Literature DB >> 30133071

Fixed-Life or Rechargeable Battery for Deep Brain Stimulation: Which Do Patients Prefer?

Tahir Khaleeq1, Harutomo Hasegawa1, Michael Samuel1, Keyoumars Ashkan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is increasingly used to treat a wide variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Implantable pulse generators (implantable pulse generators/batteries) for DBS were originally only available as a nonrechargeable option. However, there is now a choice between fixed-life and rechargeable batteries, with each having their own advantages and disadvantages. The extent of patient involvement in the choice of battery and the factors that matter to them have not been well studied.
METHODS: Thirty consecutive adult patients with movement disorders attending a pre-DBS clinic were offered a choice of fixed-life or rechargeable battery and completed a questionnaire after the consultation on which factors influenced their decision.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients (63%) chose the fixed-life battery and 11 patients (37%) chose the rechargeable battery. There were no significant differences in age, sex, underlying disease, disease duration or Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) (part 3) score (for patients with Parkinson disease) between those who chose the fixed-life vs. rechargeable battery. Most patients were not concerned about the size of the battery. Equal numbers were concerned about surgery to replace the battery, and less than half were concerned about the need to recharge the battery. More than half of patients felt that an acceptable charging frequency was monthly or yearly, and all patients felt that an acceptable charging duration was less than 1 hour, with half of all patients choosing less than 30 min. The main reasons cited for choosing the fixed-life battery were convenience and concern about forgetting to recharge the battery. The main reason for choosing the rechargeable battery was the avoidance of further surgery. DISCUSSION: Most patients in this adult cohort with movement disorders chose the fixed-life battery. The better lifestyle associated with a fixed-life battery is a major factor influencing their choice. Rechargeable batteries may be more acceptable if the recharging process is improved, more convenient, and discreet. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors' institution has received educational grants from Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific companies.
© 2018 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Battery; deep brain stimulation; implantable pulse generator; movement disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30133071     DOI: 10.1111/ner.12810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  6 in total

1.  Chronic embedded cortico-thalamic closed-loop deep brain stimulation for the treatment of essential tremor.

Authors:  Enrico Opri; Stephanie Cernera; Rene Molina; Robert S Eisinger; Jackson N Cagle; Leonardo Almeida; Timothy Denison; Michael S Okun; Kelly D Foote; Aysegul Gunduz
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Dynamics of device-based treatments for Parkinson's disease in Germany from 2010 to 2017: application of continuous subcutaneous apomorphine, levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, and deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel Richter; Dirk Bartig; Wolfgang Jost; Christoph Jörges; Britta Stumpe; Ralf Gold; Christos Krogias; Lars Tönges
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 3.  Improving long term patient outcomes from deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Andrew Guzick; Patrick J Hunt; Kelly R Bijanki; Sophie C Schneider; Sameer A Sheth; Wayne K Goodman; Eric A Storch
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 4.618

4.  Two-year outcomes of the ARTISAN-SNM study for the treatment of urinary urgency incontinence using the Axonics rechargeable sacral neuromodulation system.

Authors:  Andrea Pezzella; Rebecca McCrery; Felicia Lane; Kevin Benson; Chris Taylor; Osvaldo Padron; Bertil Blok; Stefan de Wachter; Jennifer Gruenenfelder; Mahreen Pakzad; Marie-Aimee Perrouin-Verbe; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Jeffrey Mangel; Kenneth Peters; Michael Kennelly; Andrew Shapiro; Una Lee; Craig Comiter; Margaret Mueller; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Rechargeable Pacemaker Technology in Deep Brain Stimulation: A Step Forward, But Not for Everyone.

Authors:  Joachim Runge; Johanna M Nagel; Christoph Schrader; Assel Saryyeva; Joachim K Krauss
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2021-08-13

Review 6.  Developments in Deep Brain Stimulators for Successful Aging Towards Smart Devices-An Overview.

Authors:  Angelito A Silverio; Lean Angelo A Silverio
Journal:  Front Aging       Date:  2022-04-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.