Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for fractional integrals via Green's function.

In the article, we establish the left Riemann-Liouville fractional Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities and the generalized Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities by using Green's function and Jensen's inequality, and present several new Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for a class of convex as well as monotone functions.

Introduction

Convexity plays an important role in all the fields of pure and applied mathematics [1-12]. Many remarkable inequalities have been obtained in the literature by using convexity [13-22]. Among the inequalities, the most extensively and intensively attractive inequality in the last decades is the well-known Hermite–Hadamard inequality. This interesting result was obtained by Hermite and Hadamard independently, and it provides an equivalence with the convexity property. This inequality reads as follows: if the function is convex on , then If ψ is a concave function, then the inequalities in (1.1) will hold in reverse directions. The Hermite–Hadamard inequality gives an upper as well as lower estimations for the integral mean of any convex function defined on a closed and bounded interval which involves the endpoints and midpoint of the domain of the function. Also (1.1) provides the necessary and sufficient condition for the function to be convex. There are several applications of this inequality in the geometry of Banach spaces and nonlinear analysis [23, 24]. Some peculiar convex functions can be used in (1.1) to obtain classical inequalities for means. For some comprehensive surveys on various generalizations and developments of (1.1), we recommend [25]. Due to the great importance of this inequality, in the recent years many remarkable varieties of generalizations, refinements, extensions and different versions of Hermite–Hadamard inequality for different classes of convexity, such as preinvex, s-convex, harmonic convex, -convex, superquadratic, and co-ordinate convex functions, have been studied in the literature. Also there have been a large number of research papers published on this subject, for interested readers we recommend to read the papers [26-37] and some of the references therein.

The following definitions for the left and right side Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals are well known in the literature.

Let with and . Then the left and right Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals and of order are defined by and respectively, where is the gamma function defined by .

In [38], Sarikaya et al. established the Hermite–Hadamard type inequality for fractional integral as follows.

Theorem 1.1

Let be a positive function with , , and . If ψ is convex on , then one has

Remark 1.2

In Theorem 1.1, it is not necessary to suppose that ψ is a positive function and are positive real numbers. From the definition of left and right Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals, we clearly see that and can be any real numbers such that .

The main purpose of this paper is to give a new method to derive the left Riemann–Liouville fractional Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities as given in [39]. In this method we use Green’s function and obtain identities for the difference of the left Riemann–Liouville fractional Hermite–Hadamard inequality, and then we prove that these identities are non-negative. As a consequence, these inequalities provide the generalized Hermite–Hadamard inequality. Also, by using these identities for the class of convex, concave, and monotone functions, we obtain new Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities.

Main results

Let . Then the following four new Green’s functions are defined by Mehmood et al. in [40]:

In [40], the authors established the following Lemma 2.1, which will be used to establish our main results.

Lemma 2.1

(see [40, Lemma 1])

Let and be the Green’s function defined by (2.1). Then if .

Theorem 2.2

Let be a convex function. Then the double inequality holds for any .

Proof

Substituting in (2.5), we get

Now, multiplying both sides of (2.5) by and integrating, we get Subtracting (2.8) from (2.7), we obtain Clearly Also, since Therefore, if , then from (2.10) and (2.11) we have

Now, let Then which shows that f is decreasing and , hence for all , i.e., If , then making use of (2.10) and (2.11) we get

Since ψ is convex, therefore, 0 and so by using (2.12) and (2.13) in (2.9), we deduce which is the first inequality of (2.6).

Next, we prove the second inequality of (2.6). Let in (2.5), then we have

Adding on both sides and then dividing by , we get

Subtracting (2.8) from (2.14), we obtain

Using the Green’s function and (2.10), we obtain for all .

Now, using the convexity of ψ and (2.16) in (2.15), we get which is the second inequality of (2.6). □

Next, we present new Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for the class of monotone and convex functions.

Theorem 2.3

Let and . Then the following statements are true:

If is an increasing function, then

If is a decreasing function, then

If is a convex function, then

(i) It follows from (2.15) that

Since and is an increasing function, therefore we have which is inequality (2.17).

Part (ii) can be proved in a similar way, we omit the details.

For part (iii), making use of (2.18) and the fact that every convex function ψ defined on the interval is bounded above by , we get  □

Remark 2.4

Let . Then Theorem 2.3 leads to

Theorem 2.5

Let and . Then the following statements are true:

If is an increasing function, then

If is a decreasing function, then

If is a convex function, then

(i) It follows from (2.9) that

Taking the absolute function and using the triangular inequality, we get

Part (ii) can be proved by using the same procedure.

Next, we prove part (iii). We clearly see that

Since every convex function ψ defined on an interval is bounded above by . Therefore, we have which is our required inequality. □

Remark 2.6

Let . Then Theorem 2.5 leads to

Theorem 2.7

Let and be a convex function. Then the inequality holds for any .

It follows from (2.19) that

Let and . Then

Taking absolute on both sides and using the convexity of , we get which completes the proof. □

Remark 2.8

In Theorem 2.7, if we take , then we obtain

Theorem 2.9

Let and be a convex function. Then the inequality holds for any .

From (2.15), we have

Let and . Then we obtain

Taking absolute on both sides and using the convexity of , we get which is our required inequality. □

Remark 2.10

In Theorem 2.9, if we take , then we obtain

Theorem 2.11

Let and be a concave function. Then for any .

It follows from (2.20) that

Taking absolute on both sides and using Jensen’s integral inequality, we get  □

Remark 2.12

In Theorem 2.11, if we take , then we obtain

Theorem 2.13

Assume that and is a concave function. Then, for any , we have the inequality

From (2.21) one has

Taking absolute on both sides and using Jensen’s integral inequality, we get  □

Remark 2.14

Let . Then Theorem 2.13 leads to

Remark 2.15

We can also get the same results as in this article if we use the Green’s function given by (2.2) instead of the Green’s function given by (2.1). But we can only get previously known results if we use the idea of the article and the Green’s function given by (2.3) or given by (2.4). This is the reason why we only deal with the Green’s function in the article. As exercises, interested readers can use other three Green’s functions to give their corresponding results.

Results and discussion

In the article, we use Green’s function method to establish the left Riemann–Liouville fractional Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities. The given idea by using the Green’s function (2.1) or any other new Green’s function may be furthered to research the Hermite–Hadamard inequality for fractional integrals as presented in [38] and to research the Hermite–Hadamard inequality for pre-invex, s-convex, co-ordinate convex functions etc.

Conclusion

In the article, we establish the left Riemann–Liouville fractional Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities and the generalized Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities by using Green’s function and Jensen’s inequality. The given idea and results are novel and interesting, they may stimulate further research in the theory of fractional integrals and generalized convex functions.