Literature DB >> 30133382

Edge orientation perception during active touch.

Derek Olczak1, Vaishnavi Sukumar1, J Andrew Pruszynski1,2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Previous studies investigating the perceptual attributes of tactile edge orientation processing have applied their stimuli to an immobilized fingertip. Here we tested the perceptual attributes of edge orientation processing when participants actively touched the stimulus. Our participants moved their finger over two pairs of edges, one pair parallel and the other nonparallel to varying degrees, and were asked to identify which of the two pairs was nonparallel. In addition to the psychophysical estimates of edge orientation acuity, we measured the speed at which participants moved their finger and the forces they exerted when moving their finger over the stimulus. We report four main findings. First, edge orientation acuity during active touch averaged 12.4°, similar to that previously reported during passive touch. Second, on average, participants moved their finger over the stimuli at ~20 mm/s and exerted contact forces of ~0.3 N. Third, there was no clear relationship between how people moved their finger or how they pressed on the stimulus and their edge orientation acuity. Fourth, consistent with previous work testing tactile spatial acuity, we found a significant correlation between fingertip size and orientation acuity such that people with smaller fingertips tended to have better orientation acuity. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Edge orientation acuity expressed by the motor system during manipulation is many times better than edge orientation acuity assessed in psychophysical studies where stimuli are applied to a passive fingertip. Here we show that this advantage is not because of movement per se because edge orientation acuity assessed in a psychophysical task, where participants actively move their finger over the stimuli, yields results similar to previous passive psychophysical studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active touch; movement; perception; psychophysics; touch

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30133382     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00280.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  5 in total

1.  Human touch receptors are sensitive to spatial details on the scale of single fingerprint ridges.

Authors:  Ewa Jarocka; J Andrew Pruszynski; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Individual differences impacting skin deformation and tactile discrimination with compliant elastic surfaces.

Authors:  Bingxu Li; Gregory J Gerling
Journal:  World Haptics Conf       Date:  2021-08-23

Review 3.  The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity.

Authors:  Anton R Sobinov; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 38.755

4.  Orientation processing by synaptic integration across first-order tactile neurons.

Authors:  Etay Hay; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  The Repetitive Mechanical Tactile Stimulus Intervention Effects Depend on Input Methods.

Authors:  Hiraku Watanabe; Sho Kojima; Naofumi Otsuru; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.