Literature DB >> 30139669

Mobile applications providing guidance about decreased fetal movement: Review and content analysis.

Lisa M Daly1, Frances M Boyle2, Kristen Gibbons2, Han Le3, Janine Roberts4, Vicki Flenady2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maternal perception of decreased fetal movement has clinical significance as a predictor of pregnancies at risk of adverse outcomes, including stillbirth. Increasingly, women are using mobile applications ("apps") to access information during the antenatal period. Little is known about how apps intended for use during pregnancy guide women to address fetal movement concerns.
OBJECTIVE: To explore information about decreased fetal movement provided through mobile apps intended for use during pregnancy.
METHODS: A systematic review framework was applied to the search, screening, and assessment of mobile apps. A sample of apps were downloaded in December 2016 that met inclusion criteria for accessibility, reach, relevance and quality. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers in January 2017. A quantitative and qualitative approach was taken to analyse data and present results.
FINDINGS: All 24 apps in the sample mentioned decreased fetal movement, but few explicitly link decreased fetal movement to stillbirth or other specific adverse outcomes. There is substantial variability in guidance for fetal movement monitoring. One-quarter of apps recommend consumption of food or drink to stimulate fetal movement, two-thirds of apps recommend "kick counting", and one-third offer a kick "counter".
CONCLUSION: This review is the first to assess information about decreased fetal movement available in mobile apps intended for download by pregnant women. Across the sample, this review identifies a lack of evidence-based clinical advice to guide women experiencing decreased fetal movement. As an antenatal education tool used by millions of women, accurate content about fetal movement is essential.
Copyright © 2018 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fetal movement; Mobile applications; Pregnancy; Stillbirth; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30139669     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  5 in total

Review 1.  Safety concerns with consumer-facing mobile health applications and their consequences: a scoping review.

Authors:  Saba Akbar; Enrico Coiera; Farah Magrabi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Investigation of Digital Technology Use in the Transition to Parenting: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Lorie Donelle; Jodi Hall; Bradley Hiebert; Kimberley Jackson; Ewelina Stoyanovich; Jessica LaChance; Danica Facca
Journal:  JMIR Pediatr Parent       Date:  2021-02-17

3.  Passive Fetal Movement Recognition Approaches Using Hyperparameter Tuned LightGBM Model and Bayesian Optimization.

Authors:  Sensong Liang; Jiansheng Peng; Yong Xu; Hemin Ye
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-09

4.  Assessing fetal movements in pregnancy: A qualitative evidence synthesis of women's views, perspectives and experiences.

Authors:  Valerie Smith; Kathryn Muldoon; Vivienne Brady; Hannah Delaney
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  The effect of formal fetal movement counting on maternal psychological outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nazia AlAmri; Valerie Smith
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2021-02-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.