Literature DB >> 30141511

Dentists' perceptions of smart phone use in the clinical environment.

S Wright1, G Crofts1, T C Ucer1, S D Speechley1.   

Abstract

Objective: To determine the use of smart phones in clinical practice and to determine the perceived impact on patient safety. Study design: A closed questionnaire survey with an exploratory open question. Setting, materials and methods: A questionnaire was sent to a sample of 216 delegates that have attended courses provided by an education provider in the North West of England between 2015–2017.
Results: There was a response rate of 49.5% which represented 107 returned questionnaires. The mean year of qualification is 2008. Of the respondents,105 were general dental practitioners, and two were hospital based dentists. Of the respondents, 82.2% had their smart phone in surgery, and of these 88% had the smart phone on silent, with the respondents on average receiving three texts, four emails and one call each session. Of the respondents, 40.9% were not aware that they received a text, 53.4% an email, and 37.5% a telephone call. Whilst 50.1% responded, in some way, to a text, 46.6% to an email and 62.5% to a telephone call. Of the respondents, 61.7% think that having a phone in the surgery is a distraction. Of the respondents, 20.7% stated that smart phones should not be allowed in the surgery under any circumstance, whilst 24.1% stated that they should be allowed if on silent and out of view, and 16.4% allowed their use but not in front of patients. Conclusions: Eighty-eight percent of respondents had their smart phone with them in the surgery, with 61.7% reporting it to be a distraction from their clinical duties. It is our recommendation that each clinic has a protocol or policy that governs the use of smart phones focusing on patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30141511     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  32 in total

1.  Human error: models and management

Authors: 
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-06

2.  Reporting of medical errors: time for a reality check.

Authors:  L L Leape
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-09

3.  Error in medicine.

Authors:  L L Leape
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Distraction of clinicians by smartphones in hospitals: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Deborah L McBride
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Improving patient safety in a UK dental hospital: long-term use of clinical audit.

Authors:  M P Ashley; M N Pemberton; A Saksena; A Shaw; S Dickson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Evaluation of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residents' Operative Skills: Feasibility and Engagement Study Using SIMPL Software for a Mobile Phone.

Authors:  Leonard B Kaban; Alyssa Cappetta; Brian C George; Edward T Lahey; Jordan D Bohnen; Maria J Troulis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Medical errors - I : The problem.

Authors:  G Swaminath; R Raguram
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.759

8.  Rating recommendations for consumers about patient safety: sense, common sense, or nonsense?

Authors:  Saul N Weingart; Laurinda Morway; Daniela Brouillard; Angela Cleary; Terry K Eng; Mark G Saadeh; Andrew C Seger; David W Bates; Lucian L Leape
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2009-04

9.  Smartphones in the Operating Room: Distraction or Diagnostic Aid? A Case of Newly Diagnosed Wolff-Parkinson White in a Pediatric Patient Having Bronchoscopy Under General Anesthesia.

Authors:  Brandon Esenther; Riva Ko
Journal:  A A Case Rep       Date:  2015-08-01

10.  Developing patient safety in dentistry.

Authors:  M N Pemberton
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.