| Literature DB >> 30140978 |
Purva Kulkarni1, Rutger A Wilschut2, Koen J F Verhoeven2, Wim H van der Putten2,3, Paolina Garbeva2.
Abstract
MAINEntities:
Keywords: Ambient imaging; Comparative metabolomics; Mass spectrometry imaging; Metabolic profiling; Plant root; Range expansion
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30140978 PMCID: PMC6244666 DOI: 10.1007/s00425-018-2989-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Planta ISSN: 0032-0935 Impact factor: 4.116
Fig. 1Data preparation and processing steps applied post-acquisition. a Optical image for the intact roots of a single replicate of C. jacea with labeled ablation spots. b Ablation spots present on the root selected (in green) for further analysis. c Averaged spectra acquired from all the 50 selected spots per replicate. d Data pre-processing and peak-detection steps applied to all spectra for a sample
Fig. 2Metabolic profiling and comparison of LAESI-MS spectra from native and range-expanding plant species. Each representative mass spectra is generated by averaging and pre-processing the signals acquired in positive ion mode, arising from the 50 ablation spots present on the imaged root sample for each replicate. The averaged pre-processed mass spectra are displayed for the three replicates of native species (C. jacea and G. molle) and the three replicates for range-expanding plant species (C. stoebe L. and G. pyrenaicum)
Fig. 3Dendrogram and Principal component analysis (PCA) score plot for the selected native and range-expanding species. a Species clustering represented as a dendrogram (distance measure used is Euclidean and clustering algorithm is ward). Each node in the dendrogram corresponds to a single replicate belonging either to the range-expanding or to the congeneric native plant species. b The PCA score plot displays the total explained variance of > 70% for component 1 and component 2. Ovals represent 95% confidence intervals. Each oval represents a sample group and each point represents a single sample
Overview of the number of metabolites detected in each sample replicate after pre-processing and peak detection of the acquired LAESI-MSI datasets
| Replicate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 283 | 332 | 143 | 129 |
| 2 | 204 | 301 | 151 | 127 |
| 3 | 286 | 286 | 131 | 122 |
Fig. 4Venn diagram showing overlapping and unique metabolites associated with native and range-expanding plant species. a Venn diagram for C. jacea (CJ) and C. stoebe (CS). b Venn diagram for G. molle (GM) and G. pyrenaicum (GP). To construct the Venn diagram, a single mass feature was considered even if it was present in only one replicate for a specific sample species
Fig. 5Volcano plots and box plots to demonstrate metabolite concentration differences observed in native and range-expanding plant species. a Volcano plot for C. jacea (CJ) vs. C. stoebe (CS). b Volcano plot for G. molle (GM) vs. G. pyrenaicum (GP). Each point in the volcano plot represents one metabolite. Significant metabolites were calculated with a fold change (FC) threshold of 2 on the x axis and a t tests threshold of 0.1 on the y axis. The red and the green dots indicate statistically significant metabolites, and the gray dots below the FC threshold line represent statistically non-significant metabolites. The vertical FC threshold lines indicate an increase or decrease in concentration of metabolites. Negative log2 (FC) values indicated in red represent lower concentrations in native than in range-expanding species; positive values indicated in green represent higher concentrations of metabolites in native than in range-expanding species. The box plots for the detected metabolites and their corresponding ion intensity maps below each volcano plot display the localization of the selected metabolites that are significantly different in the respective native and range-expanding species. The signal intensity in the ion intensity maps is represented in rainbow color scale, in a mass window of ± 1 mDa