Literature DB >> 30142557

Evaluation of machine learning techniques with multiple remote sensing datasets in estimating monthly concentrations of ground-level PM2.5.

Yongming Xu1, Hung Chak Ho2, Man Sing Wong3, Chengbin Deng4, Yuan Shi5, Ta-Chien Chan6, Anders Knudby7.   

Abstract

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has been recognized as a key air pollutant that can influence population health risk, especially during extreme cases such as wildfires. Previous studies have applied geospatial techniques such as land use regression to map the ground-level PM2.5, while some recent studies have found that Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) derived from satellite images and machine learning techniques may be two elements that can improve spatiotemporal prediction. However, there has been a lack of studies evaluating use of different machine learning techniques with AOD datasets for mapping PM2.5, especially in areas with high spatiotemporal variability of PM2.5. In this study, we compared the performance of eight predictive algorithms with the use of multiple remote sensing datasets, including satellite-derived AOD data, for the prediction of ground-level PM2.5 concentration. Based on the results, Cubist, random forest and eXtreme Gradient Boosting were the algorithms with better performance, while Cubist was the best (CV-RMSE = 2.64 μg/m3, CV-R2 = 0.48). Variable importance analysis indicated that the predictors with the highest contributions in modelling were monthly AOD and elevation. In conclusion, appropriate selection of machine learning algorithms can improve ground-level PM2.5 estimation, especially for areas with nonlinear relationships between PM2.5 and predictors caused by complex terrain. Satellite-derived data such as AOD and land surface temperature (LST) can also be substitutes for traditional datasets retrieved from weather stations, especially for areas with sparse and uneven distribution of stations.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30142557     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  7 in total

1.  Mapping Modeled Exposure of Wildland Fire Smoke for Human Health Studies in California.

Authors:  Patricia D Koman; Michael Billmire; Kirk R Baker; Ricardo de Majo; Frank J Anderson; Sumi Hoshiko; Brian J Thelen; Nancy H F French
Journal:  Atmosphere (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Integration of Remote Sensing and Social Sensing Data in a Deep Learning Framework for Hourly Urban PM2.5 Mapping.

Authors:  Huanfeng Shen; Man Zhou; Tongwen Li; Chao Zeng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Mapping wind erosion hazard with regression-based machine learning algorithms.

Authors:  Hamid Gholami; Aliakbar Mohammadifar; Dieu Tien Bui; Adrian L Collins
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  COVID-19 driven changes in the air quality; a study of major cities in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh.

Authors:  Dipesh Kumar; Anil Kumar Singh; Vaibhav Kumar; R Poyoja; Ashok Ghosh; Bhaskar Singh
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 5.  Bulk Processing of Multi-Temporal Modis Data, Statistical Analyses and Machine Learning Algorithms to Understand Climate Variables in the Indian Himalayan Region.

Authors:  Mohd Anul Haq; Prashant Baral; Shivaprakash Yaragal; Biswajeet Pradhan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Assessment of urban air quality from Twitter communication using self-attention network and a multilayer classification model.

Authors:  Thushara Sudheish Kumbalaparambi; Ratish Menon; Vishnu P Radhakrishnan; Vinod P Nair
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.190

7.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Borne Sensor System for Atmosphere-Particulate-Matter Measurements: Design and Experiments.

Authors:  Tonghua Wang; Wenting Han; Mengfei Zhang; Xiaomin Yao; Liyuan Zhang; Xingshuo Peng; Chaoqun Li; Xvjia Dan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.