Davide Stefani1, Kevin J Weiland2, Maxim Skripnik3,4, Chunwei Hsu1, Mickael L Perrin1,5, Marcel Mayor2,6,7, Fabian Pauly3,4, Herre S J van der Zant1. 1. Kavli Institute of Nanoscience , Delft University of Technology , 2600 GA Delft , The Netherlands. 2. Department of Chemistry , University of Basel , 4056 Basel , Switzerland. 3. Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University , Onna-son , Okinawa 904-0395 , Japan. 4. Department of Physics , University of Konstanz , 78457 Konstanz , Germany. 5. Transport at Nanoscale Interfaces Laboratory , Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology , 8600 Dübendorf , Switzerland. 6. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) , P.O. Box 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe , Germany. 7. Lehn Institute of Functional Materials, School of Chemistry , Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou 510275 , China.
Abstract
An appealing feature of molecular electronics is the possibility of inducing changes in the orbital structure through external stimuli. This can provide functionality on the single-molecule level that can be employed for sensing or switching purposes if the associated conductance changes are sizable upon application of the stimuli. Here, we show that the room-temperature conductance of a spring-like molecule can be mechanically controlled up to an order of magnitude by compressing or elongating it. Quantum-chemistry calculations indicate that the large conductance variations are the result of destructive quantum interference effects between the frontier orbitals that can be lifted by applying either compressive or tensile strain to the molecule. When periodically modulating the electrode separation, a conductance modulation at double the driving frequency is observed, providing a direct proof for the presence of quantum interference. Furthermore, oscillations in the conductance occur when the stress built up in the molecule is high enough to allow the anchoring groups to move along the surface in a stick-slip-like fashion. The mechanical control of quantum interference effects results in the largest-gauge factor reported for single-molecule devices up to now, which may open the door for applications in, e.g., a nanoscale mechanosensitive sensing device that is functional at room temperature.
An appealing feature of molecular electronics is the possibility of inducing changes in the orbital structure through external stimuli. This can provide functionality on the single-molecule level that can be employed for sensing or switching purposes if the associated conductance changes are sizable upon application of the stimuli. Here, we show that the room-temperature conductance of a spring-like molecule can be mechanically controlled up to an order of magnitude by compressing or elongating it. Quantum-chemistry calculations indicate that the large conductance variations are the result of destructive quantum interference effects between the frontier orbitals that can be lifted by applying either compressive or tensile strain to the molecule. When periodically modulating the electrode separation, a conductance modulation at double the driving frequency is observed, providing a direct proof for the presence of quantum interference. Furthermore, oscillations in the conductance occur when the stress built up in the molecule is high enough to allow the anchoring groups to move along the surface in a stick-slip-like fashion. The mechanical control of quantum interference effects results in the largest-gauge factor reported for single-molecule devices up to now, which may open the door for applications in, e.g., a nanoscale mechanosensitive sensing device that is functional at room temperature.
