| Literature DB >> 30138335 |
Hironori Tanabe1, Yoichi Aota2, Yasuteru Yamaguchi1, Kanichiro Kaneko1, Sousuke Imai1, Masaki Takahashi3, Masataka Taguri4, Tomoyuki Saito1.
Abstract
Recent studies have shown an association between <span class="Disease">osteopenia and <span class="Disease">adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and implied that osteopenia plays a causative role in AIS development. This study aimed to determine if minodronate (MIN) treatment could prevent curve progression by increasing bone mass in a thoracic restraint (TR) mouse model, which develops causes the development of thoracic scoliosis similar to human AIS. A total of 100 young female C57BL6J mice were divided into four groups: (1) control with vehicle (CON/VEH; n = 20), (2) control with MIN (CON/MIN; n = 20), (3) TR with vehicle (TR/VEH; n = 30), or (4) TR with MIN (TR/MIN; n = 30). MIN (0.01 mg/kg/week) and vehicle were administered intraperitoneally to their respective groups. TR was performed at age 4 weeks, and the mice were sacrificed at age 9 weeks. Body weights, spine radiographs, femoral bone mineral density (BMD), serum bone marker levels, and histomorphometry of the cancellous bone of the thoracic vertebrae were analyzed. TR significantly reduced weight gain in the TR/VEH group relative to the CON/VEH group. TR also induced osteoporosis with accelerated bone resorption, as indicated by decreases in femoral BMDs and thoracic cancellous bone volume and increases in serum bone resorption marker levels and histomorphometric resorption parameters in the TR/VEH group. MIN partially improved body weight gain and improved poor bone structure relative to the TR/VEH group by suppressing high bone resorption in the TR/MIN mice. MIN significantly reduced the curve magnitudes, as indicated by a 43% lower curve magnitude in the TR/MIN mice than in the TR/VEH mice (17.9 ± 8.9° vs. 31.5 ± 13.1°; p< 0.001). The administration of MIN increased bone mass and reduced the severity of scoliosis in the TR mice. MIN was suggested as a possible inhibitor of scoliosis development.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30138335 PMCID: PMC6107151 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Thoracic restraint (TR) impairs the body growth of mice, and minodronate treatment inhibits TR-induced skeletal deterioration in mice.
(A) Representative photographs of the CON/VEH, CON/MIN, TR/VEH, and TR/MIN mice at 9 weeks of age. TR treated mice appear to be emaciated. Scale Bar, 1 cm. (B) Total body weights of the CON/VEH, CON/MIN, TR/VEH, and TR/MIN mice at age of 4–9 weeks. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 20 for CON/VEH and CON/MIN, and n = 30 for TR/VEH and TR/MIN; *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01, and ***p< 0.001, significantly different from the TR/VEH group as reference (Dunnett’s test)).
Fig 2Posteroanterior radiographs of the whole spine.
Cobb angle measurement of the curvatures. A straight vertebral column observed in the CON/VEH and CON/MIN mice. Scoliosis with a single thoracic curve seen in the TR/VEH and TR/MIN mice. The TR/MIN mice show lower magnitudes of spinal deformity than the TR/VEH mice.
Fig 3Femoral BMD in TR mice and effect of minodronate.
(A) Total femoral BMD in each group at age of 9 weeks. Values shown are mean ± SD. (n = 6 for each group; ***p< 0.001, significantly different from the TR/VEH group as reference (Dunnett’s test).) (B) Effect of TR and minodronate treatment on markers of bone turnover in each group. Values shown are mean ± SD. (n = 6 for CON/VEH, CON/MIN and TR/VEH, and n = 9 for TR/MIN; *p< 0.05 and **p< 0.01, significantly different from the TR/VEH group as reference (Dunnett’s test). N.S. not significant).
Fig 4Bone histomorphometry in TR mice and effect of minodronate.
(A) Villanueva staining of undecalcified sagittal sections of the thoracic vertebral column of the CON/VEH, CON/MIN, TR/VEH, and TR/MIN mice. Bar = 1000μm. NP, nucleus pulposus; SC, spinal cord; SP, spinal process; VB, vertebral bodies. (B) Histological analysis of sagittal sections of the seventh thoracic vertebral column in each group. The trabecular bone volume in the TR/VEH group is lower than that in the CON/MIN group. The decrease was sufficiently inhibited by minodronate treatment. Trabecular bone, indicated by the white squares, is highlighted in Fig 4C. Scale Bar = 200μm. (C) Fluorescent images of representative sections of the vertebral trabecular surface demonstrating double tetracycline and calcein fluorochrome labeling. The enlarged figures show the increased distance between labeled bone surfaces in the TR mice compared with the untreated control mice. Minodronate preserves TR-induced increases in bone formation. Scale Bar = 10μm.
