Literature DB >> 30134140

Measurement of elongate mineral particles: What we should measure and how do we do it?

Eric J Chatfield1.   

Abstract

The length distributions of single fibrils of Coalinga, UICC-B and wet dispersed chrysotile were measured by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). It was found that the distributions significantly diverged above approximately 10 μm (μm) in length, corresponding to differences in published results of animal experiments. This result is in contrast to published data in which counting of an insufficient number of fibers resulted in an erroneous conclusion that the length distribution of Coalinga chrysotile fibrils was indistinguishable from those of other sources of chrysotile. The size distributions of the respirable particle size fractions from acknowledged tremolite asbestos samples were found to be dominated by elongate particles longer than 5 μm that are within the dimensional range of non-asbestiform amphiboles. Prior studies have shown that these elongate particles obscure a correlation between a specific size range of particles and results of animal implantation studies that used tremolite of various morphologies. In the prior studies, a reference protocol was developed from four crushed non-asbestiform amphiboles to differentiate the size range of amphibole particles that correlates with the mesothelioma frequencies observed in the animal studies. In the work reported here, this correlation was tested with TEM analyses of amphiboles from Libby, MT, Sparta, NJ and Homestake mine, Lead, SD, which represent known environmental/occupational situations. Further TEM analyses of the tremolite samples used in the original animal implantation studies have also shown that the numbers of elongate tremolite particles with lengths ≤5 μm implanted into the animals are not correlated with the observed mesothelioma frequencies.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amphibole; Asbestos; Chrysotile; Elongate mineral particle; Fiber; Mesothelioma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30134140     DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2018.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  3 in total

1.  Aerodynamic size separation of glass fiber aerosols.

Authors:  Taekhee Lee; Bon Ki Ku; Rachel Walker; Pramod Kulkarni; Teresa Barone; Steven Mischler
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Asbestos and Other Hazardous Fibrous Minerals: Potential Exposure Pathways and Associated Health Risks.

Authors:  Terri-Ann Berry; Elena Belluso; Ruggero Vigliaturo; Reto Gieré; Edward A Emmett; Joseph R Testa; Gregor Steinhorn; Shannon L Wallis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Integration of Evidence on Community Cancer Risks from Elongate Mineral Particles in Silver Bay, Minnesota.

Authors:  Linda D Dell; Alexa E Gallagher; Lisa J Yost; Kenneth A Mundt
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.000

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.