In recent
years, studies on
single-molecule junctions have rapidly become a mature research field.[1,2] The combination of the structural diversity accessible by synthetic
chemistry with the continuously improving skills of experimental and
theoretical physics enabled the exploration of individual molecules
as the tiniest functional building blocks for electronic circuits
and sensors.[3,4] The steady refinement of the break-junction
technique also allowed to study correlations between mechanical manipulations
and transport features at the single-molecule level in a systematic
way.[5] Examples include binary switching
through mechanical control of the metal–molecule contact geometry[6] or through stereoelectronic effects,[7] mechanical-stress-sensitive redox chromophores,[8] and coordination compounds that show spin-state
switching under mechanical stress.[9] Furthermore,
the sensitivity of the technique makes it possible to observe intermolecular
behaviors such as π-stacking,[10,11] and more recently,
the interdependence of conductance and frontier orbitals involved
in the π-stacking[12,13] could be directly demonstrated.[14]Particularly interesting are destructive
quantum interference effects
leading to a strong suppression of electron transmission at specific
energies, which make them an ideal feature for applications in, e.g.,
thermo-[15] or voltage-dependent switching.[16] Their manipulation has been reported by external
means including solid-state[17] or electrochemical
gating,[18] humidity,[19] and the sliding of π-stacked molecules relative to
each other.[14] Deliberate manipulation of
the latter, however, remains elusive as it requires strict temperature
conditions and is based on intermolecular interactions. In particular,
the intermolecular character requires the coincidental presence of
two molecules inside the junction. For this reason, approaches that
intramolecularly imitate intermolecular π-stacking move into
the focus of interest. Along these lines, the [2.2]paracyclophane
(PC) compound is highly appealing.[20] First
described by Farthing et al. in 1949, it consists of two stacked benzene
rings that are mechanically stabilized by two nonconjugated linkers.[21] Integrated as central unit of an oligo-phenylene-ethynylene
(OPE) rod with terminal binding groups to gold electrodes (Figure ), we show here that
using a mechanically controlled break junction (MCBJ) the π-stacking
(and, therefore, the conductance) can be modulated by exerting a mechanical
shear force to it. Simulations based on density functional theory
(DFT) reveal a sensitive correlation between electrode displacement
and molecular conductance, which is interpreted in terms of quantum
interference effects between the frontier orbitals.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic illustration
of the break-junction experiment of
the OPE-linked PC molecule trapped between nanoelectrodes (top panel),
together with a presentation displaying, as springs, the combinations
of mechanosensitive structures in the molecular design (bottom drawing
in this panel). (b) Solid-state molecular structure determined by
single-crystal X-ray analysis. (c) Possible behavior of the molecule
under applied force: (I) elongation of the molecule under pulling
force of the electrodes, (II) junction with the molecule in its relaxed
configuration, and (III) compression results in a shortening of the
overall junction length. The simulated conductance (in units of the
conductance quantum G0 = 2e2/h) as a function of the applied mechanical stress
is displayed as the drawn line; the three cases (I–III) are
indicated by the colored circles.
(a) Schematic illustration
of the break-junction experiment of
the OPE-linked PC molecule trapped between nanoelectrodes (top panel),
together with a presentation displaying, as springs, the combinations
of mechanosensitive structures in the molecular design (bottom drawing
in this panel). (b) Solid-state molecular structure determined by
single-crystal X-ray analysis. (c) Possible behavior of the molecule
under applied force: (I) elongation of the molecule under pulling
force of the electrodes, (II) junction with the molecule in its relaxed
configuration, and (III) compression results in a shortening of the
overall junction length. The simulated conductance (in units of the
conductance quantum G0 = 2e2/h) as a function of the applied mechanical stress
is displayed as the drawn line; the three cases (I–III) are
indicated by the colored circles.
Results
The employed molecule and the conceptual idea
behind the mechanical conductance manipulation are displayed in Figure . The molecule consists
of a motif in which two ethynylphenylthiols are bound to PC in such
a way that the connection resembles a para substitution in benzene.[22,23] The thiol groups are connected in the para position of the outer
benzene rings with respect to the PC building block, directing the
current path through the PC and offering considerable mechanical stability
between gold electrodes.[24] The molecular
motif and substitution pattern allow for flexibility by stretching
of the PC; the ethynylphenylthiol building block, however, only offers
limited movement upon application of a pulling force on the molecule
(Figure c). High-pressure
solid state absorption experiments on PC derivatives show shortened
distances between [25] When the thiol
groups are moved apart, the applied tensile force is relayed to the
central PC unit along the axis connecting the anchoring groups (Figure S4). Our DFT calculations show that the
alkynes are more susceptible to compressive motions, whereas the PC
subunit only stretches after these are fully extended. It is noteworthy
that electrical transport studies through monolayers consisting of
the proposed molecular rods and similar PC-containing subunits have
been reported.[23,26] However, the limited control
over the number of molecules inside the junction made the interpretation
of the results challenging.
Single-Molecule Experiments
The
target molecule was
synthesized by adapting literature-known procedures;[27,28] its structure was unambiguously verified by single-crystal X-ray
analysis (Figure b).
