Literature DB >> 30136073

Dominance effects of ion transport and ion transport regulator genes on the final weight and backfat thickness of Landrace pigs by dominance deviation analysis.

Young-Sup Lee1, Donghyun Shin2, Ki-Duk Song3.   

Abstract

Although there have been plenty of dominance deviation analysis, few studies have dealt with multiple phenotypes. Because researchers focused on multiple phenotypes (final weight and backfat thickness) of Landrace pigs, the classification of the genes was possible. With genome-wide association studies (GWASs), we analyzed the additive and dominance effects of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The classification of the pig genes into four categories (overdominance in final weight, overdominance in backfat thickness and overdominance in final weight, underdominance in backfat thickness, etc.) can enable us not only to analyze each phenotype's dominant effects, but also to illustrate the gene ontology (GO) analysis with different aspects. We aimed to determine the additive and dominant effect in backfat thickness and final weight and performed GO analysis. Using additive model and dominance deviation analysis in GWASs, Landrace pigs' overdominant and underdominant SNP effects in final weight and backfat thickness were surveyed. Then through GO analysis, we investigated the genes that were classified in the GWASs. The major GO terms of the underdominant effects in final weight and overdominant effects in backfat thickness were ion transport with the SLC8A3, KCNJ16, P2RX7 and TRPC3 genes. Interestingly, the major GO terms in the underdominant effects in the final weight and the underdominant effects in the backfat thickness were the regulation of ion transport with the STAC, GCK, TRPC6, UBASH3B, CAMK2D, CACNG4 and SCN4B genes. These results demonstrate that ion transport and ion transport regulation genes have distinct dominant effects. Through GWASs using the mode of linear additive model and dominance deviation, overdominant effects and underdominant effects in backfat thickness was contrary to each other in GO terms (ion transport and ion transport regulation, respectively). Additionally, because ion transport and ion transport regulation genes are associative with adipose tissue accumulation, we could infer that these two groups of genes had to do with unique fat accumulation mechanisms in Landrace pigs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Backfat thickness; Gillespie model; Landrace pigs; Overdominance; Underdominance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30136073     DOI: 10.1007/s13258-018-0728-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Genomics        ISSN: 1976-9571            Impact factor:   1.839


  16 in total

1.  Ion transport and morphological changes of mitochondria in brown adipocytes of warm- and cold-acclimatized obese Zucker rats.

Authors:  Y L Tsai; S Sasaki; I Nakagaki; J Tsujita; S Hori; K Hori
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  2001-08

2.  Renal phenotype in mice lacking the Kir5.1 (Kcnj16) K+ channel subunit contrasts with that observed in SeSAME/EAST syndrome.

Authors:  Marc Paulais; May Bloch-Faure; Nicolas Picard; Thibaut Jacques; Suresh Krishna Ramakrishnan; Mathilde Keck; Fabien Sohet; Dominique Eladari; Pascal Houillier; Stéphane Lourdel; Jacques Teulon; Stephen J Tucker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The evolution of overdominance: natural selection and heterozygote advantage.

Authors:  P A PARSONS; W F BODMER
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1961-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Animal model estimation of genetic parameters and response to selection for litter size and weight, growth, and backfat in closed seedstock populations of large white and Landrace swine.

Authors:  J B Ferraz; R K Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Pedigree analysis and exclusion of alpha-tocopherol transfer protein (TTPA) as a candidate gene for neuroaxonal dystrophy in the American Quarter Horse.

Authors:  C J Finno; T Famula; M Aleman; R J Higgins; J E Madigan; D L Bannasch
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  A whole genomic scan to detect selection signatures between Berkshire and Korean native pig breeds.

Authors:  Zewdu Edea; Kwan-Suk Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-06

7.  Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identify a QTL close to PRKAG3 affecting meat pH and colour in crossbred commercial pigs.

Authors:  Chunyan Zhang; Zhiquan Wang; Heather Bruce; Robert Alan Kemp; Patrick Charagu; Younes Miar; Tianfu Yang; Graham Plastow
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  Interaction of genetic markers associated with serum alkaline phosphatase levels in the Japanese population.

Authors:  Masatoshi Masuda; Kayo Okuda; Daisuke D Ikeda; Haretsugu Hishigaki; Tsutomu Fujiwara
Journal:  Hum Genome Var       Date:  2015-07-02

9.  Effects of covariates and interactions on a genome-wide association analysis of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Rector Arya; Elizabeth Hare; Inmaculada Del Rincon; Christopher P Jenkinson; Ravindranath Duggirala; Laura Almasy; Agustin Escalante
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2009-12-15

Review 10.  The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: a review.

Authors:  Arthur Korte; Ashley Farlow
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 4.993

View more
  8 in total

1.  Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Patterns of Muscle and Tail-Fat in DairyMeade Sheep and Mongolian Sheep.

Authors:  Rongsong Luo; Xuelei Dai; Li Zhang; Guangpeng Li; Zhong Zheng
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Discovery of significant porcine SNPs for swine breed identification by a hybrid of information gain, genetic algorithm, and frequency feature selection technique.

Authors:  Kitsuchart Pasupa; Wanthanee Rathasamuth; Sissades Tongsima
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Additive and heterozygous (dis)advantage GWAS models reveal candidate genes involved in the genotypic variation of maize hybrids to Azospirillum brasilense.

Authors:  Miriam Suzane Vidotti; Danilo Hottis Lyra; Júlia Silva Morosini; Ítalo Stefanine Correia Granato; Maria Carolina Quecine; João Lúcio de Azevedo; Roberto Fritsche-Neto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Long Intergenic Non-Coding RNAs Contributed to Intramuscular Fat Content Differences between Yorkshire and Wei Pigs.

Authors:  Qianqian Li; Ziying Huang; Wenjuan Zhao; Mengxun Li; Changchun Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Expression analysis and single-nucleotide polymorphisms of SYNDIG1L and UNC13C genes associated with thoracic vertebral numbers in sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Ying-Jie Zhong; Yang Yang; Xiang-Yu Wang; Ran Di; Ming-Xing Chu; Qiu-Yue Liu
Journal:  Arch Anim Breed       Date:  2021-04-23

6.  Heterozygosity and homozygosity regions affect reproductive success and the loss of reproduction: A case study with litter traits in pigs.

Authors:  Zitao Chen; Zhenyang Zhang; Zhen Wang; Zhe Zhang; Qishan Wang; Yuchun Pan
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.155

7.  Multiple association analysis of loci and candidate genes that regulate body size at three growth stages in Simmental beef cattle.

Authors:  Bingxing An; Lei Xu; Jiangwei Xia; Xiaoqiao Wang; Jian Miao; Tianpeng Chang; Meihua Song; Junqing Ni; Lingyang Xu; Lupei Zhang; Junya Li; Huijiang Gao
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  Estimates of genomic inbreeding and identification of candidate regions that differ between Chinese indigenous sheep breeds.

Authors:  Jiaxin Liu; Liangyu Shi; Yang Li; Liang Chen; Dorian Garrick; Lixian Wang; Fuping Zhao
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2021-08-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.