the literature, there is a reasonable amount or work describing the interaction between HSA:natural products and HSA:natural products analogues, such as mangiferin [52], kaempferol [49], wogonin [39], pheophytin [26], and flanovoids [21,53]. In the case of natural products that are extracted from peppers and its analogues, it was only explored the interaction between serum albumin and 1-piperoyl piperidine (piperine) [54,55]. Since there are few investigations on the interaction between serum albumin and natural products analogues from peppers components, as well as the application of multi-spectroscopic techniques combined with theoretical methods can be used as an initial process for the evaluation of some pharmacokinetic profile of potential drugs, the present discussion is focused on the interaction HSA:RFP101 by circular dichroism, steady-state, time-resolved, and synchronous fluorescence combined with zeta potential and theoretical calculations.

The Stern-Volmer analysis applied in the steady-state fluorescence data indicated a decrease in the K values with increasing of temperature and the k values are three orders of magnitude higher than k. These observations can indicate a ground state association between HSA and RPF101 (static fluorescence quenching mechanism). To get more insight into the fluorescence mechanism of RPF101 to serum albumin, the time-resolved fluorescence technique was employed. This technique revealed that the fluorescence decays for HSA are composed by two different lifetimes being the second one the most contribution. Since the fluorescence lifetimes for HSA without and in the presence of the ligand (RPF101) are the same inside the experimental error, i.e., τ2 = 5.78 ± 0.15 and τ2 = 5.72 ± 0.13 ns, respectively, the static fluorescence quenching mechanism can be confirmed.

The binding affinity of any substance to serum albumin is one of the major factors that determine the pharmacokinetics i.e., time course of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Since the modified Stern-Volmer binding constant values are in the order of 103–104 M−1, there is an indicative of moderate binding affinity between HSA and RPF101 [56]. Since, ΔG° values for the interaction HSA:RPF101 are negative, thus indicating a spontaneous process. The positive values for ΔH° and ΔS° are indicative of a binding process that is controlled by entropy [31]. According to the Gibbs free energy equation, a positive enthalpy change is not favorable for the spontaneity of the binding process, unlike a positive entropy change that leads to a more negative value for the Gibbs free energy. From Ross and Subramanian theory [41] positive values for enthalpy and entropy change suggest hydrophobic interaction as the main intermolecular force that is involved in the binding process. These association parameters indicated that RPF101 presented similar binding ability toward HSA when compared to piperine [55].

The steady-state fluorescence spectrum of HSA presented maximum fluorescence emission at 340 nm. Upon successive additions of RPF101 to HSA solution fluorescence quenching can be observed without any blue or red shift (Stokes’ shift), indicating that the ligand binding does not perturb significantly the fluorophore environment [21,22]. In order to confirm this result, synchronous fluorescence (SF) spectra was carried out at Δλ = 15 and 60 nm. In the SF spectra, a decrease in fluorescence intensity without any shift is an indicative that there is no significant changes on the HSA structure upon ligand binding, which can perturb the microenvironment around Tyr and Trp residues [18].

The binding of RPF101 to HSA structure could cause some modifications on the surface and secondary structure of the albumin, which could reflect in an inactivation of the protein activity. According to zeta potential results (ζ ≈ −7.50 ± 2.76 and −9.50 ± 1.90 mV, for HSA and HSA:RPF101, respectively), there is a clear indication that the binding of the ligand does not perturb the protein surface (ζ without and in the presence of RPF101 are the same inside the experimental error) [46]. Circular dichroism results indicated a very weak perturbation on the secondary structure of the albumin upon ligand binding (variation of 2.20% and 1.80% at 208 and 222 nm, respectively) [37]. Thus, besides the presence of the capsaicin analogue does not perturb the microenvironment around Trp and Tyr residues it does not significantly perturb the surface and secondary structure of the albumin.

HSA structure has three main binding sites, which are located in the subdomain IIA (site I), IIIA (site II), and IB (site III) [51,56]. Competitive binding studies in the presence of three commercial site markers (warfarin, ibuprofen, and digitoxin) suggested site I, which is also known as Sudlow’s site I, as the main protein binding pocket for RPF101 (K value without and in the presence of warfarin changed 71.8% at 310 K). The same binding pocket was also identified for piperine, which has the same (1,3)-benzodioxolyl moiety and close ClogP values (theoretical octanol/water partition coefficient) as compared to RPF101 (2.15 and 2.78, respectively) [4,55]. In order to offer an atomic view of the interaction HSA:RPF101, theoretical calculations via molecular docking were carried out. Molecular docking results suggested hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding as the main binding forces in the association HSA:RPF101 in the subdomain IIA. There are chemical groups in the ligand structure that are possible acceptors for hydrogen bonding with Arg-221, Lys-443, and Ser-453 residues. On the other hand, the amino acid residue Asp-450 is a potential acceptor for hydrogen bonding with the ligand structure. Finally, hydrophobic interactions were also suggested between RPF101 and three amino acid residues: Trp-214, Val-343, and Leu-480. Note that the experimental data obtained from steady-state fluorescence measurements indicated the interaction HSA:RPF101 as essentially entropically driven, while molecular docking results, which give evidences from an atomic point of view, suggested entropic and enthalpic contributions. Thus, RPF101 can interact with albumin essentially controlled by entropic effects, however, the enthalpic contribution can also be involved in this association. Overall, the capsaicin analogue presented good binding ability toward HSA, indicating high probability to be carried in the human bloodstream.

5. Conclusions

Fluorescence quenching studies of HSA by RPF101 showed K and k values that led us to conclude that the fluorescence quenching occurs via a static mechanism, which indicates the presence of a ground state association HSA:RPF101. This conclusion was supported by time-resolved fluorescence results. The interaction HSA:RPF101 is moderate (K ≈ 103–104 M−1), entropically driven, spontaneous and does not significantly change the potential surface of the protein, as well as the environment around tyrosine and tryptophan residues. The CD results indicated that upon ligand binding there is a very weak perturbation on the secondary structure of the albumin. Competitive binding studies indicated Sudlow’s site I—located in the subdomain IIA—as the main protein pocket for this association. Molecular docking results suggested that the ligand interacts via hydrogen bonding with Arg-221, Lys-443, Asp-450, and Ser-453 residues and also via hydrophobic interactions with Trp-214, Val-343, and Leu-480 residues. At comparing spectroscopic and molecular docking results the interaction HSA:RPF101 is essentially controlled by entropic effects, however, the enthalpic contribution can also be an evidences involved in this association. Overall, the potential drug RPF101 can be carried and distributed by HSA in the human bloodstream.