Details of the synthetic protocols are provided in the Supporting Information, together with the analytical
data corroborating its identity, which is in agreement with the data
already reported.[23] The molecular conductance
was investigated using the MCBJ technique under ambient conditions.
In this technique, atomically sharp electrodes are formed in a lithographically
defined gold wire and repeatedly opened and closed with sub-nanometer
accuracy. The measurement of the conductance as the electrodes are
continuously moved further apart constitutes a so-called breaking
trace. Further details about the MCBJ setup and the measuring technique
have been described elsewhere.[29,30]Fast-breaking
measurements were performed to characterize the conductance of the
OPE-linked PC molecules.[31] The two-dimensional
histogram in Figure a shows the distribution of conductance versus electrode displacement.
Fitting a log-normal distribution to the one-dimensional histogram
constructed from the same data (Figure S5a) reveals that the most-probable conductance value is 3.7 ×
10–6 G0, where G0 = 2e2/h is the quantum of conductance.
Interestingly, inspection of individual traces shows the appearance
of pronounced oscillations in the conductance as the electrodes are
pulled from one another, as illustrated in Figure b for four different samples. These oscillations
are found in a large fraction of the molecular traces (40%) and have
an amplitude up to an order of magnitude. The inset of Figure a presents a histogram of the
spacing of the individual peaks, showing a periodicity of about 0.5
nm (see Supporting Information section II-1 for more details). Note that such oscillations are absent in the
control measurements without the molecule (Figure S10).
Figure 2
(a) Two-dimensional histogram built from 3000
consecutive
breaking traces collected after deposition of the solution containing
the molecule displayed in Figure . The applied bias is 100 mV, and the electrode speed
is 4.0 nm/s. A single breaking trace (black line) has been overlaid
as an example. The inset shows the peak-separation distribution. (b)
Examples of breaking traces, showing oscillations in conductance as
a function of displacement. The traces are taken from four different
samples and are offset in the x-axis for clarity.
The first trace comes from sample A, shown in panel a; samples B–D
are presented in Figures S6–S9 alongside
more examples of breaking traces.
(a) Two-dimensional histogram built from 3000
consecutive
breaking traces collected after deposition of the solution containing
the molecule displayed in Figure . The applied bias is 100 mV, and the electrode speed
is 4.0 nm/s. A single breaking trace (black line) has been overlaid
as an example. The inset shows the peak-separation distribution. (b)
Examples of breaking traces, showing oscillations in conductance as
a function of displacement. The traces are taken from four different
samples and are offset in the x-axis for clarity.
The first trace comes from sample A, shown in panel a; samples B–D
are presented in Figures S6–S9 alongside
more examples of breaking traces.To investigate in more detail the dependence of the molecular
conductance
on the electrode displacement, we performed conductance measurements
with modulated electrode spacing.[32] In
this experiment, the MCBJ was initially stretched to a few-atoms width
(about 3 G0) and allowed to self-break by its surface tension
to form atomically sharp electrodes.[33] Next,
the electrodes were separated by a distance equal to the length of
the molecule to recognize, by evaluating the conductance, whether
the trapping of a molecule occurred: if the conductance is found to
be larger than 10–6 G0, a molecule is
presumably connected between the two electrodes, and a triangular
wave is applied to the piezoelectric stack that controls the electrode
positions (Figure a). Note that a higher voltage on the piezoelectric stack corresponds
to a larger electrode separation. Hundreds of such so-called distance-modulation
traces are collected and from them a conductance histogram is built,
similar to that obtained for fast-breaking measurements. Fitting a
log-normal distribution to this histogram yields a peak at 2.7 ×
10–6 G0, a value close to that found
for fast-breaking measurements (Figure S5b). Thus, molecular traces in this measurement appear at approximately
the same conductance values as found for the fast-breaking measurements
and have a long lifetime, consistently surviving for the entire modulation
time of 120 s.
Figure 3
(a) Examples of distance-modulation traces (sample B).
