Elad Anter1, Andre G Kleber2, Markus Rottmann2, Eran Leshem2, Michael Barkagan2, Cory M Tschabrunn2, Fernando M Contreras-Valdes2, Alfred E Buxton2. 1. Harvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: eanter@bidmc.harvard.edu. 2. Harvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In this study, the scientific objective was to characterize the electrophysiological substrate of the ventricular tachycardia (VT) isthmus during sinus rhythm. BACKGROUND: The authors have recently described the electrophysiological characteristics of the VT isthmus using a novel in vivo high-resolution mapping technology. METHODS: Sixteen swine with healed infarction were studied using high-resolution mapping technology (Rhythmia, Boston Scientific, Cambridge, Massachusetts) in a closed-chest model. The left ventricle was mapped during sinus rhythm and analyzed for activation, conduction velocity, electrogram shape, and amplitude. Twenty-four VTs allowed detailed mapping of the common-channel "isthmus," including the "critical zone." This was defined as the zone of maximal conduction velocity slowing in the circuit, often occurring at entrance and exit from the isthmus caused by rapid angular change in activation vectors. RESULTS: The VT isthmus corresponded to sites displaying steep activation gradient (SAG) during sinus rhythm with conduction velocity slowing of 58.5 ± 22.4% (positive predictive value [PPV] 60%). The VT critical zone displayed SAG with greater conduction velocity slowing of 68.6 ± 18.2% (PPV 70%). Critical-zone sites were consistently localized in areas with bipolar voltage ≤0.55 mV, whereas isthmus sites were localized in areas with variable voltage amplitude (1.05 ± 0.80 mV [0.03 to 2.88 mV]). Importantly, critical zones served as common-site "anchors" for multiple VT configurations and cycle lengths. Isthmus and critical-zone sites occupied only 18.0 ± 7.0% of the low-voltage area (≤1.50 mV). Isolated late potentials were present in both isthmus and nonisthmus sites, including dead-end pathways (PPV 36%; 95% confidence interval: 34.2% to 39.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The VT critical zone corresponds to a location characterized by SAG and very low voltage amplitude during sinus rhythm. Thus, it allows identification of a re-entry anchor with high sensitivity and specificity. By contrast, voltage and electrogram characteristics during sinus rhythm have limited specificity for identifying the VT isthmus.
OBJECTIVES: In this study, the scientific objective was to characterize the electrophysiological substrate of the ventricular tachycardia (VT) isthmus during sinus rhythm. BACKGROUND: The authors have recently described the electrophysiological characteristics of the VT isthmus using a novel in vivo high-resolution mapping technology. METHODS: Sixteen swine with healed infarction were studied using high-resolution mapping technology (Rhythmia, Boston Scientific, Cambridge, Massachusetts) in a closed-chest model. The left ventricle was mapped during sinus rhythm and analyzed for activation, conduction velocity, electrogram shape, and amplitude. Twenty-four VTs allowed detailed mapping of the common-channel "isthmus," including the "critical zone." This was defined as the zone of maximal conduction velocity slowing in the circuit, often occurring at entrance and exit from the isthmus caused by rapid angular change in activation vectors. RESULTS: The VT isthmus corresponded to sites displaying steep activation gradient (SAG) during sinus rhythm with conduction velocity slowing of 58.5 ± 22.4% (positive predictive value [PPV] 60%). The VT critical zone displayed SAG with greater conduction velocity slowing of 68.6 ± 18.2% (PPV 70%). Critical-zone sites were consistently localized in areas with bipolar voltage ≤0.55 mV, whereas isthmus sites were localized in areas with variable voltage amplitude (1.05 ± 0.80 mV [0.03 to 2.88 mV]). Importantly, critical zones served as common-site "anchors" for multiple VT configurations and cycle lengths. Isthmus and critical-zone sites occupied only 18.0 ± 7.0% of the low-voltage area (≤1.50 mV). Isolated late potentials were present in both isthmus and nonisthmus sites, including dead-end pathways (PPV 36%; 95% confidence interval: 34.2% to 39.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The VT critical zone corresponds to a location characterized by SAG and very low voltage amplitude during sinus rhythm. Thus, it allows identification of a re-entry anchor with high sensitivity and specificity. By contrast, voltage and electrogram characteristics during sinus rhythm have limited specificity for identifying the VT isthmus.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Markus Rottmann; Andre G Kleber; Michael Barkagan; Jakub Sroubek; Eran Leshem; Ayelet Shapira-Daniels; Alfred E Buxton; Elad Anter Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2019-10-10
Authors: Elad Anter; Petr Neuzil; Vivek Y Reddy; Jan Petru; Kyoung-Min Park; Jakub Sroubek; Eran Leshem; Peter J Zimetbaum; Alfred E Buxton; Andre G Kleber; Changyu Shen; Andrew L Wit Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2020-05-06
Authors: Fernando O Campos; Michele Orini; Peter Taggart; Ben Hanson; Pier D Lambiase; Bradley Porter; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi; Jaswinder Gill; Martin J Bishop Journal: Comput Biol Med Date: 2019-03-23 Impact factor: 4.589
Authors: Neil T Srinivasan; Jason Garcia; Richard J Schilling; Syed Ahsan; Girish G Babu; Richard Ang; Mehul B Dhinoja; Ross J Hunter; Martin Lowe; Anthony W Chow; Pier D Lambiase Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2020-09-16