Literature DB >> 30141765

The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy and anterior column realignment classification.

Juan S Uribe1, Frank Schwab2, Gregory M Mundis3, David S Xu1, Jacob Januszewski4, Adam S Kanter5, David O Okonkwo5, Serena S Hu6, Deviren Vedat7, Robert Eastlack3, Pedro Berjano8, Praveen V Mummaneni9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVESpinal osteotomies and anterior column realignment (ACR) are procedures that allow preservation or restoration of spine lordosis. Variations of these techniques enable different degrees of segmental, regional, and global sagittal realignment. The authors propose a comprehensive anatomical classification system for ACR and its variants based on the level of technical complexity and invasiveness. This serves as a common language and platform to standardize clinical and radiographic outcomes for the utilization of ACR.METHODSThe proposed classification is based on 6 anatomical grades of ACR, including anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) release, with varying degrees of posterior column release or osteotomies. Additionally, a surgical approach (anterior, lateral, or posterior) was added. Reliability of the classification was evaluated by an analysis of 16 clinical cases, rated twice by 14 different spine surgeons, and calculation of Fleiss kappa coefficients.RESULTSThe 6 grades of ACR are as follows: grade A, ALL release with hyperlordotic cage, intact posterior elements; grade 1 (ACR + Schwab grade 1), additional resection of the inferior facet and joint capsule; grade 2 (ACR + Schwab grade 2), additional resection of both superior and inferior facets, interspinous ligament, ligamentum flavum, lamina, and spinous process; grade 3 (ACR + Schwab grade 3), additional adjacent-level 3-column osteotomy including pedicle subtraction osteotomy; grade 4 (ACR + Schwab grade 4), 2-level distal 3-column osteotomy including pedicle subtraction osteotomy and disc space resection; and grade 5 (ACR + Schwab grade 5), complete or partial removal of a vertebral body and both adjacent discs with or without posterior element resection. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were 97% and 98%, respectively, across the 14-reviewer cohort.CONCLUSIONSThe proposed anatomical realignment classification provides a consistent description of the various posterior and anterior column release/osteotomies. This reliability study confirmed that the classification is consistent and reproducible across a diverse group of spine surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACR = anterior column realignment; ALL = anterior longitudinal ligament; FEA = finite element analysis; LIF; LIF = lumbar interbody fusion; LL = lumbar lordosis; MIS = minimally invasive surgery; PCO = posterior column osteotomy; PI = pelvic incidence; SVA = sagittal vertical axis; XLIF; minimally invasive surgery; osteotomy; scoliosis; spine deformity; spine surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30141765     DOI: 10.3171/2018.4.SPINE171206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  9 in total

1.  Biomechanical in vitro comparison between anterior column realignment and pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe sagittal imbalance correction.

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Christian Liebsch; Tomaso Villa; Andrea Luca; Fabio Galbusera; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A new nomenclature system for the surgical treatment of cervical spine deformity, developing, and validation of SOF system.

Authors:  Jae Taek Hong; Heiko Koller; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Wen Yuan; Asdrubal Falavigna; Ho Jin Lee; Jong Beom Lee; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Jong-Hyeok Park; Il Sup Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Does the anterior column realignment technique influences the stresses on posterior instrumentation in sagittal imbalance correction? A biomechanical, finite-element analysis of L5-S1 ALIF and L3-4 lateral ACR.

Authors:  Matteo Panico; Marco Bertoli; Tomaso Maria Tobia Villa; Fabio Galbusera; Matteo Messori; Giovanni Andrea La Maida; Bernardo Misaggi; Enrico Gallazzi
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-08-23

4.  Multisegment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) combined with Ponte osteotomy in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) surgery: a minimum of five years' follow-up.

Authors:  Hao Qiu; Tong-Wei Chu; Xiao-Jian Niu; Ying Zhang; Si-Zhen Yang; Wu-Gui Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.479

5.  Anterior longitudinal ligament release from a posterior approach: an alternative to three-column osteotomy.

Authors:  Nathan Han; Nathan Pratt; M Farooq Usmani; Erik Hayman; Salazar Jones; Parker Johnsen; Alexandra E Thomson; Ivan Ye; Timothy Chryssikos; Ashish Sharma; Joshua Olexa; Daniel L Cavanaugh; Eugene Y Koh; Kendall Buraimoh; Steven Ludwig; Charles Sansur
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.721

6.  Adolescent-onset Local Kyphosis with Anterior Column Hypoplasia and Subluxation of the Facet Joints of the Lumbar Spine: A Case Report.

Authors:  Kohei Takahashi; Ko Hashimoto; Takahiro Onoki; Kyoichi Handa; Haruo Kanno; Toshimi Aizawa
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2022-01

Review 7.  State of the art advances in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Ibrahim Hussain; Kai-Ming Fu; Juan S Uribe; Dean Chou; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-08-06

8.  Minimally Invasive Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Release for Anterior Column Realignment.

Authors:  Jakub Godzik; Bernardo de Andrada Pereira; Courtney Hemphill; Corey T Walker; Joshua T Wewel; Jay D Turner; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

9.  Lateral interbody release for fused vertebrae via transpsoas approach in adult spinal deformity surgery: a preliminary report of radiographic and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Masanari Takami; Shunji Tsutsui; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Hiroshi Hashizume; Akihito Minamide; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Keiji Nagata; Ryo Taiji; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Andrew K Simpson; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.