Literature DB >> 30130518

Return-to-Work Barriers Among Manual Workers After Hand Injuries: 1-Year Follow-up Cohort Study.

Batia S Marom1, Navah Z Ratzon2, Rafael S Carel3, Moshe Sharabi4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine time of return to work (TRTW) in relation to multivariable predictors among male manual workers after hand injury (HI) over a 12-month follow-up.
DESIGN: A cohort study with baseline medical information, functional evaluation, and 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up telephone interviews.
SETTING: Seven physical rehabilitation community occupational therapy clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=178) with acute HI aged 22-65. Two participants were lost to follow-up. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The dependent variable was TRTW. The independent variables originated from 4 domains: personal factors, environmental factors, body function and structure, and activity limitation and participation restriction. The proportion of return to work (RTW) at each time point was calculated. Multiple Cox regressions established a predictive model for TRTW.
RESULTS: At the end of the study, 75.3% participants returned to work. The median TRTW was 94 days. In the final model, only compensation factors and education contributed significantly to overall RTW, but when separate analyses were performed, decreased level of self-efficacy, higher workplace demands, level of pain, level of emotional response to trauma, reduced physical capability of the hand, and higher level of disability were significantly associated with delayed TRTW.
CONCLUSIONS: TRTW was determined by the physical capability of the hand, pain, and psychosocial factors, but it was also affected by legal factors. Participants who did not return to work during the first 9 months are at risk for long-term disability. Developing treatment programs for those who are at risk for not returning to work, taking into consideration these factors, is recommended.
Copyright © 2018 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hand; Injuries; International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; Rehabilitation; Return to work

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30130518     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  6 in total

1.  Long-Term Effects of Psychological Symptoms after Occupational Injury on Return to Work: A 6-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Po-Ching Chu; Wei-Shan Chin; Yue Leon Guo; Judith Shu-Chu Shiao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Well-Being at Work after Return to Work (RTW): A Systematic Review.

Authors:  José-María Figueredo; Cristina García-Ael; Andrea Gragnano; Gabriela Topa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Systematic Review of Biopsychosocial Prognostic Factors for Return to Work After Acute Orthopedic Trauma: A 2020 Update.

Authors:  Hong Phuoc Duong; Anne Garcia; Roger Hilfiker; Bertrand Léger; François Luthi
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-02-04

4.  ICF-based prediction of return to work after trauma rehabilitation: Results of the icfPROreha study in patients with severe musculoskeletal injuries.

Authors:  Sandra Kus; Cornelia Oberhauser; Stefan Simmel; Michaela Coenen
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-09-01

5.  Return-to-Work Predictions for Chinese Patients With Occupational Upper Extremity Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Zhongfei Bai; Jiaqi Zhang; Chaozheng Tang; Lejun Wang; Weili Xia; Qi Qi; Jiani Lu; Yuan Fang; Kenneth N K Fong; Wenxin Niu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-05

6.  Returning to work after a hand injury: Does ethnicity matter?

Authors:  Batia S Marom; Moshe Sharabi; Rafael S Carel; Navah Z Ratzon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.