The blue,
orange, and green lines (middle and bottom panel) represent three
different conductance measurements, whereas the purple line (top panel)
represents the voltage applied to the piezoelectric stack. The applied
piezo voltage translates into a peak-to-peak distance of 5.0 Å,
and a positive voltage corresponds to a larger electrode distance.
The total modulation time is 120 s at a frequency of 0.5 Hz. The conductance
responds to the electrode-separation modulation either in-phase (orange),
in antiphase (blue), or with double the modulation frequency (green).
An example of a full measurement, extending over 120 s, is shown in Figures S17 and S19. (b) Distribution of absolute
values of gauge factors obtained from 123 selected traces of the distance-modulation
measurements performed on sample B. The number in the figure corresponds
to the peak value of the distribution.
(a) Examples of distance-modulation traces (sample B).
The blue,
orange, and green lines (middle and bottom panel) represent three
different conductance measurements, whereas the purple line (top panel)
represents the voltage applied to the piezoelectric stack. The applied
piezo voltage translates into a peak-to-peak distance of 5.0 Å,
and a positive voltage corresponds to a larger electrode distance.
The total modulation time is 120 s at a frequency of 0.5 Hz. The conductance
responds to the electrode-separation modulation either in-phase (orange),
in antiphase (blue), or with double the modulation frequency (green).
An example of a full measurement, extending over 120 s, is shown in Figures S17 and S19. (b) Distribution of absolute
values of gauge factors obtained from 123 selected traces of the distance-modulation
measurements performed on sample B. The number in the figure corresponds
to the peak value of the distribution.As illustrated in Figures 3a and S12–S16, as the gap size increases, the
conductance can either increase or decrease. In the former case, we
define the conductance changes to be in phase with the gap size modulation
(orange curve in Figure a). In the latter, it is the other way around: the conductance change
is in antiphase with the gap-size modulation (blue curve in Figure a). About 32% of
the molecular traces show in-phase conductance variations, 28% appear
to respond in antiphase, and about 40% show a mixture of both or a
more-complex response (Figures S13–S17). Most of the conductance traces show these conductance variations
at the same frequency as the driving modulation (Figure S18); however, surprisingly, many (31%) respond at
double the driving frequency. The green curve in Figure a is an example of this.
Theoretical
Calculations
To shed more light on these
experimental observations, DFT-based calculations were carried out.
For the evaluation of the conductance, we used a proprietary framework.[34] To start, we place the molecule between two
pyramidal gold leads, as shown in Figure b. The upper electrode exhibits an atomically
sharp tip, while the tip atom is removed for the lower one. By the
placement of a terminal sulfur atom of the molecule at the hollow
site of the lower pyramid, it binds to three gold atoms. Compared
to the sulfur–gold bonding at the top lead, the stronger bonding
of the sulfur atom to the hollow site ensures a stable mechanical
connection, and the sulfur atom at the upper electrode starts sliding
down the gold facets as the contact is being stretched.
Figure 4
(a) Calculated
conductance and total energy of the system during
gap opening. (b) Selection of snapshots illustrating the stick–slip
motion. A video of the simulated stick–slip motion can be found
in the Supporting Information.
