BACKGROUND: Remote assessment of neurological disability in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) could improve access to clinical care and efficiency of clinical research. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a telemedicine-based MS disability examination that does not require an in-home examiner. METHODS: Adults with MS were recruited after a standardized in-person Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) evaluation, and within 1 week underwent a blinded televideo-enabled EDSS examination with a different clinician. EDSS and tele-EDSS scores were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 41 adults participated (mean (standard deviation (SD)) age: 47.0 years (11.6); median EDSS: 2 (range: 0-7)); 37 required no in-home assistance for the tele-EDSS evaluation (e.g. help positioning camera). Mean difference between EDSS and tele-EDSS was 0.34 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07-0.61). For 88% of evaluations, tele-EDSS and EDSS scores were within 1 point (similar to reported in-person inter-rater differences). Unweighted kappa for agreement within 0.5 point was 0.72. Correlation for individual functional systems (FS) ranged from modest (vision: 0.37) to high (bowel/bladder: 0.79). Overall correlation between EDSS and tele-EDSS was 0.89 (p < 0.0001); and 0.98 (p < 0.0001) at EDSS range: 4-7. CONCLUSION: In this proof of principle study, disability evaluation in mild to moderate MS is feasible using telemedicine without an aide at the patient's location.
BACKGROUND: Remote assessment of neurological disability in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) could improve access to clinical care and efficiency of clinical research. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a telemedicine-based MS disability examination that does not require an in-home examiner. METHODS: Adults with MS were recruited after a standardized in-person Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) evaluation, and within 1 week underwent a blinded televideo-enabled EDSS examination with a different clinician. EDSS and tele-EDSS scores were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 41 adults participated (mean (standard deviation (SD)) age: 47.0 years (11.6); median EDSS: 2 (range: 0-7)); 37 required no in-home assistance for the tele-EDSS evaluation (e.g. help positioning camera). Mean difference between EDSS and tele-EDSS was 0.34 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07-0.61). For 88% of evaluations, tele-EDSS and EDSS scores were within 1 point (similar to reported in-person inter-rater differences). Unweighted kappa for agreement within 0.5 point was 0.72. Correlation for individual functional systems (FS) ranged from modest (vision: 0.37) to high (bowel/bladder: 0.79). Overall correlation between EDSS and tele-EDSS was 0.89 (p < 0.0001); and 0.98 (p < 0.0001) at EDSS range: 4-7. CONCLUSION: In this proof of principle study, disability evaluation in mild to moderate MS is feasible using telemedicine without an aide at the patient's location.
Entities:
Keywords:
Telemedicine; digital health; disability; multiple sclerosis; remote trials
Authors: Andrew R Romeo; William M Rowles; Erica S Schleimer; Patrick Barba; Wan-Yu Hsu; Refujia Gomez; Adam Santaniello; Chao Zhao; Jennifer R Pearce; J B Jones; Bruce C Cree; Stephen L Hauser; Jeffrey M Gelfand; Walter F Stewart; Douglas S Goodin; Riley M Bove Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 5.855
Authors: Valerie J Block; Riley Bove; Chao Zhao; Priya Garcha; Jennifer Graves; Andrew R Romeo; Ari J Green; Diane D Allen; Jill A Hollenbach; Jeffrey E Olgin; Gregory M Marcus; Mark J Pletcher; Bruce A C Cree; Jeffrey M Gelfand Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-03-01
Authors: Ramana Appireddy; Sana Khan; Chad Leaver; Cally Martin; Albert Jin; Bryce A Durafourt; Stephen L Archer Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-10-07 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Parul Dayal; Celia H Chang; William S Benko; Aaron M Ulmer; Stephanie S Crossen; Brad H Pollock; Jeffrey S Hoch; Jamie L Kissee; Leslie Warner; James P Marcin Journal: Neurol Clin Pract Date: 2019-08
Authors: Rohit Bhatia; M V Padma Srivastava; Dheeraj Khurana; Lekha Pandit; Thomas Mathew; Salil Gupta; M Netravathi; Sruthi S Nair; Gagandeep Singh; Bhim S Singhal Journal: Ann Indian Acad Neurol Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 1.383