Literature DB >> 30142318

PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.

Izak Faiena1, Amirali Salmasi1, Neil Mendhiratta1, Daniela Markovic2, Preeti Ahuja3, William Hsu3, David A Elashoff2, Steven S Raman1,3, Robert E Reiter1,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Three Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging with PI-RADS™ (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) version 2 scoring is a common tool in prostate cancer diagnosis which informs the likelihood of a cancerous lesion. We investigated whether PI-RADS version 2 also predicts adverse pathology features mainly in patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 326 consecutive men with a preoperative template and/or magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy Gleason score of 6-7 from a prospectively maintained database of men who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy. The primary analysis was done in patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 to assess the primary outcome of adverse pathology features on univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The secondary outcome was biochemical recurrence-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Similar analysis was done in patients with a biopsy Gleason score of 6-7.
RESULTS: Of men with Gleason score 3 + 4 findings 27%, 15%, 36% and 23% showed a PI-RADS version 2 score of 0-2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. On univariate analysis PI-RADS version 2 category 5 predicted adverse pathology features vs categories 0-2 (OR 10.7, 95% CI 3.7-31, p ≤0.001). On multivariate analysis the PI-RADS version 2 category 5 was associated with adverse pathology when adjusting for preoperative magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy (OR 11.4, 95% CI 3.7-35, p ≤0.0001). In men with a targeted biopsy Gleason score of 3 + 4 prostate cancer PI-RADS version 2 category 5 was associated with adverse pathology (OR 14.7, 95% CI 1.5-146.9, p = 0.02). Of men with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 disease 92% and 58% with a PI-RADS version 2 score of 4 and 5, respectively, had 2-year biochemical recurrence-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS: A PI-RADS version 2 category 5 lesion in patients with a biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 lesion predicted adverse pathology features and biochemical recurrence-free survival. These findings suggest that preoperative 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging may serve as a prognostic marker of treatment outcomes independently of biopsy Gleason score or biopsy type.

Entities:  

Keywords:  image-guided biopsy; mortality; neoplasm grading; pathology; prostatic neoplasms; surgical

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30142318     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.08.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  3 in total

1.  Prognostic Features of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy Based on Multiparametric MRI and Immunohistochemistry Analysis of MRI-guided Biopsy Specimens.

Authors:  Stephanie A Harmon; William Gesztes; Denise Young; Sherif Mehralivand; Yolanda McKinney; Thomas Sanford; Jonathan Sackett; Jennifer Cullen; Inger L Rosner; Shiv Srivastava; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Albert Dobi; Isabell A Sesterhenn; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 29.146

2.  MRI Characteristics Accurately Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Cécile Manceau; Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Marine Lesourd; Christophe Almeras; Richard Aziza; Jean-Romain Gautier; Guillaume Loison; Ambroise Salin; Christophe Tollon; Michel Soulié; Bernard Malavaud; Mathieu Roumiguié; Guillaume Ploussard
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Selecting Patients with Favorable Risk, Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance-Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Have a Role?

Authors:  T Stonier; A L Tin; D D Sjoberg; G Jibara; A J Vickers; S Fine; J Eastham
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 7.450

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.