Literature DB >> 30132821

Therapeutic doses of neostigmine, depolarising neuromuscular blockade and muscle weakness in awake volunteers: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised volunteer study.

N B Kent1, S S Liang2, S Phillips3, N A Smith4, C Khandkar5, M Eikermann6,7, P A Stewart3.   

Abstract

Neostigmine reverses non-depolarising neuromuscular blockade, but may cause muscle weakness when administered after full recovery of neuromuscular function. We hypothesised that neostigmine in therapeutic doses impairs muscle strength and respiratory function in awake healthy volunteers. Twenty-one volunteers were randomised to receive two doses of either intravenous (i.v.) neostigmine 2.5 mg with glycopyrrolate 450 μg (neostigmine group, n = 14) or normal saline 0.9% (placebo group, n = 7). The first dose was administered immediately after obtaining baseline measurements, and the second dose was administered 15 min later. All 14 volunteers in the neostigmine group received the first dose, mean (SD) 35 (5.8) μg.kg-1 , but only nine of these volunteers agreed to receive the second dose, 34 (3.5) ?g.kg-1 . The primary outcome was hand grip strength. Secondary outcomes were train-of-four ratio, single twitch height, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ratio, oxygen saturation, heart rate and mean arterial pressure. The first dose of intravenous neostigmine with glycopyrrolate resulted in reduced grip strength compared with placebo, -20 (20) % vs. +4.3 (9.9) %, p = 0.0016; depolarising neuromuscular blockade with decreased single twitch height, -14 (11) % vs. -3.8 (5.6) %, p = 0.0077; a restrictive spirometry pattern with decreased predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s, -15 (12) % vs. -0.47 (3.4) %, p = 0.0011; and predicted forced vital capacity, -20 (12) % vs. -0.59 (3.2) %, p < 0.0001 at 5 min after administration. The second dose of neostigmine with glycopyrrolate further decreased grip strength mean (SD) -41 (23) % vs. +1.0 (15) %, p = 0.0004; single twitch height -25 (15) % vs. -2.5 (6.6) %, p = 0.0030; predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s -23 (24) % vs. -0.7 (4.4) %, p = 0.0063; and predicted forced vital capacity, -27.1 (22.0) % vs. -0.66 (3.9) %, p = 0.0010. Train-of-four ratio remained unchanged (p = 0.22). In healthy volunteers, therapeutic doses of neostigmine induced significant and dose-dependent muscle weakness, demonstrated by a decrease in maximum voluntary hand grip strength and a restrictive spirometry pattern secondary to depolarising neuromuscular blockade.
© 2018 Association of Anaesthetists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  muscle weakness; neostigmine; neuromuscular blockade reversal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30132821     DOI: 10.1111/anae.14386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Algorithm-based preventive strategies for avoidance of residual neuromuscular blocks].

Authors:  C Unterbuchner; K Ehehalt; B Graf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Does Sugammadex Reduce Postoperative Airway Failure?

Authors:  Brandon M Togioka; Xinling Xu; Valerie Banner-Goodspeed; Matthias Eikermann
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Effects of Sugammadex versus Neostigmine on Intraoperative Coagulation Profiles in Patients with Thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Dizhou Zhao; Jieyu Fang; Wei Xiong; Jun Lin; Wanmei Chen; Chujun Wu
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.162

4.  Required dose of sugammadex or neostigmine for reversal of vecuronium-induced shallow residual neuromuscular block at a train-of-four ratio of 0.3.

Authors:  Jing He; Huan He; Xing Li; Mei Sun; Zhihao Lai; Bo Xu
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.689

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.