Literature DB >> 30138682

Changing Trends in Reconstruction of Complex Anterior Urethral Strictures: From Skin Flap to Perineal Urethrostomy.

Joceline S Fuchs1, Nabeel Shakir1, Maxim J McKibben1, Jeremy M Scott1, Boyd Viers1, Travis Pagliara1, Allen F Morey2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate procedural trends and outcomes for reconstruction of complex strictures at our tertiary center over the last decade.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed complex urethral reconstruction comparing 3 techniques: (1) buccal mucosal graft (BMG), (2) penile skin flap, or (3) perineal urethrostomy (PU) at our center (2007-2017) with ≥6 months follow-up. Strictures amenable to anastomotic repair were excluded. Success was defined as no need for further operative management.
RESULTS: Among 1129 strictures cases, 403 complex strictures were identified for analysis (median length 4.5 cm). Median age was 53.2 years (standard deviation ± 14.9). Reconstruction was most commonly performed using BMG (61.3%), followed by penile skin flap (21.6%) and PU (19.1%). PU use has increased steadily over the past decade, rising from 4.3% of case volume in 2008 to 38.7% in 2017 (P = .01). Over time, the proportion of reconstruction using BMG has remained stable, while penile skin flaps are now less commonly utilized. Over a median follow-up of 50.7 months, 16.9% (68/403) patients failed at a median of 13.9 months. Success rates were higher following PU (94.8%) compared to BMG and skin flaps (78.5% and 78.2%, respectively) (P = .003) despite PU patients being older (median age 62.6 years), having longer strictures (median 5.0 cm) and more commonly having lichen sclerosus (LS) (22.1%).
CONCLUSION: Over a decade of a urethral reconstructive practice, PU has increasingly become preferred for older patients with long strictures and adverse etiology. BMG urethroplasty rates remain stable, while penile skin flap use is decreasing. Success rates of PU for these complex strictures are markedly higher than those of grafts and flaps.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30138682     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current treatment of lichen sclerosus and stricture.

Authors:  Amanda S J Chung; Oscar A Suarez
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Versatile algorithmic midline approach to perineal urethrostomy for complex urethral strictures.

Authors:  Maxim J McKibben; Alexander T Rozanski; Joceline S Fuchs; Varun Sundaram; Allen F Morey
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on male urethral stricture.

Authors:  Keith F Rourke; Blayne Welk; Ron Kodama; Greg Bailly; Tim Davies; Nancy Santesso; Philippe D Violette
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.052

4.  Perineal urethrostomy with combined buccal mucosal graft and skin flap after complete loss of anterior urethra.

Authors:  Naoki Akagi; Akihiro Kanematsu; Shingo Yamamoto
Journal:  IJU Case Rep       Date:  2021-01-03

5.  Evaluation of the efficacy of perineal urethrostomy for patients with anterior urethral stricture: insights from surgical and patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Masayuki Shinchi; Akio Horiguch; Kenichiro Ojima; Kazuki Kawamura; Yusuke Hirano; Eiji Takahashi; Fumihiro Kimura; Ryuichi Azuma; Keiichi Ito
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.226

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.