Literature DB >> 30134738

Value proposition of robotic total knee arthroplasty: what can robotic technology deliver in 2018 and beyond?

Michael A Mont1,2, Anton Khlopas1, Morad Chughtai1, Jared M Newman3, Mathew Deren1, Assem A Sultan1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has undergone marked development and increasingly gained interest with multiple studies demonstrating excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes. However, a value assessment that encompasses other aspects related to the adoption of this technology is necessary to fully appreciate the cost/benefit ratio and potential present and future returns. Due to the relative paucity of evidence, this review was conducted to compare newer generation robotic TKA systems vs. historic ones and we evaluated: 1) clinical outcomes; 2) radiographic outcomes; 3) safety; 4) learning curve; 5) operating room efficiency; 6) effect on ergonomic health; and 7) cost analysis of robotic - assisted TKA to understand their value proposition. AREAS COVERED: Comprehensive and detailed discussion of past and contemporary robotic-arm assisted TKA systems. What are the clinical and radiological outcomes and how robotic systems have evolved to offer potential advantages in 2018. EXPERT COMMENTARY: Robotic systems for TKA have undergone substantial development with proven excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes. However, there are still limitations to overcome. Overall, recent robotic technology is on a steep curve of adoption and expected only to grow, backed by the demonstrated clinical success and cost - benefit value that is projected to favor further growth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic; robotic total knee arthroplasty; robotic-arm assisted; total knee arthroplasty; value proposition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30134738     DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1515011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices        ISSN: 1743-4440            Impact factor:   3.166


  4 in total

1.  Implementation of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty in the public health system: a comparative cost analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Steffens; Sascha Karunaratne; Kate McBride; Sanjeev Gupta; Mark Horsley; Brett Fritsch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Less iatrogenic soft-tissue damage utilizing robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty when compared with a manual approach: A blinded assessment.

Authors:  Emily L Hampp; Nipun Sodhi; Laura Scholl; Matthew E Deren; Zachary Yenna; Geoffrey Westrich; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.853

3.  The initial learning curve for the ROSA® Knee System can be achieved in 6-11 cases for operative time and has similar 90-day complication rates with improved implant alignment compared to manual instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luc Vanlommel; Enrico Neven; Mike B Anderson; Liesbeth Bruckers; Jan Truijen
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-12-20

Review 4.  A clinical review of robotic navigation in total knee arthroplasty: historical systems to modern design.

Authors:  Ahmed Siddiqi; Timothy Horan; Robert M Molloy; Michael R Bloomfield; Preetesh D Patel; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-04-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.