Literature DB >> 30128870

Effect of Cesarean Section on the Severity of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Chinese Women: The Shanxi Study.

Chang Xu1, Qiang Fu2, Hong-Bing Tao3, Xiao-Jun Lin1, Man-Li Wang1, Shu-Xu Xia1, Hao-Ling Xiong1.   

Abstract

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the most adverse obstetric outcomes. Our aim is to detect the risks of multilevel PPH in different cesarean section (CS) groups [including nulliparous CS with indications, nulliparous CS without indications, repeat cesarean (RC), vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), cesarean after vaginal birth (CAVB)]. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, and the data on 127 145 women collected from January 2014 to May 2016 and from 35 tertiary hospitals in Shanxi province, China, were reviewed. Based on the measuring results of PPH, an ordered logistic regression model was used to analyze the adjusted PPH risks for each of the CS groups, and comparisons were drawn between them. Finally, a total of 99 066 nulliparous (77.92%) and 28 079 multiparous (22.08%) women were observed. The number of CS cases was 61 117, and the rate for CS was 48.07%. A total of 10 029 women did not show indications for CS and accounted for 16.41% of the CS parturient, whereas 9103 women underwent a repeated cesarean, with a CS frequency of 14.89%. The number of VBAC cases was 989, whose rate was 9.88% in prior CS women. The number (proportions) of PPH was 3658 (2.88%) in LI (PPH volume: ≥900 and <1500 mL), 520 (0.41%) in 12 (PPH volume: >1500 and <2100 mL), and 201 (0.16%) in L3 (PPH volume: ≥2100 mL). The Ln (n=l, 2,3, etc.) represented the increasing order of PPH severity. In the adjusted results, compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) as the reference group, in the adjusted result for nulliparous, there was a decreased PPH risk in CS with indications (OR: 2.32; CI: 2.04-2.62), which was lower than that of CS without indications (OR: 2.50; CI: 2.01-2.96). The highest PPH risk in all subgroups (i.e. nulliparous and multiparous groups) was observed in the RC (OR: 3.61; CI: 3.16-4.17), which was nearly twice higher than that of the VBAC (OR: 1.82; CI: 1.33-2.52). CAVB (OR: 1.03; CI: 0.65-1.62) showed no significant difference with the reference group. Thus, we deemed that CS should be avoided in nulliparous pregnancies unless indicated, to prevent or reduce the rates for the use of RC or VBAC which are high risks of severe PPH to the parturient women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean section; indications; parity; postpartum hemorrhage

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30128870     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-018-1922-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Sci        ISSN: 2523-899X


  24 in total

1.  Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Irene Stafford; Gary A Dildy; Steven L Clark; Michael A Belfort
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Mark B Landon; John C Hauth; Kenneth J Leveno; Catherine Y Spong; Sharon Leindecker; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Baha Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A new perspective on VBAC: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Genia Rozen; Antony M Ugoni; Penny M Sheehan
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section.

Authors:  M J McMahon; E R Luther; W A Bowes; A F Olshan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-09-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case-control study.

Authors:  A Karlström; H Lindgren; I Hildingsson
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08.

Authors:  Pisake Lumbiganon; Malinee Laopaiboon; A Metin Gülmezoglu; João Paulo Souza; Surasak Taneepanichskul; Pang Ruyan; Deepika Eranjanie Attygalle; Naveen Shrestha; Rintaro Mori; Duc Hinh Nguyen; Thi Bang Hoang; Tung Rathavy; Kang Chuyun; Kannitha Cheang; Mario Festin; Venus Udomprasertgul; Maria Julieta V Germar; Gao Yanqiu; Malabika Roy; Guillermo Carroli; Katherine Ba-Thike; Ekaterina Filatova; José Villar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Prevalence and risk factors of severe obstetric haemorrhage.

Authors:  I Al-Zirqi; S Vangen; L Forsen; B Stray-Pedersen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Stage of labor at admission among Ugandan women with a prior cesarean, and its impact on management and delivery outcomes.

Authors:  Adeline A Boatin; Elly Agaba; Baltazar Nyongozi; Blair J Wylie
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.561

9.  WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates.

Authors:  A P Betran; M R Torloni; J J Zhang; A M Gülmezoglu
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  An analysis of variations of indications and maternal-fetal prognosis for caesarean section in a tertiary hospital of Beijing: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yajun Liu; Xin Wang; Liying Zou; Yan Ruan; Weiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Application Effect of Doctor-Nurse Collaborative and Hierarchical Management Combined with Nursing Risk Management in Nursing Management of Patients with Postpartum Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Zhihui Xia; Youping Tan; Cui Ru
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Optimal dose of misoprostol combined with oxytocin for preventing postpartum hemorrhage in cesarean section: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Wirawan Sringamwong; Surasak Saokaew; Pajaree Mongkhon
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-06-04

3.  Comparison of Low Dose versus High Dose of Oxytocin for Initiating Uterine Contraction During Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized, Controlled, Non-Inferiority Trial.

Authors:  Monsicha Somjit; Jaruta Surojananon; Kiattisak Kongwattanakul; Cattleya Kasemsiri; Monthira Sirisom; Khuantipa Prawannoa; Kaewjai Thepsuthammarat; Ratana Komwilaisak
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2020-08-24

4.  Risk score for predicting primary cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Chadakarn Phaloprakarn; Siriwan Tangjitgamol
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  Obstetric Anesthesia and Heart Disease: Practical Clinical Considerations.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Meng; Katherine W Arendt
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 8.986

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.