Pooja Bhati1, Jamal Ali Moiz1, Geetha R Menon2, M Ejaz Hussain3. 1. Centre for Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi, 110025, India. 2. National Institute of Medical Statistics, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, 110029, India. 3. Centre for Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi, 110025, India. ehusain@jmi.ac.in.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To systematically evaluate the literature on the effects of resistance training (RT) on cardiac autonomic control in healthy and diseased individuals. METHODS: Electronic databases Pubmed, PEDro, and Scopus were systematically searched from their inception up to June 2018. Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental trials, and cross-over controlled trials investigating the effect of RT (of at least 4 weeks duration) on cardiac autonomic control assessed either by linear or non-linear measures of heart rate variability (HRV), baroreflex sensitivity, or post-exercise heart rate recovery were included. Of the studies retrieved, 28 were included in the systematic review. Meta-analysis was performed on 21 studies of the total 28 studies. RESULTS: Quality and characteristic assessment revealed fair quality evidence. The majority of literature on healthy humans suggested no change in cardiac autonomic control following RT. Standardized mean differences (SMD) showed a significant effect of RT on root mean square of successive differences between adjacent inter-beat (R-R) intervals (RMSSD) [SMD 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-1.73; p = 0.01], ratio of low- to high-frequency power of HRV (LF/HF ratio; SMD -0.72, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.42; p < 0.00001), standard deviation of the instantaneous beat-to-beat variability (SD1; SMD 1.78, 95% CI 1.07-2.49, p < 0.00001), and sample entropy (SMD 1.17, 95% CI 0.36-1.97, p = 0.005) in diseased individuals. CONCLUSION: This rigorous systematic analysis revealed that RT has no or minimal effects on cardiac autonomic control of healthy individuals, but RT leads to improvement in cardiac autonomic control of diseased individuals.
PURPOSE: To systematically evaluate the literature on the effects of resistance training (RT) on cardiac autonomic control in healthy and diseased individuals. METHODS: Electronic databases Pubmed, PEDro, and Scopus were systematically searched from their inception up to June 2018. Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental trials, and cross-over controlled trials investigating the effect of RT (of at least 4 weeks duration) on cardiac autonomic control assessed either by linear or non-linear measures of heart rate variability (HRV), baroreflex sensitivity, or post-exercise heart rate recovery were included. Of the studies retrieved, 28 were included in the systematic review. Meta-analysis was performed on 21 studies of the total 28 studies. RESULTS: Quality and characteristic assessment revealed fair quality evidence. The majority of literature on healthy humans suggested no change in cardiac autonomic control following RT. Standardized mean differences (SMD) showed a significant effect of RT on root mean square of successive differences between adjacent inter-beat (R-R) intervals (RMSSD) [SMD 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-1.73; p = 0.01], ratio of low- to high-frequency power of HRV (LF/HF ratio; SMD -0.72, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.42; p < 0.00001), standard deviation of the instantaneous beat-to-beat variability (SD1; SMD 1.78, 95% CI 1.07-2.49, p < 0.00001), and sample entropy (SMD 1.17, 95% CI 0.36-1.97, p = 0.005) in diseased individuals. CONCLUSION: This rigorous systematic analysis revealed that RT has no or minimal effects on cardiac autonomic control of healthy individuals, but RT leads to improvement in cardiac autonomic control of diseased individuals.
Entities:
Keywords:
Autonomic control of heart; Exercise; Heart rate variability; Strength training
Authors: Kevin S Heffernan; Christopher A Fahs; Kevin K Shinsako; Sae Young Jae; Bo Fernhall Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2007-09-21 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Hélcio Kanegusuku; Carla Silva-Batista; Tiago Peçanha; Alice Nieuwboer; Natan D Silva; Luiz A Costa; Marco T de Mello; Maria E Piemonte; Carlos Ugrinowitsch; Cláudia L Forjaz Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: T Tuon; S S Valvassori; G C Dal Pont; C S Paganini; B G Pozzi; T F Luciano; P S Souza; J Quevedo; C T Souza; R A Pinho Journal: Brain Res Bull Date: 2014-09-28 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: G Tjeerdsma; B M Szabó; L M van Wijk; J Brouwer; R A Tio; H J Crijns; D J van Veldhuisen Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: S M Pikkujämsä; T H Mäkikallio; L B Sourander; I J Räihä; P Puukka; J Skyttä; C K Peng; A L Goldberger; H V Huikuri Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-07-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: F R Caruso; R Arena; S A Phillips; J C Bonjorno; R G Mendes; V M Arakelian; D Bassi; C Nogi; A Borghi-Silva Journal: Eur J Phys Rehabil Med Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 2.874
Authors: Rodica Pop-Busui; Gregory W Evans; Hertzel C Gerstein; Vivian Fonseca; Jerome L Fleg; Byron J Hoogwerf; Saul Genuth; Richard H Grimm; Marshall A Corson; Ronald Prineas Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Fabrício N Macedo; Thassio R R Mesquita; Vitor U Melo; Marcelo M Mota; Tharciano L T B Silva; Michael N Santana; Larissa R Oliveira; Robervan V Santos; Rodrigo Miguel Dos Santos; Sandra Lauton-Santos; Marcio R V Santos; Andre S Barreto; Valter J Santana-Filho Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Karynne Grutter Lopes; Paulo Farinatti; Daniel Alexandre Bottino; Maria DAS Graças Coelho DE Souza; Priscila Alves Maranhão; Eliete Bouskela; Roberto Alves Lourenço; Ricardo Brandão DE Oliveira Journal: Int J Exerc Sci Date: 2021-04-01
Authors: Wendell Arthur Lopes; Caroline Ferraz Simões; Jonathan Henrique Carvalho Nunes; Fernanda Errero Porto Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 4.435
Authors: Caique Figueiredo; Barbara M Antunes; Thaís R Giacon; Luiz C M Vanderlei; Eduardo Z Campos; Fernando P Peres; Nicolas W Clark; Valéria L G Panissa; Fábio S Lira Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Mukesh Kumar Sinha; G Arun Maiya; Ana Maria Moga; Shivashankar K N; Ravi Shankar N; Vaishali K Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Christoph Schneider; Thimo Wiewelhove; Christian Raeder; Andrew A Flatt; Olaf Hoos; Laura Hottenrott; Oliver Schumbera; Michael Kellmann; Tim Meyer; Mark Pfeiffer; Alexander Ferrauti Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Bruno Bavaresco Gambassi; Fabiano de Jesus Furtado Almeida; Ana Eugênia Araújo Furtado Almeida; Daniela Alves Flexa Ribeiro; Rômulo Sérgio Araújo Gomes; Luiz Filipe Costa Chaves; Thiago Matheus da Silva Sousa; Vinicius José da Silva Nina Journal: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2019-06-01
Authors: Sigitas Kamandulis; Antanas Juodsnukis; Jurate Stanislovaitiene; Ilona Judita Zuoziene; Andrius Bogdelis; Mantas Mickevicius; Nerijus Eimantas; Audrius Snieckus; Bjørn Harald Olstad; Tomas Venckunas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-22 Impact factor: 3.390