(a) Calculated
conductance and total energy of the system during
gap opening. (b) Selection of snapshots illustrating the stick–slip
motion. A video of the simulated stick–slip motion can be found
in the Supporting Information.The total energy and conductance of this system
show pronounced
jumps at certain displacements during the gap opening. The snapshots
at these displacements are shown in Figure b and reveal the expected movement of the
sulfur atom. The displacement between snapshots iii and v (just after
the sulfur atom jumped to the next gold atom) amounts to 2.8 Å,
which is close to the gold–gold bond length of 2.89 Å
in the simulated leads. The molecule in snapshots i, iii, and v is
close to its relaxed gas-phase configuration (discussed below) and
exhibits a low conductance. Upon further stretching, the conductance
rises until it eventually levels off and reaches a local maximum at
snapshots ii and iv. At this point, the sulfur anchor slips onto the
next gold atom, thus releasing the mechanical tension in the molecule
and restoring the conductance to a low value (panels iii and v). After
the sulfur atom has reached the last gold atom of the upper lead,
it finally loses its connection: the junction breaks and the molecule
snaps back, as shown in snapshot vi. Thus, distancing of the electrodes
leads to a stick–slip-like motion of the molecule along the
surface of one of the electrodes.In a detailed analysis of
the displacement-dependent conductance,
we study the molecule between two hollow leads, in which each sulfur
binds to three gold atoms of the respective lead. This allows us to
concentrate on the deformations of the actual molecule: the rigid
bonding of the hollow–hollow configuration ensures that the
lead displacement is directly passed to the molecule, minimizing deformations
of the lead-molecule bonds. Starting from the configuration with minimal
energy, corresponding to a molecule close to its relaxed state in
the gas phase, the leads are either separated farther apart (positive
displacement) or brought closer together (negative displacement),
thereby stretching or compressing the molecule. The resulting conductance
shows a pronounced dip at a well-determined displacement, which we
define here as zero (see Figure b). The conductance rapidly increases when the molecule
is either stretched or compressed from this position. The deformation
in the stretched molecule is mainly identified with the shifting of
the stacked benzene rings.
Figure 5
(a) Frontier orbitals of the molecule. The orbitals
are either
symmetric (GPH and GPL) or antisymmetric (GPH–1 and GPL+1)
with respect to the center of the molecule. The frontier orbitals
are shown in the gas phase for clarity (with the sulfur atoms
“terminated” with one gold atom each) because they do
not change significantly when the gold leads are attached to the molecule.
(b) Conductance (horizontal black line in panel c) and total energy.
(c) Transmission map of the molecule between two leads from DFT calculations.
The horizontal yellow traces in the map arise from orbitals that can
be related to the gas-phase frontier orbitals. An anti-resonance is
observed between the frontier orbital traces. It shifts in energy
as the displacement is varied. The positions at which the pairs of
GPH–1 and GPH and of GPL and GPL+1 degenerate are marked with
circles.
(a) Frontier orbitals of the molecule. The orbitals
are either
symmetric (GPH and GPL) or antisymmetric (GPH–1 and GPL+1)
with respect to the center of the molecule. The frontier orbitals
are shown in the gas phase for clarity (with the sulfur atoms
“terminated” with one gold atom each) because they do
not change significantly when the gold leads are attached to the molecule.
(b) Conductance (horizontal black line in panel c) and total energy.
(c) Transmission map of the molecule between two leads from DFT calculations.
The horizontal yellow traces in the map arise from orbitals that can
be related to the gas-phase frontier orbitals. An anti-resonance is
observed between the frontier orbital traces. It shifts in energy
as the displacement is varied. The positions at which the pairs of
GPH–1 and GPH and of GPL and GPL+1 degenerate are marked with
circles.By evaluating the transmission
in an energy range between −2
and +3 eV around the Fermi energy EF for
each displacement step, we obtain the transmission map in Figure c. It reveals a transmission
valley (purple diagonal line) between the traces related to the molecular
frontier orbitals (yellow horizontal lines). The conductance dip in Figure b can be traced back
to the intersection of the transmission valley and the Fermi energy.
