María L Sánchez-Ferrer1, María T Prieto-Sánchez1, Luis C Moya-Jiménez2, Evdochia Adoamnei3,4, Jaime Mendiola3,4, Alberto M Torres-Cantero3,4. 1. Departmentof Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Virgen de la Arrixaca" University Clinical Hospital and Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Murcia, Spain. 3. Division of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Murcia School of Medicine, Espinardo, Murcia, Spain. 4. Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain.
Abstract
AIMS: Anogenital distance (AGD) has been proposed as a marker of the prenatal hormonal milieu and potential environmental insults. The measures of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Questionnaire (POP-Q) system is being widely used in the evaluation of the perineum in women with POP pathologies. Genital hiatus (GH) and perineal body (PB) lengths have been related to both prolapse incidence and recurrence and for pessary treatment failure. The use of AGD in female human studies is now emerging and its comparability with other anthropometric measurements could be relevant. The aim of the study was to compare AGD and POP-Q system in adult females. METHODS: The study included 155 pregnant women in the first stage of labor. Perineal measurements were performed on women in the lithotomy position: AGD from the anus to the clitoris (AGDAC ); AGD from the anus to the fourchette (AGDAF ); GH from the external urethral meatus to the posterior midline hymen, and length of the PB from the posterior midline hymen to the mid-anal opening. Coefficients of variations (CV) were calculated. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman graphs were used to compare both set of measurements. RESULTS: CV were below 15% for AGDAC and GH + PB, though higher for AGDAF and PB (20% and 17%, respectively). ICCs for each pair of measurements were above 80%, (excellent agreement between methods). Concordance between measurements was confirmed by Bland-Altman graphs. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable measurements were obtained using AGDs and POP-Q system. Further studies are needed to explore clinical and epidemiological implications of these findings.
AIMS: Anogenital distance (AGD) has been proposed as a marker of the prenatal hormonal milieu and potential environmental insults. The measures of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Questionnaire (POP-Q) system is being widely used in the evaluation of the perineum in women with POP pathologies. Genital hiatus (GH) and perineal body (PB) lengths have been related to both prolapse incidence and recurrence and for pessary treatment failure. The use of AGD in female human studies is now emerging and its comparability with other anthropometric measurements could be relevant. The aim of the study was to compare AGD and POP-Q system in adult females. METHODS: The study included 155 pregnant women in the first stage of labor. Perineal measurements were performed on women in the lithotomy position: AGD from the anus to the clitoris (AGDAC ); AGD from the anus to the fourchette (AGDAF ); GH from the external urethral meatus to the posterior midline hymen, and length of the PB from the posterior midline hymen to the mid-anal opening. Coefficients of variations (CV) were calculated. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman graphs were used to compare both set of measurements. RESULTS: CV were below 15% for AGDAC and GH + PB, though higher for AGDAF and PB (20% and 17%, respectively). ICCs for each pair of measurements were above 80%, (excellent agreement between methods). Concordance between measurements was confirmed by Bland-Altman graphs. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable measurements were obtained using AGDs and POP-Q system. Further studies are needed to explore clinical and epidemiological implications of these findings.