Literature DB >> 30128539

Evaluation of Clinical Questions and Patient-Important Outcomes Associated With the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Kristina B Lindsley1,2, Susan Hutfless3, Barbara S Hawkins4, Jill F Blim5, Dan Roberts6, Timothy W Olsen7,8, Flora Lum9, Kay Dickersin1,10.   

Abstract

Importance: Identifying and prioritizing unanswered clinical questions may help to best allocate limited resources for research associated with the treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Objective: To identify and prioritize clinical questions and outcomes for research associated with the treatment of AMD through engagement with professional and patient stakeholders. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multiple cross-sectional survey questions were used in a modified Delphi process for panel members of US and international organizations, the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Retina/Vitreous Panel (n=7), health care professionals from the American Society of Retinal Specialists (ASRS) (n=90), Atlantic Coast Retina Conference (ACRC) and Macula 2017 meeting (n=34); and patients from MD (Macular Degeneration) Support (n=46). Data were collected from January 20, 2015, to January 9, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prioritizing of clinical questions and patient-important outcomes for AMD.
Results: Seventy clinical questions were derived from the AAO Preferred Practice Patterns for AMD and suggestions by the AAO Retina/Vitreous Panel. The AAO Retina/Vitreous Panel assessed all 70 clinical questions and rated 17 of 70 questions (24%) as highly important. Health care professionals assessed the 17 highly important clinical questions and rated 12 of 17 questions (71%) as high priority for research to answer; 9 of 12 high-priority clinical questions were associated with aspects of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. Patients assessed the 17 highly important clinical questions and rated all as high priority. Additionally, patients identified 6 of 33 outcomes (18%) as most important to them (choroidal neovascularization, development of advanced AMD, retinal hemorrhage, gain of vision, slowing vision loss, and serious ocular events). Conclusions and Relevance: Input from 4 stakeholder groups suggests good agreement on which 12 priority clinical questions can be used to underpin research related to the treatment of AMD. The 6 most important outcomes identified by patients were balanced between intended effects of AMD treatment (eg, slowing vision loss) and adverse events. Consideration of these patient-important outcomes may help to guide clinical care and future areas of research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30128539      PMCID: PMC6248173          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  17 in total

1.  Setting Priorities for Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research and Identifying Evidence Gaps.

Authors:  Jimmy T Le; Susan Hutfless; Tianjing Li; Neil M Bressler; James Heyward; Ava K Bittner; Adam Glassman; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Ophthalmol Retina       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

Review 2.  The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.

Authors:  Paula R Williamson; Douglas G Altman; Heather Bagley; Karen L Barnes; Jane M Blazeby; Sara T Brookes; Mike Clarke; Elizabeth Gargon; Sarah Gorst; Nicola Harman; Jamie J Kirkham; Angus McNair; Cecilia A C Prinsen; Jochen Schmitt; Caroline B Terwee; Bridget Young
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 3.  Gaps in Current Knowledge and Priorities for Future Research in Dry Eye.

Authors:  Ian J Saldanha; Kay Dickersin; Susan T Hutfless; Esen K Akpek
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research on management of primary angle closure: a survey of Asia-Pacific clinicians.

Authors:  Tsung Yu; Tianjing Li; Kinbo J Lee; David S Friedman; Kay Dickersin; Milo A Puhan
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2015 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research: a case study using primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Tianjing Li; Ann-Margret Ervin; Roberta Scherer; Henry Jampel; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States.

Authors:  David S Friedman; Benita J O'Colmain; Beatriz Muñoz; Sandra C Tomany; Cathy McCarty; Paulus T V M de Jong; Barbara Nemesure; Paul Mitchell; John Kempen
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04

7.  Interventions for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Are Practice Guidelines Based on Systematic Reviews?

Authors:  Kristina Lindsley; Tianjing Li; Elizabeth Ssemanda; Gianni Virgili; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews addressing four common eye conditions: an evaluation of completeness and comparability.

Authors:  Ian J Saldanha; Kay Dickersin; Xue Wang; Tianjing Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider.

Authors:  Paula R Williamson; Douglas G Altman; Jane M Blazeby; Mike Clarke; Declan Devane; Elizabeth Gargon; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Methods to identify and prioritize patient-centered outcomes for use in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Evan Mayo-Wilson; Asieh Golozar; Terrie Cowley; Nicole Fusco; Gillian Gresham; Jennifer Haythornthwaite; Elizabeth Tolbert; Jennifer L Payne; Lori Rosman; Susan Hutfless; Joseph K Canner; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-06-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  Patient-relevant outcomes: what are we talking about? A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity.

Authors:  Christine Kersting; Malte Kneer; Anne Barzel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Patients' perspective on supposedly patient-relevant process and outcome parameters: a cross-sectional survey within the 'PRO patients study'.

Authors:  Christine Kersting; Julia Hülsmann; Klaus Weckbecker; Achim Mortsiefer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Grand Challenges in global eye health: a global prioritisation process using Delphi method.

Authors:  Jacqueline Ramke; Jennifer R Evans; Esmael Habtamu; Nyawira Mwangi; Juan Carlos Silva; Bonnielin K Swenor; Nathan Congdon; Hannah B Faal; Allen Foster; David S Friedman; Stephen Gichuhi; Jost B Jonas; Peng T Khaw; Fatima Kyari; Gudlavalleti V S Murthy; Ningli Wang; Tien Y Wong; Richard Wormald; Mayinuer Yusufu; Hugh Taylor; Serge Resnikoff; Sheila K West; Matthew J Burton
Journal:  Lancet Healthy Longev       Date:  2022-01

Review 4.  Research priority setting related to older adults: a scoping review to inform the Cochrane-Campbell Global Ageing Partnership work programme.

Authors:  Victoria I Barbeau; Leen Madani; Abdulah Al Ameer; Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu; Deirdre Beecher; Monserrat Conde; Tracey E Howe; Sue Marcus; Richard Morley; Mona Nasser; Maureen Smith; Jo Thompson Coon; Vivian A Welch
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.006

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.