Literature DB >> 30142405

The 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Assay Predicts Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy Independent of PTEN Status.

Cristina Magi-Galluzzi1, Sudhir Isharwal2, Sara M Falzarano3, Athanasios Tsiatis4, Anne Dee4, Tara Maddala4, Dejan Knezevic4, Phillip G Febbo4, Jeffrey Lawrence4, Eric A Klein5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the ability of loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and Genomic prostate score assay (GPS) in predicting the biochemical-recurrence (BCR) and clinical-recurrence (CR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa).
METHODS: Three hundred seventy seven patients with and without CR were retrospectively selected by stratified cohort sampling design from RP database. PTEN status (by immunohistochemistry [IHC] and fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH]) and GPS results were determined for RP specimens. BCR was defined as Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ≥ 0.2 ng/mL or initiation of salvage therapy for a rising PSA. CR was defined as local recurrence and/or distant metastases.
RESULTS: Baseline mean age, PSA, and GPS score for the cohort were 61.1 years, 8 ng/dL, and 32.8. PTEN loss was noted in 38% patients by FISH and 25% by IHC. The concordance between FISH and IHC for PTEN loss was 66% (Kappa coefficient 0.278; P < .001). On univariable analysis, loss of PTEN by FISH or IHC was associated with BCR and CR (P < .05). However, after adjusting for GPS results, PTEN loss was not a significant predictor for CR or BCR (P > .1). The GPS result remained strongly associated with CR and BCR after adjusting for PTEN status (P < .001). PTEN status and GPS results only weakly correlated. GPS was widely distributed regardless of PTEN status indicating the biological heterogeneity of PCa even in PTEN-deficient cases.
CONCLUSION: GPS is a significant predictor of aggressive PCa, independent of PTEN status. After adjustment for GPS results, PTEN was not independently associated with recurrence for PCa.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30142405     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  The impact of PTEN deletion and ERG rearrangement on recurrence after treatment for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Liu; J Zhou; S Xia; T Li
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  The Pros and Cons of Incorporating Transcriptomics in the Age of Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Victor T G Lin; Eddy S Yang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Optimal Use of Tumor-Based Molecular Assays for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Soum D Lokeshwar; Jamil S Syed; Daniel Segal; Syed N Rahman; Preston C Sprenkle
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.075

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.