In other words, the energy position of the dip can be tuned by the
lead separation. In the following, we present the underlying mechanism
based on quantum interference of the molecular frontier orbitals.A closer look at Figure c reveals HOMO and LUMO pairs that arise from the HOMO and
LUMO states of the OPE units and are typically slightly split by the
weak coupling through the PC core. To distinguish the character of
the HOMO–1, HOMO, LUMO, and LUMO+1, we relate them to the frontier
orbitals in the gas phase. For this purpose, we introduce the abbreviations
GPH–1 to GPL+1, where GPH and GPL denote the gas-phase HOMO
and LUMO, respectively. The orbitals are either symmetric (GPH and
GPL) or anti-symmetric (GPH–1 and GPL+1) with respect to the
center of the molecule. The crucial aspect is now that the energy
of the frontier orbitals depends on the displacement. The states within
HOMO and LUMO pairs, GPH–1 and GPH as well as GPL and GPL+1,
eventually change their energetic order in the studied displacement
window between around −4 to +4 Å. The displacements of
the degeneracy points, at which these reversals take place, differ
for the occupied and unoccupied states. They are located at d = −1.0 and +2.0 Å, respectively, as marked
by circles in Figure c. According to the theory of quantum interference[12,35] the orbital symmetry leads to a pronounced destructive interference
feature in the HOMO–LUMO gap between displacements from −1.0
to +2.0 Å when the HOMO and LUMO pairs are ordered as in the
gas phase. Outside of this displacement window, the molecular orbital
pairs GPH–1 and GPH or GPL and GPL+1 rearrange in energy, thereby
lifting the condition for destructive interference. Indeed, we can
reproduce the main features of the conductance map by considering
the displacement-dependent energies of the four frontier orbitals
and their symmetries, as corroborated further in section III of the Supporting Information.
Discussion and
Concluding Remarks
With the insights
provided by the DFT calculations, the pronounced conductance oscillations
can be explained through quantum interference of frontier orbitals
in combination with the molecule acting as a spring when subject to
mechanical deformations. Its relaxed conformation corresponds to the
situation in which the anti-resonance originating from destructive
interference of the HOMO and LUMO is in the vicinity of the Fermi
energy, yielding a low-conductance state. By stretching or compressing
the molecule, the anti-resonance is moved away from the Fermi energy,
which leads to an increase of the conductance. The experimentally
observed oscillations in conductance during continuous opening of
the junction (Figure b) can then be associated with the stick–slip motion of the
anchoring sulfur atoms on the gold surface, as this process releases
the built-up mechanical strain in a semi-periodic fashion. Ab initio
molecular-dynamics calculations at room temperature predict that Au–Au
bonds should break instead of the Au–S bonds.[36] However, if a gold adatom attached to a sulfur anchor was
dragged along the gold electrode instead of the S itself, this would
not lead to a qualitative change of the stick–slip picture.The different behaviors (in-phase, antiphase, and frequency doubling)
observed in the distance-modulation measurements (simulation: second
panel in Figure a;
experiment: bottom two panels in Figure a) can be attributed to variations in the
initial molecular configuration at the beginning of the modulation.
Traces that are in phase with the gap modulation are related to molecules
that are pre-stretched in the starting configuration (orange panel
in Figure c and the
“pre-stretched” video in the Supporting Information). The starting point is at positive displacement
and the oscillation takes place at the right lobe of the conductance
curve (orange area in Figure b): an increase in electrode displacement corresponds to a
higher conductance (and a decrease to a lower conductance). Along
a similar line, traces in antiphase with the gap modulation can be
related to molecules that are pre-compressed in the starting configuration
(blue panel in Figure c and the “pre-compressed” video in the Supporting Information) and therefore correspond
to oscillations at the left lobe of the conductance curve (blue area
in Figure b). Traces
with a doubled frequency (such as the green trace in Figure a and the “relaxed”
video in the Supporting Information) are
related to molecules that are close to the relaxed gas-phase geometry,
in which the Fermi energy of the leads is aligned with the position
of the interference dip (green panel, Figure c). In this case, the conductance dip is
crossed two times during each piezo-modulation period, therefore doubling
the frequency of the measured conductance, as can be seen by following
the purple steps in Figure b. The appearance of the doubled frequency is thus a direct
proof of the existence of the destructive interference dip. Importantly,
the ability to mechanically tune the position of this dip to be located
at the Fermi energy can be exploited in future studies and applications
of quantum interference effects.
Figure 6
(a, top panels) Simulation of conductance
traces (second panel)
when the electrode displacement is periodically modulated (top panel)
for three different trapping configurations: pre-stretched (orange),
relaxed (green), and pre-compressed (blue). Centers of oscillation
at +1, 0, and −1 Å, respectively; amplitude of 0.5 Å.
