Literature DB >> 30139880

Functional Ex Vivo Assay Reveals Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Breast Cancer Beyond BRCA Gene Defects.

Titia G Meijer1, Nicole S Verkaik1, Anieta M Sieuwerts2, Job van Riet3,4, Kishan A T Naipal1, Carolien H M van Deurzen5, Michael A den Bakker6, Hein F B M Sleddens5, Hendrikus-Jan Dubbink5, T Dorine den Toom5, Winand N M Dinjens5, Esther Lips7, Petra M Nederlof7, Marcel Smid2, Harmen J G van de Werken3,4, Roland Kanaar1, John W M Martens2, Agnes Jager2, Dik C van Gent8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tumors of germline BRCA1/2 mutated carriers show homologous recombination (HR) deficiency (HRD), resulting in impaired DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair and high sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. Although this therapy is expected to be effective beyond germline BRCA1/2 mutated carriers, a robust validated test to detect HRD tumors is lacking. In this study, we therefore evaluated a functional HR assay exploiting the formation of RAD51 foci in proliferating cells after ex vivo irradiation of fresh breast cancer tissue: the recombination REpair CAPacity (RECAP) test. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Fresh samples of 170 primary breast cancer were analyzed using the RECAP test. The molecular explanation for the HRD phenotype was investigated by exploring BRCA deficiencies, mutational signatures, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), and microsatellite instability (MSI).
RESULTS: RECAP was completed successfully in 148 of 170 samples (87%). Twenty-four tumors showed HRD (16%), whereas six tumors were HR intermediate (HRi; 4%). HRD was explained by BRCA deficiencies (mutations, promoter hypermethylation, deletions) in 16 cases, whereas seven HRD tumors were non-BRCA related. HRD tumors showed an increased incidence of high TIL counts (P = 0.023) compared with HR proficient (HRP) tumors and MSI was more frequently observed in the HRD group (2/20, 10%) than expected in breast cancer (1%; P = 0.017).
CONCLUSIONS: RECAP is a robust functional HR assay detecting both BRCA1/2-deficient and BRCA1/2-proficient HRD tumors. Functional assessment of HR in a pseudo-diagnostic setting is achievable and produces robust and interpretable results. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30139880     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  16 in total

1.  Clinical Outcome of Leiomyosarcomas With Somatic Alteration in Homologous Recombination Pathway Genes.

Authors:  Evan Rosenbaum; Philip Jonsson; Kenneth Seier; Li-Xuan Qin; Ping Chi; Mark Dickson; Mrinal Gounder; Ciara Kelly; Mary L Keohan; Benjamin Nacev; Mark T A Donoghue; Sarah Chiang; Samuel Singer; Marc Ladanyi; Cristina R Antonescu; Martee L Hensley; Sujana Movva; Sandra P D'Angelo; William D Tap
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-11-06

Review 2.  Genomics-guided pre-clinical development of cancer therapies.

Authors:  Hayley E Francies; Ultan McDermott; Mathew J Garnett
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2020-05-22

3.  GAS6/AXL Inhibition Enhances Ovarian Cancer Sensitivity to Chemotherapy and PARP Inhibition through Increased DNA Damage and Enhanced Replication Stress.

Authors:  Mary M Mullen; Elena Lomonosova; Michael D Toboni; Alyssa Oplt; Emily Cybulla; Barbara Blachut; Peinan Zhao; Hollie Noia; Daniel Wilke; Erinn B Rankin; Lindsay M Kuroki; Andrea R Hagemann; Ian S Hagemann; Carolyn K McCourt; Premal H Thaker; David G Mutch; Matthew A Powell; Nima Mosammaparast; Alessandro Vindigni; Katherine C Fuh
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 6.333

Review 4.  Identifying patients eligible for PARP inhibitor treatment: from NGS-based tests to 3D functional assays.

Authors:  Pierre-Marie Morice; Elodie Coquan; Louis-Bastien Weiswald; Bernard Lambert; Dominique Vaur; Laurent Poulain
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Role of the DNA damage response in prostate cancer formation, progression and treatment.

Authors:  Wenhao Zhang; Dik C van Gent; Luca Incrocci; Wytske M van Weerden; Julie Nonnekens
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.554

6.  DNA methylation-based classifier and gene expression signatures detect BRCAness in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Maxim Barenboim; Michal Kovac; Baptiste Ameline; David T W Jones; Olaf Witt; Stefan Bielack; Stefan Burdach; Daniel Baumhoer; Michaela Nathrath
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 7.  The role of patient-derived ovarian cancer organoids in the study of PARP inhibitors sensitivity and resistance: from genomic analysis to functional testing.

Authors:  Mengyu Tao; Xia Wu
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10-26

8.  Identifying Transcripts with Tandem Duplications from RNA-Sequencing Data to Predict BRCA1-Type Primary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shuoying Qu; John W M Martens; Antoinette Hollestelle; Marcel Smid
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Prevention of DNA Replication Stress by CHK1 Leads to Chemoresistance Despite a DNA Repair Defect in Homologous Recombination in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Felix Meyer; Saskia Becker; Sandra Classen; Ann Christin Parplys; Wael Yassin Mansour; Britta Riepen; Sara Timm; Claudia Ruebe; Maria Jasin; Harriet Wikman; Cordula Petersen; Kai Rothkamm; Kerstin Borgmann
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Regulation and pharmacological targeting of RAD51 in cancer.

Authors:  McKenzie K Grundy; Ronald J Buckanovich; Kara A Bernstein
Journal:  NAR Cancer       Date:  2020-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.