Literature DB >> 30131590

From homogeneous to heterogeneous network alignment via colored graphlets.

Shawn Gu1, John Johnson1, Fazle E Faisal1,2, Tijana Milenković3,4.   

Abstract

Network alignment (NA) compares networks with the goal of finding a node mapping that uncovers highly similar (conserved) network regions. Existing NA methods are homogeneous, i.e., they can deal only with networks containing nodes and edges of one type. Due to increasing amounts of heterogeneous network data with nodes or edges of different types, we extend three recent state-of-the-art homogeneous NA methods, WAVE, MAGNA++, and SANA, to allow for heterogeneous NA for the first time. We introduce several algorithmic novelties. Namely, these existing methods compute homogeneous graphlet-based node similarities and then find high-scoring alignments with respect to these similarities, while simultaneously maximizing the amount of conserved edges. Instead, we extend homogeneous graphlets to their heterogeneous counterparts, which we then use to develop a new measure of heterogeneous node similarity. Also, we extend S3, a state-of-the-art measure of edge conservation for homogeneous NA, to its heterogeneous counterpart. Then, we find high-scoring alignments with respect to our heterogeneous node similarity and edge conservation measures. In evaluations on synthetic and real-world biological networks, our proposed heterogeneous NA methods lead to higher-quality alignments and better robustness to noise in the data than their homogeneous counterparts. The software and data from this work is available at https://nd.edu/~cone/colored_graphlets/.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30131590      PMCID: PMC6104050          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30831-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  53 in total

1.  Emergence of scaling in random networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  PathBLAST: a tool for alignment of protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Brian P Kelley; Bingbing Yuan; Fran Lewitter; Roded Sharan; Brent R Stockwell; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Pairwise alignment of protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Mehmet Koyutürk; Yohan Kim; Umut Topkara; Shankar Subramaniam; Wojciech Szpankowski; Ananth Grama
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  Align human interactome with phenome to identify causative genes and networks underlying disease families.

Authors:  Xuebing Wu; Qifang Liu; Rui Jiang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Multiple Network Alignment via MultiMAGNA+.

Authors:  Vipin Vijayan; Tijana Milenkovic
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Graphlet kernels for prediction of functional residues in protein structures.

Authors:  Vladimir Vacic; Lilia M Iakoucheva; Stefano Lonardi; Predrag Radivojac
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.479

7.  Proper evaluation of alignment-free network comparison methods.

Authors:  Ömer Nebil Yaveroğlu; Tijana Milenković; Nataša Pržulj
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Local versus global biological network alignment.

Authors:  Lei Meng; Aaron Striegel; Tijana Milenković
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Graphlet-based edge clustering reveals pathogen-interacting proteins.

Authors:  R W Solava; R P Michaels; T Milenkovic
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2008 update.

Authors:  Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz; Chris Stark; Teresa Reguly; Lorrie Boucher; Ashton Breitkreutz; Michael Livstone; Rose Oughtred; Daniel H Lackner; Jürg Bähler; Valerie Wood; Kara Dolinski; Mike Tyers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  9 in total

1.  Pairwise Versus Multiple Global Network Alignment.

Authors:  Vipin Vijayan; Shawn Gu; Eric T Krebs; Lei Meng; Tijana MilenkoviĆ
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  Data-driven network alignment.

Authors:  Shawn Gu; Tijana Milenković
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  L-HetNetAligner: A novel algorithm for Local Alignment of Heterogeneous Biological Networks.

Authors:  Marianna Milano; Tijana Milenković; Mario Cannataro; Pietro Hiram Guzzi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  CREB1K292 and HINFPK330 as Putative Common Therapeutic Targets in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Rohan Gupta; Pravir Kumar
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-12-16

5.  Using dual-network-analyser for communities detecting in dual networks.

Authors:  Pietro Hiram Guzzi; Giuseppe Tradigo; Pierangelo Veltri
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Encoding edge type information in graphlets.

Authors:  Mingshan Jia; Maité Van Alboom; Liesbet Goubert; Piet Bracke; Bogdan Gabrys; Katarzyna Musial
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  A Deep Learning Framework Discovers Compositional Order and Self-Assembly Pathways in Binary Colloidal Mixtures.

Authors:  Runfang Mao; Jared O'Leary; Ali Mesbah; Jeetain Mittal
Journal:  JACS Au       Date:  2022-07-19

8.  Network-based protein structural classification.

Authors:  Khalique Newaz; Mahboobeh Ghalehnovi; Arash Rahnama; Panos J Antsaklis; Tijana Milenković
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 9.  A Guide to Conquer the Biological Network Era Using Graph Theory.

Authors:  Mikaela Koutrouli; Evangelos Karatzas; David Paez-Espino; Georgios A Pavlopoulos
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-01-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.