Samantha G Farris1,2,3, Elizabeth R Aston4, Teresa M Leyro1, Lily A Brown5, Michael J Zvolensky6,7. 1. Department of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI. 3. Centers for Behavioral and Prevention Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI. 4. Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, School of Public Health at Brown University, Providence, RI. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 6. Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX. 7. Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Distress intolerance (DI), one's perceived or behavioral incapacity to withstand distress, is implicated in psychopathology and smoking. This study evaluated the effect of DI on smoking reinforcement in the context of a carbon dioxide (CO2) biological challenge. METHODS:Adult daily smokers (n = 90; 48.9% female) were randomized to receive a single inhalation/breath of 35% CO2-enriched air (n = 45) or compressed room air (n = 45). Perceived DI was assessed before the challenge. Smoking reinforcement was examined via average post-challenge puff volume across puffs and at the puff-to-puff level. RESULTS: Higher DI was associated with an increased average puff volume (b = -4.7, p = .031). CO2 produced decreased average puff volume compared with room air (b = -7.7, p = .018). There was a DI* condition interaction (ƒ2 = 0.02), such that CO2 decreased average puff volume compared with room air in smokers with higher DI (b = -13.9, t = -3.06, p = .003), but not lower DI. At the puff-to-puff level, there was a significant interaction between DI, condition, and cubic time (b = 0.0003, p =. 037). Specifically, room air produced large initial puff volumes that decreased from puff to puff over the cigarette for high- and low-DI smokers. CO2 produced persistent flat volumes from puff to puff over the cigarette for higher DI smokers, whereas CO2 produced puff volumes like that of room air in lower DI smokers. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest DI heightens smoking reinforcement generally, and in the context of intense cardiorespiratory distress, is associated with stable and persistent smoking. DI is a promising therapeutic target that, if addressed through psychological intervention, may improve cessation outcomes by decreasing smoking reinforcement. IMPLICATIONS: This study contributes to our understanding of the relationship between DI and smoking reinforcement, via examining these processes in response to acute cardiorespiratory distress. Specifically, we found that smokers who are less tolerant of distress, as opposed to those who are more tolerant, evince a decrease in average puff volume, and consistently low puff-to-puff volume, in response to a biological stressor. These findings suggest that smokers high in DI alter smoking behavior following acute cardiorespiratory distress, perhaps to reduce overstimulation, yet also persist in smoking in a manner that suggests an inability to achieve satiation.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Distress intolerance (DI), one's perceived or behavioral incapacity to withstand distress, is implicated in psychopathology and smoking. This study evaluated the effect of DI on smoking reinforcement in the context of a carbon dioxide (CO2) biological challenge. METHODS: Adult daily smokers (n = 90; 48.9% female) were randomized to receive a single inhalation/breath of 35% CO2-enriched air (n = 45) or compressed room air (n = 45). Perceived DI was assessed before the challenge. Smoking reinforcement was examined via average post-challenge puff volume across puffs and at the puff-to-puff level. RESULTS: Higher DI was associated with an increased average puff volume (b = -4.7, p = .031). CO2 produced decreased average puff volume compared with room air (b = -7.7, p = .018). There was a DI* condition interaction (ƒ2 = 0.02), such that CO2 decreased average puff volume compared with room air in smokers with higher DI (b = -13.9, t = -3.06, p = .003), but not lower DI. At the puff-to-puff level, there was a significant interaction between DI, condition, and cubic time (b = 0.0003, p =. 037). Specifically, room air produced large initial puff volumes that decreased from puff to puff over the cigarette for high- and low-DI smokers. CO2 produced persistent flat volumes from puff to puff over the cigarette for higher DI smokers, whereas CO2 produced puff volumes like that of room air in lower DI smokers. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest DI heightens smoking reinforcement generally, and in the context of intense cardiorespiratory distress, is associated with stable and persistent smoking. DI is a promising therapeutic target that, if addressed through psychological intervention, may improve cessation outcomes by decreasing smoking reinforcement. IMPLICATIONS: This study contributes to our understanding of the relationship between DI and smoking reinforcement, via examining these processes in response to acute cardiorespiratory distress. Specifically, we found that smokers who are less tolerant of distress, as opposed to those who are more tolerant, evince a decrease in average puff volume, and consistently low puff-to-puff volume, in response to a biological stressor. These findings suggest that smokers high in DI alter smoking behavior following acute cardiorespiratory distress, perhaps to reduce overstimulation, yet also persist in smoking in a manner that suggests an inability to achieve satiation.
Authors: Marina A Bornovalova; Kim L Gratz; Stacey B Daughters; Elizabeth D Hunt; C W Lejuez Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Angela R Volz; Paul A Dennis; Michelle F Dennis; Patrick S Calhoun; Sarah M Wilson; Jean C Beckham Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Michael J Zvolensky; Lorra Garey; Nicolas P Allan; Samantha G Farris; Amanda M Raines; Jasper A J Smits; Brooke Y Kauffman; Kara Manning; Norman B Schmidt Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2018-05
Authors: Christopher Cambron; Aaron K Haslam; Brian R W Baucom; Cho Lam; Christine Vinci; Paul Cinciripini; Liang Li; David W Wetter Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Allison M Borges; Teresa M Leyro; Rachel L Rosen; Michael J Zvolensky; Samantha G Farris Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 4.492