Effect of thoracic restraint and minodronate treatment on static and dynamic quantitative histomorphomety of thoracic spine.
| Controls | TR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle | MIN | Vehicle | MIN | ||
| 20.0 ± 3.1 | 26.3 ± 2.7 | 11.5 ± 3.5 a | 24.5 ± 3.0 b | ||
| 38.6 ± 4.5 | 40.2 ± 2.0 | 26.0 ± 2.6 | 36.2 ± 2.0 b | ||
| 5.2 ± 0.6 | 6.5 ± 0.7 | 4.4 ± 0.9 a | 6.8 ± 0.7 b | ||
| 156.2± 24.5 | 113.8 ± 14.7 | 210.5 ± 47.4 a | 112.9 ± 15.9 b | ||
| 25.2 ± 6.1 | 13.5 ± 2.9 | 28.0 ± 5.5 | 17.3 ± 3.6 b | ||
| 19.4 ± 6.2 | 7.4 ± 2.2 | 20.7 ± 5.1 | 10.5 ± 2.7 b | ||
| 2.44 ± 0.13 | 1.99 ± 0.19 | 2.73 ± 0.17 a | 1.99 ± 0.17 b | ||
| 29.2 ± 4.7 | 4.4 ± 2.2 | 34.4 ± 4.2 | 7.6 ± 2.9 b | ||
| 3.2 ± 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 4.4 ± 0.5 a | 1.2 ± 0.2 b | ||
| 8.8 ± 1.0 | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 12.0 ± 1.7 a | 2.8 ± 0.4 b | ||
| 26.3 ± 3.4 | 12.8 ± 3.8 | 30.5 ± 5.9 | 17.3± 2.8 b | ||
| 1.82± 0.15 | 1.24 ± 0.22 | 2.04 ± 0.26 | 1.05 ± 0.22 b | ||
| 174.2 ± 28.4 | 59.4 ± 25.0 | 230.0 ± 60.7 | 68.2 ± 22.3 b | ||
BV/TV = bone volume fraction; Tb.Th = trabecular thickness; Tb.N = trabecular number; Tb.Sp = trabecular separation; OS/BS = osteoid surface per bone surface; Ob.S/BS = osteoblast surface per bone surface; O.Th = osteoid thickness; ES/BS = eroded surface per bone surface; N.Oc/BS = osteoclast number per bone surface; Oc.S/BS = osteoclast surface per bone surface; MS/BS = mineralizing surface per bone surface; MAR = mineral apposition rate; BFR/BS = bone formation rate per bone surface; TR = thoracic restraint; MIN = minodronate
Values are mean ± SD. (n = 6 for each group; a p < 0.05 TR versus control within vehicle condition. b p < 0.05 MIN versus Vehicle within TR condition.)
Correlations between Cobb angle and contributing factors in thoracic restraint mice.
| R | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| BV/TV | -0.82 | 0.046 | |
| Tb.Th | -0.80 | 0.061 | |
| OS/BS | 0.12 | 0.832 | |
| Ob.S/BS | 0.03 | 0.964 | |
| ES/BS | -0.15 | 0.783 | |
| Oc.S/BS | 0.91 | 0.011 | |
| MS/BS | 0.48 | 0.331 | |
| MAR | 0.15 | 0.783 | |
| BFR/BS | 0.35 | 0.504 | |
| total femoral BMD | -0.72 | 0.115 | |
BV/TV = bone volume fraction; Tb.Th = trabecular thickness; OS/BS = osteoid surface per bone surface; Ob. S/BS = osteoblast surface per bone surface; ES/BS = eroded surface per bone surface; Oc.S/BS = osteoclast surface per bone surface; MS/BS = mineralizing surface per bone surface; MAR = mineral apposition rate; BFR/BS = bone formation rate per bone surface; BMD = bone mineral density
n = 6
*p < 0.05