| Literature DB >> 30134560 |
Tao Zhang1, Isis P A F Souza2, Jiahe Xu3, Vitor C Almeida4, Tewodros Asefa5,6.
Abstract
A series of mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride (mpg-C₃Entities:
Keywords: copper nanoparticles; mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride; photocatalysis; photodegradation; tartrazine yellow
Year: 2018 PMID: 30134560 PMCID: PMC6163193 DOI: 10.3390/nano8090636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Scheme 1Schematic illustration of the procedure used to synthesize y-mpg-C3N4-x and Cu-22-mpg-C3N4-1 materials, where y and x represent the size of the silica nanoparticles used as templates and the mass ratio of melamine-to-silica nanoparticles used for the synthesis of the materials, respectively.
Figure 1(a) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of 12-mpg-C3N4− materials synthesized using different mass ratios of melamine-to-silica nanoparticles and (b) their corresponding pore size distributions.
Scheme 2Proposed processes leading to different 12-mpg-C3N4-x materials from melamine/silica nanoparticles composite precursors containing different mass ratios of melamine-to-silica nanoparticles.
Figure 2(a) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of different y-mpg-C3N4-1 materials synthesized from melamine/silica nanoparticles composite precursors containing different mass ratios of melamine-to-silica nanoparticles and (b) their corresponding pore size distributions.
Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area, average Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) pore size, and pore volume of different 12-mpg-C3N4- materials.
| Size of SiO2 Nanoparticles ( | Mass Ratio of Melamine-to-SiO2 Nanoparticles ( | BET Surface Area (m2/g) | Average Pore Size (nm) a | Pore Volume (cm3/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | - b | 3 | - c | 0.04 |
| 12 | 0.25 | 7 | - c | 0.06 |
| 12 | 0.5 | 110 | 6.2 | 0.22 |
| 12 | 1 | 136 | 11.7 | 0.27 |
| 12 | 4 | 9 | - c | 0.05 |
a Pore size is measured based on the adsorption data. b No colloidal silica nanoparticles were used in this case. Melamine was carbonized and the carbon materials obtained from it was characterized for comparison. c No definite value was obtained here, perhaps due to the largely non-porous structure in the material.
BET surface area, average BJH pore size, and pore volume of different y-mpg-C3N4-1 materials.
| Size of SiO2 Nanoparticles ( | Mass ratio of Melamine-to-SiO2 Nanoparticles ( | BET Surface Area (m2/g) | Average Pore Size (nm) a | Pore Volume (cm3/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 1 | 136 | 11.7 | 0.27 |
| 22 | 1 | 118 | 22.5 | 0.56 |
| 47 | 1 | 92 | 43.6 | 0.88 |
| 79 | 1 | 73 | ca. 80 | 1.05 |
a Pore size is measured based on the adsorption data.
Figure 3Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of the series of y-mpg-C3N4-1 and Cu-22-mpg-C3N4-1 materials synthesized using different sizes of silica nanoparticles as templates and modified with different loadings of Cu: (a) 12-mpg-C3N4-1; (b) 22-mpg-C3N4-1; (c) 47-mpg-C3N4-1; (d) 79-mpg-C3N4-1; (e) 5Cu-22-mpg-C3N4-1; and (f) 10Cu-22-mpg-C3N4-1.
Figure 4(a) Physical appearance of 22-mpg-C3N4-1, 5Cu-22-mpg-C3N4-1, and 10Cu-22-mpg-C3N4-1 materials (from left to right); (b) UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) of 22-mpg-C3N4-1, 5Cu-22-mpg-C3N4-1, and 10Cu-22-mpg-C3N4-1 and (c) the corresponding plots of transformed Kubelka–Munk function versus the energy of incident light.
Figure 5Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves obtained in air for 22-mpg-C3N4-1, 5Cu-22-mpg-C3N4-1 and 10Cu-22-mpg-C3N4-1 materials.
Figure 6X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of 22-mpg-C3N4-1, 5Cu-22-mpg-C3N4-1 and 10Cu-22-mpg-C3N4-1 materials.
Figure 7(a) XPS survey spectra of 10Cu-22-mpg-C3N4-1; High-resolution XPS spectra of (b) C 1s peak; (c) N 1s peak and (d) Cu 2p peak of 10Cu-22-mpg-C3N4-1.
Figure 8Degradation profiles of tartrazine yellow over the as-prepared mpg-C3N4 and Cu-mpg-C3N4 photocatalysts.