| Literature DB >> 30128946 |
Alessandro Viganò1,2, Maria Claudia Torrieri3, Massimiliano Toscano1,4, Francesca Puledda5, Barbara Petolicchio1, Tullia Sasso D'Elia2, Angela Verzina6, Sonia Ruggiero1, Marta Altieri1, Edoardo Vicenzini1, Jean Schoenen7, Vittorio Di Piero8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic management of Chronic Migraine (CM), often associated with Medication Overuse Headache (MOH), is chiefly empirical, as no biomarker predicting or correlating with clinical efficacy is available to address therapeutic choices. The present study searched for neurophysiological correlates of Greater Occipital Nerve Block (GON-B) effects in CM.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic migraine; Habituation; Plasticity; Predictors; Serotonin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30128946 PMCID: PMC6102162 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-018-0901-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Headache Pain ISSN: 1129-2369 Impact factor: 7.277
Fig. 1Study design. Patients were recruited at T0. After 1 month of clinical evaluation, we performed neurophysiological recordings (habituation and IDAP) prior to GON anaesthetic block. Early neurophysiological changes were collected after a week and clinical revaluation was planned at 30 days
Baseline characteristics of CM patients
| Parameters | Patients | Healthy volunteers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 32.9 ± 14.5 | 31.45 ± 13.94 | |
| Gender | 17 F | 19 F | – |
| N° of headache days per month | 24.88 ± 7.22 | – | – |
| Medication Overuse Headache | 12 (70%) | – | – |
| Type of medication overused | – | – | |
| Triptans: 4 (33%) | |||
| NSAIDs: 7 (58%) | |||
| Combination: 1 (8%) | |||
| N° of acute medication per month | 16.18 ± 12.31 | – | – |
| Pain intensity (1–3 scale) | 1point 0 pts | ||
| 2 points 3 pts | – | – | |
| 3 points 15 pts | |||
| Habituation N1P1 at T0 | 0.23 ± 0.68 | 0.26 ± 0.63 | |
| Habituation P1N2 at baseline | 0.20 ± 0.55 | 0.08 ± 0.53 | |
| IDAP at baseline | 0.76 ± 0.95 | 0.03 ± 0.76 |
The star (*) indicates the p level after post-hoc comparison, when appropriate. Otherwise, p level indicated refers to the one obtained by the repeated measures model
Fig. 2Clinical effect at group and individual level. GON block was effective in reduce the average clincial burden of chronic migraine by 35%. More over we observed that after GON-B the majority of patients who responded reversed to EM. Only one case had a 15 days reduction but passed from 30 days to 15 days of headache remaining within the boundary of chronic migraine. Most of patients, who didn’t respond, had no benefit (five of them are 30 days to 30 days and then superimposed in the graph). Two Responders passed from 15 days to 6 days and are superimposed in the graph. Responders are in dotted, No-responders in continuous line
Time effect of neurophysiological parameters between Responders and Non-responders
| Variables | Effect | SS | DoF | F value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Habituation of N1P1 | GROUP | 0.03 | 1 | 0.08 | 0.79 |
| TIME | 0.10 | 1 | 0.32 | 0.58 | |
| TIME*GROUP | 0.36 | 1 | 1.17 | 0.30 | |
| Habituation of P1N2 | GROUP | 1.01 | 1 | 2.12 | 0.17 |
| TIME | 0.97 | 1 | 2.90 | 0.11 | |
| TIME*GROUP | 0.02 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.83 | |
| IDAP | GROUP | 0.28 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.63 |
| TIME | 6.02 | 1 | 9.66 | 0.008° | |
| TIME*GROUP | 1.67 | 1 | 2.68 | 0.13 |
The symbol ° indicates the level of significance obtained by the repeated measures model
Fig. 3Responders vs. No-responders difference in early neurophysiological responses after GON-B. One week after the GON-B responders had no change in N1P1 response. For P1N2 component of habituation both Responders and Non-responders had a trend towards the reduction of habituation degree (although not significant, p = 0.11). No significant difference was found after multiple comparison tests. On the other hand, CM patients had an early reduction in IDAP slope, corresponding to an increase in serotonin firing, after GON-B (p = 0.008), with a significant difference at multiple comparison tests in Responders vs. Non-responders (p = 0.004). Responders are in dotted, No-responders in continuous line
Fig. 4Correlation analysis between clinical improvement and IDAP changes. At the group level, the reduction in IDAP value was positively correlated with the reduction of day of headache in the follow-up month. Positive IDAP values indicate that the T1 measurement was smaller than the first. The calculation for IDAP change was: IDAP change = IDAP(T0)-IDAP(T1). On the other hand for headache days calculation was: Headache reduction = days(T2)-days(T0)