Vincent Wai-Sun Wong1, Grace Lai-Hung Wong1, Ruth Suk-Mei Chan2, Sally She-Ting Shu1, Bernice Ho-Ki Cheung2, Liz Sin Li2, Angel Mei-Ling Chim1, Carmen Ka-Man Chan1, Julie Ka-Yu Leung1, Winnie Chiu-Wing Chu3, Jean Woo2, Henry Lik-Yuen Chan4. 1. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 2. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Centre for Nutritional Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 3. Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 4. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Electronic address: hlychan@cuhk.edu.hk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Around 10-20% of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are non-obese. The benefit of weight reduction in such patients is unclear. We aim to study the efficacy of lifestyle intervention in non-obese patients with NAFLD and to identify factors that predict treatment response. METHODS: A total of 154 community NAFLD patients were randomised to a 12-month lifestyle intervention programme involving regular exercise, or to standard care. The primary outcome was remission of NAFLD at Month 12 by proton-magnetic resonance spectroscopy. After the programme, the patients were prospectively followed until Year 6. The Asian body mass index (BMI) cut-off of 25 kg/m2 was used to define non-obese NAFLD. RESULTS: Patients were assigned to the intervention (n = 77) and control (n = 77) groups (39 and 38 in each group had baseline BMI <25 and ≥25 kg/m2, respectively). More patients in the intervention group achieved the primary outcome than the control group regardless of baseline BMI (non-obese: 67% vs. 18%, p <0.001; obese: 61% vs. 21%, p <0.001). Lifestyle intervention, lower baseline intrahepatic triglyceride, and reduction in body weight and waist circumference were independent factors associated with remission of NAFLD in non-obese patients. Half of non-obese patients achieved remission of NAFLD with 3-5% weight reduction; the same could only be achieved in obese patients with 7-10% weight reduction. By Year 6, non-obese patients in the intervention group remained more likely to maintain weight reduction and alanine aminotransferase normalisation than the control group. CONCLUSIONS:Lifestyle intervention is effective in treating NAFLD in both non-obese and obese patients. Weight reduction predicts remission of NAFLD in non-obese patients, but a modest weight reduction may be sufficient in this population. LAY SUMMARY: Some patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are non-obese. The optimal management of such patients is unclear. In this long-term follow-up study of a clinical trial, we show that remission of NAFLD can be achieved in 67% of non-obese patients after lifestyle intervention. The majority of patients can achieve NAFLD remission with modest weight loss of 3-10%. Non-obese patients are also more likely than obese patients to maintain weight reduction and normal liver enzymes in the long run.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Around 10-20% of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are non-obese. The benefit of weight reduction in such patients is unclear. We aim to study the efficacy of lifestyle intervention in non-obesepatients with NAFLD and to identify factors that predict treatment response. METHODS: A total of 154 community NAFLD patients were randomised to a 12-month lifestyle intervention programme involving regular exercise, or to standard care. The primary outcome was remission of NAFLD at Month 12 by proton-magnetic resonance spectroscopy. After the programme, the patients were prospectively followed until Year 6. The Asian body mass index (BMI) cut-off of 25 kg/m2 was used to define non-obese NAFLD. RESULTS:Patients were assigned to the intervention (n = 77) and control (n = 77) groups (39 and 38 in each group had baseline BMI <25 and ≥25 kg/m2, respectively). More patients in the intervention group achieved the primary outcome than the control group regardless of baseline BMI (non-obese: 67% vs. 18%, p <0.001; obese: 61% vs. 21%, p <0.001). Lifestyle intervention, lower baseline intrahepatic triglyceride, and reduction in body weight and waist circumference were independent factors associated with remission of NAFLD in non-obesepatients. Half of non-obesepatients achieved remission of NAFLD with 3-5% weight reduction; the same could only be achieved in obesepatients with 7-10% weight reduction. By Year 6, non-obesepatients in the intervention group remained more likely to maintain weight reduction and alanine aminotransferase normalisation than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle intervention is effective in treating NAFLD in both non-obese and obesepatients. Weight reduction predicts remission of NAFLD in non-obesepatients, but a modest weight reduction may be sufficient in this population. LAY SUMMARY: Some patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are non-obese. The optimal management of such patients is unclear. In this long-term follow-up study of a clinical trial, we show that remission of NAFLD can be achieved in 67% of non-obesepatients after lifestyle intervention. The majority of patients can achieve NAFLD remission with modest weight loss of 3-10%. Non-obesepatients are also more likely than obesepatients to maintain weight reduction and normal liver enzymes in the long run.
Authors: Mohammed Eslam; Shiv K Sarin; Vincent Wai-Sun Wong; Jian-Gao Fan; Takumi Kawaguchi; Sang Hoon Ahn; Ming-Hua Zheng; Gamal Shiha; Yusuf Yilmaz; Rino Gani; Shahinul Alam; Yock Young Dan; Jia-Horng Kao; Saeed Hamid; Ian Homer Cua; Wah-Kheong Chan; Diana Payawal; Soek-Siam Tan; Tawesak Tanwandee; Leon A Adams; Manoj Kumar; Masao Omata; Jacob George Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 6.047