Literature DB >> 30140542

Selecting an Appropriate Cuffed Endotracheal Tube Using Ultrasound of the Cricoid in a Child with Down Syndrome.

Kenji Kayashima1, Ryo Yamasaki1.   

Abstract

A 7-year-old girl (height, 94 cm; weight, 15.1 kg) with Down syndrome was scheduled for right patellar dislocation repositioning. The ultrasonographically measured internal transverse width of the cricoid before intubation was 7.8 mm. Attempted insertion of a cuffed Mallinckrodt® endotracheal tube (ETT) (internal diameter, 5.0 mm; deflated cuff portion, 8.4 mm diameter) failed. In contrast, the insertion of a cuffed Microcuff® ETT (5.0 mm ID; deflated cuff portion, 7.3 mm diameter) was successful. Thicker folds in the deflated cuff of the Mallinckrodt ETT could have hindered passage through the vocal cord, including the cricoid region. It is becoming standard to use the ultrasonographically measured internal width of the cricoid when choosing cuffed paediatric ETTs, and this approach may be suitable for patients with Down syndrome as well. In these children, approximately 20% of uncuffed ETTs inserted were one or two sizes smaller in diameter than those predicted for the same age. We may choose the ETT size in reference to an ultrasonographically obtained internal transverse width of the cricoid, stated outer diameter (OD) by the producer, and the actual OD depending on the cuff bulk instead of a tube size calculation in patients with growth retardation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Down syndrome; Endotracheal tube size; cuffed endotracheal tube; paediatric

Year:  2018        PMID: 30140542      PMCID: PMC6101723          DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2018.87847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim        ISSN: 2149-276X


  10 in total

1.  Prediction of pediatric endotracheal tube size by ultrasonography.

Authors:  Masayuki Shibasaki; Yasufumi Nakajima; Sachiyo Ishii; Fumihiro Shimizu; Nobuaki Shime; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Ultrasound measurement of subglottic diameter and an empirical formula for proper endotracheal tube fitting in children.

Authors:  E J Kim; S Y Kim; W O Kim; H Kim; H K Kil
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.105

3.  Corrigendum to "Endotracheal tubes and the cricoid: Is there a good fit?" [Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. (2016) 8-11].

Authors:  Mahmood Rafiq; Tariq M Wani; Melissa Moore-Clingenpeel; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 1.675

4.  Difficulty Inserting Cuffed Endotracheal Tubes in a Child: A Case Report.

Authors:  Keiko Imai; Taku Doi; Kenji Kayashima
Journal:  A A Case Rep       Date:  2017-03-15

5.  Ultrasonographic Measurement of Subglottic Diameter for Paediatric Cuffed Endotracheal Tube Size Selection: Feasibility Report.

Authors:  Demet Altun; Mukadder Orhan Sungur; Achmet Ali; Emre Sertaç Bingül; Tülay Özkan Seyhan; Emre Çamcı
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  Down syndrome: analysis of airway size and a guide for appropriate intubation.

Authors:  S R Shott
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Appropriate placement of intubation depth marks in a new cuffed paediatric tracheal tube.

Authors:  M Weiss; A C Gerber; A Dullenkopf
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Pediatric laryngeal dimensions: an age-based analysis.

Authors:  Priti G Dalal; David Murray; Anna H Messner; Angela Feng; John McAllister; David Molter
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Anaesthetic considerations in Down's syndrome: experience with 100 patients and a review of the literature.

Authors:  M Kobel; R E Creighton; D J Steward
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1982-11

10.  Developmental changes of laryngeal dimensions in unparalyzed, sedated children.

Authors:  Ronald S Litman; Eric E Weissend; Dean Shibata; Per-Lennart Westesson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.892

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.