Literature DB >> 30130548

Gender effects on auditory P300: A systematic review.

Sigita Melynyte1, Grace Y Wang2, Inga Griskova-Bulanova3.   

Abstract

The evidence suggests that gender-related effects could influence the electrophysiological P300 parameters and stand as an additional source of variation for both clinical and non-clinical subjects. The aim of this paper is to characterize gender-related differences in P300 potential as elicited with simple auditory paradigms. This knowledge (1) is important for the practical assessment of P300 potential in normal and clinical populations, and (2) can provide an insight into the understanding of gender differences in pathophysiology, particularly those with differential risk or prevalence in males and females. With this review it is shown that a limited number of studies encounter possible gender effects on parameters of auditory P300, and the findings need to be read with caution due to methodological limitations of the studies. Nevertheless, evidence supports that the P300 amplitude could be significantly modulated by gender, with greater amplitude in females relative to males. Noteworthy, gender has a minimal effect on the P300 latency, and it is often comparable between males and females. Furthermore, the effect of gender on P300 could be modulated by hormonal background, anatomy and some methodological aspects.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory P300; ERP; Gender; Sex

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30130548     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  6 in total

1.  APOE genotype influences P3b amplitude and response to smoking abstinence in young adults.

Authors:  Ryan Coppens; Norka E Rabinovich; Raghuveer Kanneganti; Herman A Diggs; Kristin Wiggs; Travis Healey; Jodi Huggenvik; Gregory M Rose; David G Gilbert
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of emotional face processing in borderline personality disorder: are there differences between men and women?

Authors:  Martin Andermann; Natalie A Izurieta Hidalgo; André Rupp; Christian Schmahl; Sabine C Herpertz; Katja Bertsch
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Aphasia recovery by language training using a brain-computer interface: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Mariacristina Musso; David Hübner; Sarah Schwarzkopf; Maria Bernodusson; Pierre LeVan; Cornelius Weiller; Michael Tangermann
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-02-08

4.  Assessment of Cognition in Hypertensives and Normotensives: A Comparative P300 Study.

Authors:  Yeswanth Gogisetti; Monika Pathania; Sunita Mittal; Pradeep Yadav; Prabin Kharibam; Ravi Kant
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-25

5.  Altered Auditory P300 Performance in Parents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Offspring.

Authors:  Mei Hung Chi; Ching-Lin Chu; I Hui Lee; Yi-Ting Hsieh; Ko Chin Chen; Po See Chen; Yen Kuang Yang
Journal:  Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.582

6.  A multicenter effectiveness trial of QEEG-informed neurofeedback in ADHD: Replication and treatment prediction.

Authors:  Noralie Krepel; Tommy Egtberts; Alexander T Sack; Hartmut Heinrich; Mark Ryan; Martijn Arns
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.881

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.