Stephanie R Rice1, Søren M Bentzen2, Andrew Hanna1, Enid Choi1, Drexell H Boggs3, Young Kwok1, Jalal Hyder4, Steven J Feigenberg5, William F Regine1, Graeme F Woodworth6, Howard M Eisenberg6, Cedric Yu1, Terri F Biggins1, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan7, Paul W Sperduto8, Eduardo Weltman9,10, Minesh P Mehta11. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S. Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. sbentzen@som.umarlyand.edu. 3. Hazelrig Salter Radiation Oncology Center, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, UK. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 6. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 7. Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. 8. Gamma Knife Center, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 9. Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, 04614-001, Brazil. 10. University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. 11. Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): To compare the performance of five prognostic models [RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), Score Index for Radiosurgery in Brain Metastases (SIR), Barnholtz-Sloan-Kattan nomogram (BSKN), diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (dsGPA), and Graded Prognostic Assessment for Lung Cancer Using Molecular Markers (Lung-molGPA)] against actual survival in patients with brain metastases treated with SRS +/- WBRT. MATERIALS/ METHODS: 100 consecutive patients treated with SRS +/- WBRT between January 2006 and July 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were binned according to 33 percentiles of the predicted survival distribution for the BSKN and dsGPA models to compare with LungmolGPA, RPA and SIR. Pearson's correlation coefficients between predicted and observed survival were estimated to quantify the proportion of variance in observed survival. RESULTS: Median survival for the entire cohort was 13.5 months, with predicted vs actual MS by BSKN, SIR, dsGPA, RPA, adenocarcinoma Lung-molGPA, and nonadenocarcinoma Lung-molGPA was 3.8 vs 15.6 months, 7 vs 13.5 months, 9.4 vs 13.5 months, 10.3 vs 13.5 months, 13.7 vs 13.7 months, and 9.8 vs 9.7 months, respectively. The BSKN model and adenocarcinoma LungmolGPA created three groups with a statistically significantly different MS (p = 0.002 and p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: All models under-predicted MS and only the BSKN and Lung-molGPA model stratified patients into three risk groups with statistically significant actual MS. The prognostic groupings of the adenocarcinoma Lung-molGPA group was the best predictor of MS, and showed that we are making improvements in our prognostic ability by utilizing molecular information that is much more widely available in the current treatment era.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): To compare the performance of five prognostic models [RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), Score Index for Radiosurgery in Brain Metastases (SIR), Barnholtz-Sloan-Kattan nomogram (BSKN), diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (dsGPA), and Graded Prognostic Assessment for Lung Cancer Using Molecular Markers (Lung-molGPA)] against actual survival in patients with brain metastases treated with SRS +/- WBRT. MATERIALS/ METHODS: 100 consecutive patients treated with SRS +/- WBRT between January 2006 and July 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were binned according to 33 percentiles of the predicted survival distribution for the BSKN and dsGPA models to compare with LungmolGPA, RPA and SIR. Pearson's correlation coefficients between predicted and observed survival were estimated to quantify the proportion of variance in observed survival. RESULTS: Median survival for the entire cohort was 13.5 months, with predicted vs actual MS by BSKN, SIR, dsGPA, RPA, adenocarcinoma Lung-molGPA, and nonadenocarcinoma Lung-molGPA was 3.8 vs 15.6 months, 7 vs 13.5 months, 9.4 vs 13.5 months, 10.3 vs 13.5 months, 13.7 vs 13.7 months, and 9.8 vs 9.7 months, respectively. The BSKN model and adenocarcinoma LungmolGPA created three groups with a statistically significantly different MS (p = 0.002 and p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: All models under-predicted MS and only the BSKN and Lung-molGPA model stratified patients into three risk groups with statistically significant actual MS. The prognostic groupings of the adenocarcinoma Lung-molGPA group was the best predictor of MS, and showed that we are making improvements in our prognostic ability by utilizing molecular information that is much more widely available in the current treatment era.
Authors: Paul W Sperduto; T Jonathan Yang; Kathryn Beal; Hubert Pan; Paul D Brown; Ananta Bangdiwala; Ryan Shanley; Norman Yeh; Laurie E Gaspar; Steve Braunstein; Penny Sneed; John Boyle; John P Kirkpatrick; Kimberley S Mak; Helen A Shih; Alex Engelman; David Roberge; Nils D Arvold; Brian Alexander; Mark M Awad; Joseph Contessa; Veronica Chiang; John Hardie; Daniel Ma; Emil Lou; William Sperduto; Minesh P Mehta Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: E Weltman; J V Salvajoli; R A Brandt; R de Morais Hanriot; F E Prisco; J C Cruz; S R de Oliveira Borges; D B Wajsbrot Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-03-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Changhong Yu; Andrew E Sloan; Jaime Vengoechea; Meihua Wang; James J Dignam; Michael A Vogelbaum; Paul W Sperduto; Minesh P Mehta; Mitchell Machtay; Michael W Kattan Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Martin Reck; Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu; Andrew G Robinson; Rina Hui; Tibor Csőszi; Andrea Fülöp; Maya Gottfried; Nir Peled; Ali Tafreshi; Sinead Cuffe; Mary O'Brien; Suman Rao; Katsuyuki Hotta; Melanie A Leiby; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Yue Shentu; Reshma Rangwala; Julie R Brahmer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-10-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul W Sperduto; Wen Jiang; Paul D Brown; Steve Braunstein; Penny Sneed; Daniel A Wattson; Helen A Shih; Ananta Bangdiwala; Ryan Shanley; Natalie A Lockney; Kathryn Beal; Emil Lou; Thomas Amatruda; William A Sperduto; John P Kirkpatrick; Norman Yeh; Laurie E Gaspar; Jason K Molitoris; Laura Masucci; David Roberge; James Yu; Veronica Chiang; Minesh Mehta Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Hossein Borghaei; Luis Paz-Ares; Leora Horn; David R Spigel; Martin Steins; Neal E Ready; Laura Q Chow; Everett E Vokes; Enriqueta Felip; Esther Holgado; Fabrice Barlesi; Martin Kohlhäufl; Oscar Arrieta; Marco Angelo Burgio; Jérôme Fayette; Hervé Lena; Elena Poddubskaya; David E Gerber; Scott N Gettinger; Charles M Rudin; Naiyer Rizvi; Lucio Crinò; George R Blumenschein; Scott J Antonia; Cécile Dorange; Christopher T Harbison; Friedrich Graf Finckenstein; Julie R Brahmer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jana Schaule; Stephanie G C Kroeze; Oliver Blanck; Susanne Stera; Klaus H Kahl; Falk Roeder; Stephanie E Combs; David Kaul; An Claes; Markus M Schymalla; Sonja Adebahr; Franziska Eckert; Fabian Lohaus; Nasrin Abbasi-Senger; Guido Henke; Marcella Szuecs; Michael Geier; Nora Sundahl; Daniel Buergy; Reinhard Dummer; Matthias Guckenberger Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 3.481