Literature DB >> 30135343

Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

Hiroshi Hashiguchi1, Satoshi Iwashita2, Kazumasa Abe1, Kentaro Sonoki1, Minoru Yoneda2, Shinro Takai2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate mid- and long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of arthroscopic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCLR) with an artificial ligament for acute dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ).
METHODS: Twelve male patients (average age at the time of surgery: 40.8 years, range: 21-64 years) underwent ACCLR with an artificial ligament for acute dislocation of the ACJ type III or type V according to the Rockwood classification. Arthroscopic surgery was performed with the patient under general anesthesia and interscalene brachial plexus block in the beach-chair position. Reduction of the ACJ was performed manually or using an elevator under control of an imaging intensifier. The ACJ was fixed temporarily with a Kirschner wire. Bone tunnels of the coracoid process and clavicle were made with a cannulated drill. An artificial ligament was pulled out through the bone tunnels and fixed on the upper surface of the clavicle with a staple and interference screw, and on the undersurface of the coracoid process with an Endobutton. The shoulder was immobilized with a shoulder brace for 4 weeks postoperatively, and rehabilitation was started in the first postoperative week. The Japan Shoulder Society Acromioclavicular Joint Function Assessment (JSS-ACJ) score was used for evaluation of clinical outcomes, and plain radiographs were performed after a minimum follow-up period of 5 years postoperatively.
RESULTS: The average follow-up period after surgery was 106.3 months (range: 62-128 months). The average postoperative JSS-ACJ score was 97.2 points (range: 92-100). The seven patients who had been playing sports before injury all returned to their pre-injury level. No patients complained of pain or shoulder dysfunction in daily activities, work, or sports. There were no complications such as neurovascular injuries during surgery, infection, or foreign body reaction from the artificial ligament. Radiographs at the final follow-up showed subluxation of the ACJ and non-symptomatic osteoarthritic changes of the ACJ in two patients, respectively.
CONCLUSION: ACCLR for acute dislocation of the ACJ is a useful surgical procedure that gives satisfactory clinical and radiologic outcomes on mid- and long-term follow-up. ACCLR can stabilize vertical instability of the ACJ. If instability in the horizontal direction remains, repair or reconstruction of the acromioclavicular ligament should be added to prevent osteoarthritic changes of the ACJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acromioclavicular joint dislocation; arthroscopic reconstruction; artificial ligament; coracoclavicular ligament

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30135343     DOI: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2018_85-24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nippon Med Sch        ISSN: 1345-4676            Impact factor:   0.920


  8 in total

1.  Suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation.

Authors:  Yingliang Liu; Xu Zhang; Yadong Yu; Weifeng Ding; Yong Gao; Yanting Wang; Rong Yang; Vikas Dhawan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  The prevalence of intraarticular associated lesions after acute acromioclavicular joint injuries is 20%. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Miguel Santiago Moreno Romero; Jorge Diaz Heredia; Raquel Ruiz Díaz; Alfonso Muriel; Jesus López-Alcalde
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Cochrane in CORR®: Surgical Versus Conservative Interventions For Treating Acromioclavicular Dislocation of The Shoulder in Adults.

Authors:  Darren L de Sa; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Anatomy and Correlation of the Coracoid Process and Coracoclavicular Ligament Based on Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstruction and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Lan Xin; Jin Luo; Mingying Chen; Bing He; Bi Tang; Chunyang Tang; Dongyu Zhang; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-04-24

6.  Biomechanical testing of three coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction techniques with a 3D printing navigation template for clavicle-coracoid drilling.

Authors:  Ji Qi; Shijie Fu; Ruiyue Ping; Kai Wu; Ziyu Feng; Yanxiao Xu; Xiaoguang Guo; Dingkun Lin; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

7.  A modified single-endobutton technique combined with nice knot for treatment of Rockwood type III or V acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Fangning Hu; Shumei Han; Fanxiao Liu; Zhuang Wang; Honglei Jia; Fu Wang; Lingfei Hu; Jing Chen; Bomin Wang; Yongliang Yang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Anchorless Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Repair Using a Graft-Passing Instrument to Pass Suture Under the Coracoid.

Authors:  Shane Rayos Del Sol; Therese Dela Rueda; Steven Perinovic; Moyukh O Chakrabarti; Stewart Bryant; Brandon Gardner; Patrick J McGahan; James L Chen
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-12-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.