Literature DB >> 30132807

Current practice and short-term outcomes of therapeutic mammaplasty in the international TeaM multicentre prospective cohort study.

R L O'Connell1, E Baker2, A Trickey3, T Rattay4, L Whisker5, R D Macmillan5, S Potter3,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic mammaplasty, which combines breast reduction and mastopexy techniques with tumour excision, may extend the boundaries of breast-conserving surgery and improve outcomes for patients, but current practice is unknown and high-quality outcome data are lacking. This prospective multicentre cohort study aimed to explore the practice and short-term outcomes of the technique.
METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing therapeutic mammaplasty at participating centres between 1 September 2016 and 30 June 2017 were recruited to the study. Demographic, preoperative, operative, oncological and complication data were collected. The primary outcome was unplanned reoperation for complications within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included re-excision rates and time to adjuvant therapy.
RESULTS: Overall, 880 patients underwent 899 therapeutic mammaplasty procedures at 50 centres. The most common indications were avoidance of poor cosmetic outcomes associated with standard breast-conserving surgery (702 procedures, 78·1 per cent) or avoidance of mastectomy (379, 42·2 per cent). Wise-pattern skin incisions were the most common (429 of 899, 47·7 per cent), but a range of incisions and nipple-areola pedicles were used. Immediate contralateral symmetrization was performed in one-third of cases (284 of 880, 32·3 per cent). In total, 205 patients (23·3 per cent) developed a complication, but only 25 (2·8 per cent) required reoperation. Median postoperative lesion size was 24·5 (i.q.r. 16-38) mm. Incomplete excision was seen in 132 procedures (14·7 per cent), but completion mastectomy was required for only 51 lesions (5·7 per cent). Median time to adjuvant therapy was 54 (i.q.r. 42-66) days.
CONCLUSION: Therapeutic mammaplasty is a safe and effective alternative to mastectomy or standard breast-conserving surgery. Further work is required to explore the impact of the technique on quality of life, and to establish cost-effectiveness.
© 2018 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30132807     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  8 in total

1.  Batwing mammoplasty: a safe oncoplastic technique for breast conservation in breast cancer patients with gigantomastia.

Authors:  T M Manie; Mmg Youssef; S N Taha; A Rabea; A M Farahat
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The approach to an isolated close anterior margin in breast conserving surgery.

Authors:  L O'Connell; S Walsh; D Evoy; A O'Doherty; C Quinn; J Rothwell; J Geraghty; E W McDermott; R Prichard
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Impact of COVID-19 Disease in Early Breast Cancer Management: A Summary of the Current Evidence.

Authors:  Francisco Pimentel Cavalcante; Edson Abdala; Leonardo Weissmann; Carlos Eduardo Dos Santos Ferreira; Gilberto Amorim; Vilmar Marques de Oliveira; Gisah Guilgen; Luciana Landeiro; João Renato Rebello Pinho; Álvaro Pulchinelli; Heber Ribeiro; Rafael Souza; Daniela Dornelles Rosa
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2022-05

4.  Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study).

Authors:  Charlotte Davies; Christopher Holcombe; Joanna Skillman; Lisa Whisker; William Hollingworth; Carmel Conefrey; Nicola Mills; Paul White; Charles Comins; Douglas Macmillan; Patricia Fairbrother; Shelley Potter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Outcome reporting in therapeutic mammaplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Lee; Richard M Kwasnicki; Hasaan Khan; Yasmin Grant; Abigail Chan; Angela E E Fanshawe; Daniel R Leff
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-11-09

6.  Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes between Chest Wall Perforator Flaps and Therapeutic Mammoplasty.

Authors:  Samreen Khan; John Mathew
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-09-07

7.  Dual-Layer Rotation: A Versatile Therapeutic Mammoplasty Technique.

Authors:  Sarianna Joukainen; Elina Laaksonen; Ritva Vanninen; Outi Kaarela; Mazen Sudah
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.339

8.  Comparative study of surgical and oncological outcomes in oncoplastic versus non oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Natalie R Almeida; Fabrício P Brenelli; Cesar C Dos Santos; Renato Z Torresan; Júlia Y Shinzato; Cassio Cardoso-Filho; Giuliano M Duarte; Nicoli S de Azevedo; Luiz Carlos Zeferino
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2021-06-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.