Literature DB >> 30132803

Risk of repeat cesarean delivery in women undergoing trial of labor: A population-based cohort study.

Charlotte Lindblad Wollmann1,2, Mia Ahlberg1,2, Sissel Saltvedt2, Kari Johansson1, Charlotte Elvander1, Olof Stephansson1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to consult women on best mode of delivery after a first cesarean section, more knowledge regarding risk for a repeat unplanned cesarean is needed. We investigated the association between indication of first cesarean and cervical dilation during labor preceding the first cesarean and risk of repeat cesarean in women undergoing trial of labor.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A population-based cohort study using electronic medical records of all women delivering in the Stockholm-Gotland region, Sweden, between 2008 and 2014. The population consisted of 3116 women with a first cesarean undergoing a trial of labor with a singleton infant in cephalic presentation at ≥37 weeks of gestation. Relative risks (RR) with 95% CI were estimated using Poisson regression analyses.
RESULTS: Women with a first unplanned cesarean had higher risk of repeat cesarean compared with women with elective first cesarean (35.7% vs 20.7%, adjusted RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.43-1.89). In women with a cesarean due to dystocia, increasing cervical dilation in first labor decreased the risk of repeat cesarean in second labor. The adjusted RR of repeat cesarean was 2.48 with dilation ≤5 cm, 1.98 with dilation 6-10 cm, and 1.46 if fully dilated.
CONCLUSIONS: Almost 70% of all women eligible for trial of labor after cesarean had a vaginal birth, even women with a history of labor dystocia had a good chance of success. A greater cervical dilation in the first delivery ending with a cesarean was not in vain, since the chance of vaginal birth in the subsequent delivery increased with greater dilation.
© 2018 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean delivery; labor dystocia; risk ratio; trial of labor after cesarean; vaginal birth after cesarean

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30132803     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  3 in total

1.  Predicting vaginal birth after previous cesarean: Using machine-learning models and a population-based cohort in Sweden.

Authors:  Charlotte Lindblad Wollmann; Kyle D Hart; Can Liu; Aaron B Caughey; Olof Stephansson; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Changes in lower uterine segment thickness during different gestational weeks in pregnant women qualified for trial of labor after cesarean section.

Authors:  Jiaming Rao; Dazhi Fan; Ting Chen; Dongxin Lin; Huiting Ma; Demei Lu; Meng Zeng; Yan Liu; Xiaoling Guo; Zhengping Liu
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 4.447

3.  Risk of negative birth experience in trial of labor after cesarean delivery: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Charlotte Lindblad Wollmann; Can Liu; Sissel Saltvedt; Charlotte Elvander; Mia Ahlberg; Olof Stephansson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.