Kate B Carey1, Jennifer L Walsh2, Jennifer E Merrill3, Sarah A Lust4, Allecia E Reid5, Lori A J Scott-Sheldon6, Seth C Kalichman7, Michael P Carey6. 1. Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies. 2. Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Medical College of Wisconsin. 3. Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health. 4. Program in Psychology, Maryville University. 5. Department of Psychology, Colby College. 6. Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital. 7. Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:Brief motivational interventions (BMIs) reduce drinking in the short term, but these initial effects often decay. We tested the hypothesis that theory-based e-mail boosters would promote maintenance of change after a BMI. METHOD:Participants were students (N = 568; 72% male) who violated campus alcohol policy and were mandated to participate in an alcohol-risk-reduction program. Participants provided baseline data, received a BMI, and then completed a 1-month post-BMI survey. Next, they were randomized to receive 12 booster e-mails that contained either (a) alcohol norms or (b) structurally equivalent general health information (control). Alcohol consumption and alcohol-related consequences were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 5, 8, and 12 months. RESULTS: As expected, we observed significant reductions in both consumption and consequences after the BMI (ps < .01), and groups were equivalent at baseline and at 1-month post-BMI, prior to randomization (ps > .05). Latent growth curve models revealed no condition effects on changes in the latent consumption variable from 1- to 12-month follow-ups (b = .01, SE = .01, p > .05). Unexpectedly, a main effect of the condition emerged for self-reported consequences (b = .03, SE = .01, p = .01); we observed more consequences after boosters containing alcohol norms than general health information. Outcomes were not moderated by sex, consumption at baseline or 1 month, or e-mail exposure, and there was no mediation by descriptive norms, injunctive norms, or peer communication. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to predictions, e-mail boosters with corrective norms content did not improve outcomes after a BMI. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Brief motivational interventions (BMIs) reduce drinking in the short term, but these initial effects often decay. We tested the hypothesis that theory-based e-mail boosters would promote maintenance of change after a BMI. METHOD:Participants were students (N = 568; 72% male) who violated campus alcohol policy and were mandated to participate in an alcohol-risk-reduction program. Participants provided baseline data, received a BMI, and then completed a 1-month post-BMI survey. Next, they were randomized to receive 12 booster e-mails that contained either (a) alcohol norms or (b) structurally equivalent general health information (control). Alcohol consumption and alcohol-related consequences were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 5, 8, and 12 months. RESULTS: As expected, we observed significant reductions in both consumption and consequences after the BMI (ps < .01), and groups were equivalent at baseline and at 1-month post-BMI, prior to randomization (ps > .05). Latent growth curve models revealed no condition effects on changes in the latent consumption variable from 1- to 12-month follow-ups (b = .01, SE = .01, p > .05). Unexpectedly, a main effect of the condition emerged for self-reported consequences (b = .03, SE = .01, p = .01); we observed more consequences after boosters containing alcohol norms than general health information. Outcomes were not moderated by sex, consumption at baseline or 1 month, or e-mail exposure, and there was no mediation by descriptive norms, injunctive norms, or peer communication. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to predictions, e-mail boosters with corrective norms content did not improve outcomes after a BMI. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: David Huh; Eun-Young Mun; Mary E Larimer; Helene R White; Anne E Ray; Isaac C Rhew; Su-Young Kim; Yang Jiao; David C Atkins Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Kate B Carey; Jennifer E Merrill; Jennifer L Walsh; Sarah A Lust; Seth C Kalichman; Michael P Carey Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Samuel F Acuff; Kathryn E Soltis; Ashley A Dennhardt; Brian Borsari; Matthew P Martens; Katie Witkiewitz; James G Murphy Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2019-08-26
Authors: Andreas Staudt; Jennis Freyer-Adam; Till Ittermann; Christian Meyer; Gallus Bischof; Ulrich John; Sophie Baumann Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2022-09-24 Impact factor: 4.612