OBJECTIVE: We develop an electroencephalography (EEG)-based noninvasive brain-computer interface (BCI) system having short training time (15 min) that can be applied for high-performance control of robotic prosthetic systems. METHODS: A signal processing system for detecting user's mental intent from EEG data based on up to six-state BCI paradigm is developed and used. RESULTS: We examine the performance of the developed system on experimental data collected from 12 healthy participants and analyzed offline. Out of 12 participants 3 achieve an accuracy of six-state communication in 80%-90% range, while 2 participants do not achieve a satisfactory accuracy. We further implement an online BCI system for control of a virtual 3 degree-of-freedom (dof) prosthetic manipulator and test it with our three best participants. Two participants are able to successfully complete 100% of the test tasks, demonstrating on average the accuracy rate of 80% and requiring 5-10 s to execute a manipulator move. One participant failed to demonstrate a satisfactory performance in online trials. CONCLUSION: We show that our offline EEG BCI system can correctly identify different motor imageries in EEG data with high accuracy and our online BCI system can be used for control of a virtual 3 dof prosthetic manipulator. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results prepare foundation for further development of higher performance EEG BCI-based robotic assistive systems and demonstrate that EEG-based BCI may be feasible for robotic control by paralyzed and immobilized individuals.
OBJECTIVE: We develop an electroencephalography (EEG)-based noninvasive brain-computer interface (BCI) system having short training time (15 min) that can be applied for high-performance control of robotic prosthetic systems. METHODS: A signal processing system for detecting user's mental intent from EEG data based on up to six-state BCI paradigm is developed and used. RESULTS: We examine the performance of the developed system on experimental data collected from 12 healthy participants and analyzed offline. Out of 12 participants 3 achieve an accuracy of six-state communication in 80%-90% range, while 2 participants do not achieve a satisfactory accuracy. We further implement an online BCI system for control of a virtual 3 degree-of-freedom (dof) prosthetic manipulator and test it with our three best participants. Two participants are able to successfully complete 100% of the test tasks, demonstrating on average the accuracy rate of 80% and requiring 5-10 s to execute a manipulator move. One participant failed to demonstrate a satisfactory performance in online trials. CONCLUSION: We show that our offline EEG BCI system can correctly identify different motor imageries in EEG data with high accuracy and our online BCI system can be used for control of a virtual 3 dof prosthetic manipulator. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results prepare foundation for further development of higher performance EEG BCI-based robotic assistive systems and demonstrate that EEG-based BCI may be feasible for robotic control by paralyzed and immobilized individuals.