Literature DB >> 30139266

Comparison of Electrophysiological Properties and Gene Expression between Human Chondrocytes and Chondroprogenitors Derived from Normal and Osteoarthritic Cartilage.

Upasana Kachroo1, Abel Livingston2, Elizabeth Vinod1,3, Solomon Sathishkumar1, P R J V C Boopalan2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Bone-marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and chondrocytes are currently used for cell-based therapy in cartilage repair. Chondroprogenitors (CPs), resident cells of articular cartilage, demonstrate likeness to stem cells. Reports suggest that chondrocytes phenotype is altered in culture, thus making differentiation between the two cell populations difficult. Our objectives were to electrophysiologically assess chondrocytes and CPs, compare their mRNA expression with that of ionic channels already reported in MSCs, and to observe the effect of time in culture and osteoarthritic damage on cells. DESIGN AND
RESULTS: Chondrocytes and CPs at passages 0 (p0) and 5 (p5) derived from normal and osteoarthritic (OA) knee joints were used. Ionic currents were recorded by subjecting cells to depolarizing voltage pulses, and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used for studying ion channel expression. Our results demonstrated that both chondrocytes and CPs showed the presence of similar currents belonging to voltage-gated potassium channel subfamily, with RT-PCR confirming high mRNA expression of Maxi K, HKv1.1, HKv1.4, HKv4.2, and hEAG1 channels. Our finding also suggested that CPs were comparatively more sensitive to increased time in culture and inflammatory processes as observed in OA, as was evidenced by the significant decrease in mean current density (p0 normal CP: 183.171 ± 50.80 pA/pF; p5 normal CP: 50.225 ± 17.63 pA/pF; P = 0.0280) and significant increase in cellular size (p0 normal CP: 21.564 ± 2.98 pF; p0 OA CP: 37.939 ± 3.55 pF; P = 0.0057).
CONCLUSION: Both cell types appear to be optimal candidates for cell-based therapy although initial seeding density, cell source (normal vs. OA), and time in culture are matters of concern, prior to cell-type selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RT-PCR; chondrocytes; chondroprogenitors; electrophysiology; osteoarthritis

Year:  2018        PMID: 30139266      PMCID: PMC7298598          DOI: 10.1177/1947603518796140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cartilage        ISSN: 1947-6035            Impact factor:   4.634


  20 in total

Review 1.  Chondrocyte and mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies for cartilage repair in osteoarthritis and related orthopaedic conditions.

Authors:  Ali Mobasheri; Gauthaman Kalamegam; Giuseppe Musumeci; Mark E Batt
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Voltage-dependent calcium channels in chondrocytes: roles in health and disease.

Authors:  Csaba Matta; Róza Zákány; Ali Mobasheri
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Independent regulation of collagen types by chondrocytes during the loss of differentiated function in culture.

Authors:  P D Benya; S R Padilla; M E Nimni
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Reserve or Resident Progenitors in Cartilage? Comparative Analysis of Chondrocytes versus Chondroprogenitors and Their Role in Cartilage Repair.

Authors:  Elizabeth Vinod; P R J V C Boopalan; Solomon Sathishkumar
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Matrix-induced autologous mesenchymal stem cell implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in the treatment of chondral defects of the knee: a 2-year randomized study.

Authors:  Isık Akgun; Mehmet C Unlu; Ozan A Erdal; Tahir Ogut; Murat Erturk; Ercument Ovali; Fatih Kantarci; Gurkan Caliskan; Yamac Akgun
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  Advanced cell therapies for articular cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Catarina Madeira; Aruna Santhagunam; João B Salgueiro; Joaquim M S Cabral
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 7.  Cartilage wound healing. An overview.

Authors:  F H Silver; A I Glasgold
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 8.  Activation and dedifferentiation of chondrocytes: implications in cartilage injury and repair.

Authors:  Gundula Schulze-Tanzil
Journal:  Ann Anat       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function.

Authors:  Alice J Sophia Fox; Asheesh Bedi; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.843

10.  Identification and clonal characterisation of a progenitor cell sub-population in normal human articular cartilage.

Authors:  Rebecca Williams; Ilyas M Khan; Kirsty Richardson; Larissa Nelson; Helen E McCarthy; Talal Analbelsi; Sim K Singhrao; Gary P Dowthwaite; Rhiannon E Jones; Duncan M Baird; Holly Lewis; Selwyn Roberts; Hannah M Shaw; Jayesh Dudhia; John Fairclough; Timothy Briggs; Charles W Archer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pondering the Potential of Hyaline Cartilage-Derived Chondroprogenitors for Tissue Regeneration: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Vinod; Roshni Parameswaran; Boopalan Ramasamy; Upasana Kachroo
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Mechanosensory and mechanotransductive processes mediated by ion channels in articular chondrocytes: Potential therapeutic targets for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Kun Zhang; Lifu Wang; Zhongcheng Liu; Bin Geng; Yuanjun Teng; Xuening Liu; Qiong Yi; Dechen Yu; Xiangyi Chen; Dacheng Zhao; Yayi Xia
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.581

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.