(a, bottom panels) Zoomed-in panel showing the experimental distance-modulation
traces presented in Figure . (b) Calculated conductance vs electrode displacement. The
blue, green, and orange areas (I, II, and III, respectively) show
the portion of the curve spanned in the case of different starting
positions (pre-compressed, relaxed, and pre-stretched, represented
by circles in the same colors). The numbers in the purple circles
represent the position of the electrodes along the oscillation period
in the case of a relaxed trapping configuration. (c) Schematics of
the molecular configurations along a period of electrode distance
modulation. Different starting configurations are represented with
different colors: pre-stretched in orange, relaxed in green, and pre-compressed
in blue. White numbers in purple circles represent the position of
the electrodes along the oscillation period. Note that the molecular
compression and elongation in the simulation is 0.5 Å, a value
smaller than the gap-size variation in the experiment. This can be
rationalized by the elastic response of the sulfur–gold connections
and of the gold atoms in the electrodes themselves.
(a, top panels) Simulation of conductance
traces (second panel)
when the electrode displacement is periodically modulated (top panel)
for three different trapping configurations: pre-stretched (orange),
relaxed (green), and pre-compressed (blue). Centers of oscillation
at +1, 0, and −1 Å, respectively; amplitude of 0.5 Å.
(a, bottom panels) Zoomed-in panel showing the experimental distance-modulation
traces presented in Figure . (b) Calculated conductance vs electrode displacement. The
blue, green, and orange areas (I, II, and III, respectively) show
the portion of the curve spanned in the case of different starting
positions (pre-compressed, relaxed, and pre-stretched, represented
by circles in the same colors). The numbers in the purple circles
represent the position of the electrodes along the oscillation period
in the case of a relaxed trapping configuration. (c) Schematics of
the molecular configurations along a period of electrode distance
modulation. Different starting configurations are represented with
different colors: pre-stretched in orange, relaxed in green, and pre-compressed
in blue. White numbers in purple circles represent the position of
the electrodes along the oscillation period. Note that the molecular
compression and elongation in the simulation is 0.5 Å, a value
smaller than the gap-size variation in the experiment. This can be
rationalized by the elastic response of the sulfur–gold connections
and of the gold atoms in the electrodes themselves.We note that the conductance variations as a function
of displacement
can be used to estimate the gauge factor, characterizing the piezoresistive
response of the molecular spring. The gauge factor is defined as the
relative conductance change divided by displacement normalized to
the molecular length (see Figure b and Supporting Information section II-4 for more details). We find gauge factors exhibiting a
wide distribution with a peak located at GF = 5 and
a tail at higher values, reaching up to 40 orders of magnitude larger
than those that have been reported on single DNA molecules.[37] We expect that thermally occupied ring rotations
of the OPE rods at room temperature will reduce the electronic coupling
in the molecule and the electron delocalization and, hence, the conductance.
Besides the known shortcomings of DFT with regard to the description
of level alignments,[38] this could explain
part of the over-estimation of the theoretically predicted conductance
values in our static DFT geometries. In addition, longitudinal vibrations,
as well as thermal fluctuations, will lead to gap-size modulations
and an effective averaging over a range of junction configurations.
Such vibrationally induced decoherence effects will wash out the interference-induced
conductance minimum.[39] Therefore, a precise
control of the temperature may turn out to be crucial in the optimization
of gauge factors, and the molecule studied here appears to be an ideal
candidate with which to investigate quantum interference effects at
lower temperatures and to quantify if decoherence limits the room-temperature
performance.[39−41] To achieve even-higher gauge factors, it would also
be interesting to explore different chemical designs based on the
mechanical manipulation principle of quantum interference.
