Literature DB >> 30136605

Evaluation of Intrapelvic Pressure When Using Small-Sized Ureteral Access Sheaths of ≤10/12F in an Ex Vivo Porcine Kidney Model.

Takashi Yoshida1,2, Takaaki Inoue2, Taiji Abe3, Tadashi Matsuda2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Although several different ureteral access sheaths (UASs) of ≤10/12F are commercially available, their advantages and disadvantages during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the difference in intrapelvic pressure (IPP) between different UASs of ≤10/12F with several irrigation pressure settings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five different commercially available UASs (9.5/11.5F Flexor®, 10/12F ReTrace®, 10/12F Bi-Flex®, 10/12F Proxis®, and 10/12F UroPass®) with the thinnest ureteroscope (UFR-P6®) were tested with eight different irrigation pressures (40-180 mbar) in an ex vivo porcine kidney model. Diameters of each part of the UASs were measured using a digimatic caliper, and IPP and irrigation outflow (IOF) rates were evaluated at the time of reaching the plateau of maximum IPP.
RESULTS: The 9.5/11.5F Flexor had the narrowest inner diameter and the 10/12F UroPass had the widest outer diameter among UASs (both p < 0.05). The 10/12F UroPass and 10/12F Bi-Flex provided an IPP below 40 cm H2O at all irrigation pressures, whereas the 9.5/11.5F Flexor, 10/12F Proxis, and 10/12F ReTrace provided such an IPP at irrigation pressures of <60, 120, and 120 mbar, respectively. Similar to IPP, the 10/12F UroPass and 10/12F Bi-Flex had a significantly higher IOF rate than that of the other UASs at all irrigation pressures (both p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The 9.5/11.5F Flexor is the thinnest UAS and may provide excessive IPP during RIRS. Among 10/12F UASs, 10/12F UroPass and 10/12F Bi-Flex can provide a safe IPP and good IOF at any irrigation pressure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  model; intrapelvic pressure; retrograde intrarenal surgery; ureteroscope

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30136605     DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  2 in total

Review 1.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Takaaki Inoue; Shinsuke Okada; Shuzo Hamamoto; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03

2.  Intra-renal pressure and temperature during ureteroscopy: Does it matter?

Authors:  Antonio Corrêa Lopes; Vinícius Dall'Aqua; Raphael V Carrera; Wilson R Molina; Sidney Glina
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.