Literature DB >> 30140561

RELATIVE JOINT CONTRIBUTION TO JOINT HYPERMOBILITY IN RUGBY PLAYERS, NETBALLERS AND DANCERS: THE NEED FOR CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF LUMBAR FLEXION.

Ross Armstrong1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Generalized joint hypermobility is commonly measured using the Beighton and Horan Joint Mobility Index which provides a Beighton score of 0-9. Generally, scores of > 4 are classified as hypermobile however joint hypermobility classification lacks consistency across the literature.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare the relative contribution of five joints to joint hypermobility scores in female and male rugby players, female netball players, female dancers and male and female age matched controls. STUDY
DESIGN: Individual cohort study.
METHODS: Joint hypermobility was assessed in 286 subjects using the Beighton and Horan Joint Mobility Index. Subjects were assigned a Beighton score of 0-9. These scores were then categorized using three different joint hypermobility classification systems and results were analyzed using a Pearsons Chi Square (x2) to report the relative contributions of each joint to hypermobility scores.
RESULTS: Significant differences existed for group and gender analysis at the left and right 5th metacarpophalangeal joints, left and right thumb, left and right elbow and lumbar spine (p < 0.001). Lumbar flexion demonstrated significant x2 values and large effect sizes for all groups. This effect size was reduced to a moderate effect size when male against female analysis was performed and joint hypermobility was greater in females in comparison to males. The knee joint demonstrated the lowest hypermobility across all populations and ranged from 3% in male rugby players to 24% in female dancers. Seven hypermobile knees existed in males and 53 in females. Female dancers had the highest prevalence (93%) of hypermobile lumbar flexion and all female groups had a higher prevalence of hypermobile lumbar flexion than males. The removal of lumbar flexion from the total Beighton score had no effect on joint hypermobility prevalence in males in contrast to females where changes were demonstrated.
CONCLUSION: Joint hypermobility classification of female dancers should consider the high prevalence of hypermobility of lumbar flexion in interpretation. The consideration of separate classification systems for males and females, and between athletes of different sports and dancers may aid future understanding. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: 2b.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beighton score; female dancers; hypermobility; lumbar flexion

Year:  2018        PMID: 30140561      PMCID: PMC6088118     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  26 in total

1.  Hypermobility and sports injuries in junior netball players.

Authors:  R Smith; A K Damodaran; S Swaminathan; R Campbell; L Barnsley
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  A framework for the classification of joint hypermobility and related conditions.

Authors:  Marco Castori; Brad Tinkle; Howard Levy; Rodney Grahame; Fransiska Malfait; Alan Hakim
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.908

3.  Prevalence, injury rate and, symptom frequency in generalized joint laxity and joint hypermobility syndrome in a "healthy" college population.

Authors:  Leslie N Russek; Deanna M Errico
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  Orthopaedic management of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes.

Authors:  William B Ericson; Roger Wolman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.908

5.  Articular mobility in an African population.

Authors:  P Beighton; L Solomon; C L Soskolne
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  A hypermobility study in ballet dancers.

Authors:  P Klemp; J E Stevens; S Isaacs
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  The influence of joint hypermobility on functional movement control in an elite netball population: A preliminary cohort study.

Authors:  Kessie Soper; Jane V Simmonds; Hanadi Kaz Kaz; Nelly Ninis
Journal:  Phys Ther Sport       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Lack of consensus on tests and criteria for generalized joint hypermobility, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: hypermobile type and joint hypermobility syndrome.

Authors:  Lars Remvig; Lise Flycht; Karl B Christensen; Birgit Juul-Kristensen
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Inter-examiner reproducibility of tests and criteria for generalized joint hypermobility and benign joint hypermobility syndrome.

Authors:  B Juul-Kristensen; H Røgind; D V Jensen; L Remvig
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 7.580

10.  Motor competence and physical activity in 8-year-old school children with generalized joint hypermobility.

Authors:  Birgit Juul-Kristensen; Jens Halkjaer Kristensen; Britt Frausing; Dorte Vendelboe Jensen; Henrik Røgind; Lars Remvig
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  1 in total

1.  Noncontact Knee Ligament Injury Prevention Screening in Netball: A Clinical Commentary with Clinical Practice Suggestions for Community-Level Players.

Authors:  Nicholas C Clark
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-06-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.