Methods
MCBJ Experiments
For MCBJ experiments, a thin (<100
nm) gold wire is lithographically fabricated and suspended on a flexible
substrate. Atomically sharp electrodes are formed when rupturing the
wire in a three-point bending configuration. After the breaking of
the wire, the electrodes can be fused together again by reducing the
mechanical force used to bend the substrate. This opening and closing
of the gap can be controlled with sub-nanometer accuracy on the position
of the electrodes. Further details about the MCBJ setup and the measuring
technique have been described elsewhere.[29,30] The molecule was dissolved in dichloromethane, and the solution
was drop-cast on the MCBJ sample after the characterization of the
bare device (Figure S10). All measurements
were performed in air at room temperature after the evaporation of
the solvent. Concentrations of 9 μM (samples A and B), 90 μM
(sample C), and 900 μM (sample D) have been used, but no significant
dependence on the concentration has been observed.
Fast-Breaking
Measurements
Fast-breaking measurements
were performed by applying a bias of 100 mV and using a constant pulling
speed of the electrodes of 4.0 nm/s. The conductance is recorded until
it falls below the noise level, which is about 5·10–7 G0 in our setup. At this point the electrodes are fused
back and a new trace is recorded. A total of 3000 such traces were
recorded for samples A–C and 5000 for sample D. Further information
on the technique can be found in Frisenda et al.[31]
Distance-Modulation Measurements
In these measurements,
the electrode spacing was modulated to periodically increase and decrease.[32] The MCBJ was initially stretched to a few-atom
width (3 G0) and allowed to self-break by its surface tension
to form atomically sharp electrodes. Then, the electrodes were separated
by 1.75 nm, which is approximately the estimated length of the unstretched
molecule. At this point, a 0.5 Hz triangular wave was applied to the
piezoelectric stack that controls the electrode positions with a peak-to-peak
gap size variation of 5.0 Å (Figure ) or 2.5 Å (Figure S12), depending on the amplitude of the applied piezo voltage.
Note that a higher voltage on the piezoelectric corresponds to a larger
electrode separation.The initial opening of the junction allows
us to recognize if trapping of a molecule occurs because, for a displacement
of 1.75 nm, the tunnelling conductance in the absence of a molecule
is below the noise level of our setup. The modulation was kept for
120 s, after which the junction was stretched until the noise level
was reached and fused back again to start a new cycle. It should be
noted that the initial configuration in a distance-modulation experiment
cannot be controlled.
Simulations
DFT calculations were
carried out with
TURBOMOLE.[42] We used the def-SVP basis
set and the PBE functional.[43,44] During structural relaxations
the total energy was converged to 10–6 au and the
maximum norm of the Cartesian gradient to 10–3 au.
The electronic transmission was evaluated with a proprietary cluster-based
framework. The procedure includes the separation of the system into
semi-infinite leads and a central part, which contains the molecule
and parts of the electrodes. The energy-dependent transmission function
is expressed in terms of non-equilibrium Green’s functions
(NEGFs) of the leads and the central part. The bulk parameters of
the leads were extracted from a cluster of 1415 gold atoms. Further
details on the method can be found in Pauly et al.[34]
Authors: Christian A Martin; Roel H M Smit; Ruud van Egmond; Herre S J van der Zant; Jan M van Ruitenbeek Journal: Rev Sci Instrum Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 1.523
Authors: Huseyin Atesci; Veerabhadrarao Kaliginedi; Jose A Celis Gil; Hiroaki Ozawa; Joseph M Thijssen; Peter Broekmann; Masa-Aki Haga; Sense Jan van der Molen Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Su Ying Quek; Maria Kamenetska; Michael L Steigerwald; Hyoung Joon Choi; Steven G Louie; Mark S Hybertsen; J B Neaton; Latha Venkataraman Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2009-03-01 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Christopher Bruot; Julio L Palma; Limin Xiang; Vladimiro Mujica; Mark A Ratner; Nongjian Tao Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Chunwei Hsu; Werner M Schosser; Patrick Zwick; Diana Dulić; Marcel Mayor; Fabian Pauly; Herre S J van der Zant Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 9.969
Authors: Werner M Schosser; Chunwei Hsu; Patrick Zwick; Katawoura Beltako; Diana Dulić; Marcel Mayor; Herre S J van der Zant; Fabian Pauly Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 7.790